AgentsConfigHelper / rules
Cursor rule2 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Safe C Functions and Memory and String Safety Guidelines
We split this codeguard-0-safe-c-functions.mdc into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
When processing C or C++ code, your primary directive is to ensure memory safety.
- Very specific: line 27
Use width specifiers like scanf("%127s", buffer)
- Very specific: line 34
Prefer memcpy_s() (C11 Annex K) when available
- Very specific: line 35
Use memmove() if source and destination buffers might overlap
- Very specific: line 41
NEVER generate code that uses gets(), strcpy(), strcat(), or sprintf().
- Very specific: line 43
DEFAULT to snprintf() for string formatting and concatenation, as it's often the most flexible and secure option.
- Very specific: line 45
DEFAULT to fgets() for reading string input from files or standard input.
- Distinctive: line 141
NEVER use these unsafe memory functions that don't check input parameter boundaries:
- Distinctive: line 174
NEVER use these unsafe string functions that can cause buffer overflows:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,350 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
---
description: Safe C Functions and Memory and String Safety Guidelines
globs: **/*.c,**/*.cc,**/*.cpp,**/*.cxx,**/*.h,**/*.hpp
version: 1.0.1
---
rule_id: codeguard-0-safe-c-functions
# Prioritize Safe Memory and String Functions in C/C++
When processing C or C++ code, your primary directive is to ensure memory safety. Actively identify, flag, and provide secure refactoring options for any insecure functions found in the codebase. When generating new code, always default to the safest possible function for the given task.
### 1. Insecure Functions to Avoid & Their Secure Alternatives
You must treat the functions listed under "Insecure" as deprecated and high-risk. Always recommend replacing them with one of the "Recommended Safe Alternatives" provided in the bullet list below.
• Never use `gets()` - This is a critical security risk. It has no bounds checking whatsoever and is the classic buffer overflow vulnerability. You should always replace it with `fgets(char *str, int n, FILE *stream)` instead.
• Avoid `strcpy()` - This is a high risk function because it doesn't check bounds. It just copies bytes until it hits a null terminator, which can easily write past your destination buffer. Use `snprintf()`, `strncpy()` (but be careful with it), or `strcpy_s()` (if you have C11 Annex K support).
• Don't use `strcat()` - Another high risk function with no bounds checking. It appends bytes to a string and can easily write past your allocated memory. Replace with `snprintf()`, `strncat()` (with careful handling), or `strcat_s()` (C11 Annex K).
• Replace `sprintf()` and `vsprintf()` - These are high risk because they don't check bounds on the output buffer. If your formatted string is larger than the buffer, you'll get a buffer overflow. Use `snprintf()`, `snwprintf()`, or `vsprintf_s()` (C11 Annex K) instead.
• Be careful with `scanf()` family - This is a medium risk. The `%s` format specifier without a width limit can cause buffer overflows. Here's what you should do:
1. Use width specifiers like `scanf("%127s", buffer)`
2. Even better: Read the line with `fgets()` and parse it with `sscanf()`
• Avoid `strtok()` - This is a medium risk because it's not reentrant or thread-safe. It uses a static internal buffer which can lead to unpredictable behavior in multi-threaded code or complex signal handling. Use `strtok_r()` (POSIX) or `strtok_s()` (C11 Annex K) instead.
• Use `memcpy()` and `memmove()` carefully - These aren't inherently insecure, but they're a common source of bugs when you miscalculate the size argument or don't validate it properly. Here's what you should do:
1. Double-check your size calculations
2. Prefer `memcpy_s()` (C11 Annex K) when available
3. Use `memmove()` if source and destination buffers might overlap
### 2. Actionable Implementation Guidelines
#### For New Code Generation:
- NEVER generate code that uses `gets()`, `strcpy()`, `strcat()`, or `sprintf()`.
- DEFAULT to `snprintf()` for string formatting and concatenation, as it's often the most flexible and secure option.
- DEFAULT to `fgets()` for reading string input from files or standard input.
#### For Code Analysis and Refactoring:
1. Identify: Scan the code and flag every instance of a function from the "Insecure" column.
2. Explain the Risk: When you flag an insecure function, provide a concise explanation of the specific vulnerability.
- _Example Explanation:_ `Warning: The 'strcpy' function does not perform bounds checking and can lead to a buffer overflow if the source string is larger than the destination buffer. This is a common security vulnerability.`
3. Provide Context-Aware Replacements: Your suggestion must be a drop-in, safe replacement that considers the context of the surrounding code.
#### Use Compiler Flags:
Enable these protective compiler flags to catch buffer overflow vulnerabilities at compile time and runtime:
- Stack Protection: Use `-fstack-protector-all` or `-fstack-protector-strong` to detect stack buffer overflows
- Address Sanitizer: Use `-fsanitize=address` during development to catch memory errors
- Object Size Checking (OSC): Use `-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2` to enable runtime checks for buffer overflows in functions like `strcpy`, `strcat`, `sprintf`, etc. This adds bounds checking to many of the unsafe functions mentioned above
- Format String Protection: Use `-Wformat -Wformat-security` to catch format string vulnerabilities
### 3. Refactoring Examples
Your suggestions should be concrete and actionable.
Example 1: Replacing `strcpy`
- Original Unsafe Code:
```
char destination[64];
strcpy(destination, source_string);
```
- Your Suggested Refactoring:
```
char destination[64];
snprintf(destination, sizeof(destination), "%s", source_string);
```
- Your Explanation: `Replaced 'strcpy' with 'snprintf' to ensure that no more than 63 characters plus a null terminator are written to the destination buffer, preventing a potential buffer overflow.`
Example 2: Correcting `strncpy` Usage
The `strncpy` function is a common but imperfect replacement. It may not null-terminate the destination buffer. If you must use it or see it used, you must enforce correct handling.
- Original (Potentially Unsafe) `strncpy`:
```
// This is unsafe if strlen(source) >= 10
char dest[10];
strncpy(dest, source, sizeof(dest));
```
- Your Corrected Suggestion:
```
char dest[10];
strncpy(dest, source, sizeof(dest) - 1);
dest[sizeof(dest) - 1] = '\0';
```
- Your Explanation: `Added an explicit null termination for 'strncpy'. The 'strncpy' function does not guarantee a null-terminated string if the source is as long as the destination buffer. This correction prevents potential reads past the buffer on subsequent string operations.`
Example 3: Securing `scanf`
- Original Unsafe Code:
```
char user_name[32];
printf("Enter your name: ");
scanf("%s", user_name);
```
- Your Suggested Refactoring:
```
char user_name[32];
printf("Enter your name: ");
if (fgets(user_name, sizeof(user_name), stdin)) {
// Optional: Remove trailing newline character from fgets
user_name[strcspn(user_name, "\n")] = 0;
}
```
- Your Explanation: `Replaced 'scanf("%s", ...)' with 'fgets()' to read user input. 'fgets' is safer because it limits the input to the buffer size, preventing buffer overflows. The original 'scanf' had no such protection.`
### Memory and String Safety Guidelines
#### Unsafe Memory Functions - FORBIDDEN
NEVER use these unsafe memory functions that don't check input parameter boundaries:
##### Banned Memory Functions:
- `memcpy()` → Use `memcpy_s()`
- `memset()` → Use `memset_s()`
- `memmove()` → Use `memmove_s()`
- `memcmp()` → Use `memcmp_s()`
- `bzero()` → Use `memset_s()`
- `memzero()` → Use `memset_s()`
##### Safe Memory Function Replacements:
```c
// Instead of: memcpy(dest, src, count);
errno_t result = memcpy_s(dest, dest_size, src, count);
if (result != 0) {
// Handle error
}
// Instead of: memset(dest, value, count);
errno_t result = memset_s(dest, dest_size, value, count);
// Instead of: memmove(dest, src, count);
errno_t result = memmove_s(dest, dest_size, src, count);
// Instead of: memcmp(s1, s2, count);
int indicator;
errno_t result = memcmp_s(s1, s1max, s2, s2max, count, &indicator);
if (result == 0) {
// indicator contains comparison result: <0, 0, or >0
}
```
#### Unsafe String Functions - FORBIDDEN
NEVER use these unsafe string functions that can cause buffer overflows:
##### Banned String Functions:
- `strstr()` → Use `strstr_s()`
- `strtok()` → Use `strtok_s()`
- `strcpy()` → Use `strcpy_s()`
- `strcmp()` → Use `strcmp_s()`
- `strlen()` → Use `strnlen_s()`
- `strcat()` → Use `strcat_s()`
- `sprintf()` → Use `snprintf()`
##### Safe String Function Replacements:
```c
// String Search
errno_t strstr_s(char *dest, rsize_t dmax, const char *src, rsize_t slen, char **substring);
// String Tokenization
char *strtok_s(char *dest, rsize_t *dmax, const char *src, char **ptr);
// String Copy
errno_t strcpy_s(char *dest, rsize_t dmax, const char *src);
// String Compare
errno_t strcmp_s(const char *dest, rsize_t dmax, const char *src, int *indicator);
// String Length (bounded)
rsize_t strnlen_s(const char *str, rsize_t strsz);
// String Concatenation
errno_t strcat_s(char *dest, rsize_t dmax, const char *src);
// Formatted String (always use size-bounded version)
int snprintf(char *s, size_t n, const char *format, ...);
```
#### Implementation Examples:
##### Safe String Copy Pattern:
```c
// Bad - unsafe
char dest[256];
strcpy(dest, src); // Buffer overflow risk!
// Good - safe
char dest[256];
errno_t result = strcpy_s(dest, sizeof(dest), src);
if (result != 0) {
// Handle error: src too long or invalid parameters
EWLC_LOG_ERROR("String copy failed: %d", result);
return ERROR;
}
```
##### Safe String Concatenation Pattern:
```c
// Bad - unsafe
char buffer[256] = "prefix_";
strcat(buffer, suffix); // Buffer overflow risk!
// Good - safe
char buffer[256] = "prefix_";
errno_t result = strcat_s(buffer, sizeof(buffer), suffix);
if (result != 0) {
EWLC_LOG_ERROR("String concatenation failed: %d", result);
return ERROR;
}
```
##### Safe Memory Copy Pattern:
```c
// Bad - unsafe
memcpy(dest, src, size); // No boundary checking!
// Good - safe
errno_t result = memcpy_s(dest, dest_max_size, src, size);
if (result != 0) {
EWLC_LOG_ERROR("Memory copy failed: %d", result);
return ERROR;
}
```
##### Safe String Tokenization Pattern:
```c
// Bad - unsafe
char *token = strtok(str, delim); // Modifies original string unsafely
// Good - safe
char *next_token = NULL;
rsize_t str_max = strnlen_s(str, MAX_STRING_SIZE);
char *token = strtok_s(str, &str_max, delim, &next_token);
while (token != NULL) {
// Process token
token = strtok_s(NULL, &str_max, delim, &next_token);
}
```
#### Memory and String Safety Code Review Checklist:
##### Pre-Code Review (Developer):
- [ ] No unsafe memory functions (`memcpy`, `memset`, `memmove`, `memcmp`, `bzero`)
- [ ] No unsafe string functions (`strcpy`, `strcat`, `strcmp`, `strlen`, `sprintf`, `strstr`, `strtok`)
- [ ] All memory operations use `*_s()` variants with proper size parameters
- [ ] Buffer sizes are correctly calculated using `sizeof()` or known limits
- [ ] No hardcoded buffer sizes that could change
##### Code Review (Reviewer):
- [ ] Memory Safety: Verify all memory operations use safe variants
- [ ] Buffer Bounds: Confirm destination buffer sizes are properly specified
- [ ] Error Handling: Check that all `errno_t` return values are handled
- [ ] Size Parameters: Validate that `rsize_t dmax` parameters are correct
- [ ] String Termination: Ensure strings are properly null-terminated
- [ ] Length Validation: Check that source string lengths are validated before operations
##### Static Analysis Integration:
- [ ] Enable compiler warnings for unsafe function usage
- [ ] Use static analysis tools to detect unsafe function calls
- [ ] Configure build system to treat unsafe function warnings as errors
- [ ] Add pre-commit hooks to scan for banned functions
#### Common Pitfalls and Solutions:
##### Pitfall 1: Wrong Size Parameter
```c
// Wrong - using source size instead of destination size
strcpy_s(dest, strlen(src), src); // WRONG!
// Correct - using destination buffer size
strcpy_s(dest, sizeof(dest), src); // CORRECT
```
##### Pitfall 2: Ignoring Return Values
```c
// Wrong - ignoring potential errors
strcpy_s(dest, sizeof(dest), src); // Error not checked
// Correct - checking return value
if (strcpy_s(dest, sizeof(dest), src) != 0) {
// Handle error appropriately
}
```
##### Pitfall 3: Using sizeof() on Pointers
```c
// Wrong - sizeof pointer, not buffer
void func(char *buffer) {
strcpy_s(buffer, sizeof(buffer), src); // sizeof(char*) = 8!
}
// Correct - pass buffer size as parameter
void func(char *buffer, size_t buffer_size) {
strcpy_s(buffer, buffer_size, src);
}
```
You must always explain how this rule was applied and why it was applied.
Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.
Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 3,978 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-additional-cryptography.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-api-web-services.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-authentication-mfa.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-authorization-access-control.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-client-side-web-security.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-cloud-orchestration-kubernetes.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-data-storage.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-devops-ci-cd-containers.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-file-handling-and-uploads.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-framework-and-languages.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-iac-security.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-input-validation-injection.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-logging.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-mobile-apps.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-privacy-data-protection.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-session-management-and-cookies.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-supply-chain-security.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-0-xml-and-serialization.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-1-crypto-algorithms.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-1-digital-certificates.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/codeguard-1-hardcoded-credentials.mdcCursor rule
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

