agentleFS
jramsahaijramsahai/obsidian-mcp-brain/idea-pipeline/SKILL.md

idea-pipeline

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Capture, compare, score, and pressure-test startup or product ideas before they become tracked work projects. Use when: (1) brainstorming candidate ideas, (2) comparing multiple directions, (3) building an idea scorecard, (4) evaluating whether an idea is worth deeper validation, or (5) deciding whether to promote an idea into a tracked project. NOT for: maintaining an active work project, project archival, or project-specific research after a tracked project has already been established.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not force ideas into the same structure as tracked work projects.

    line 28
  2. Distinctive:

    Only fill sections with real content.

    line 90
  3. Very specific:

    If an idea accumulates research docs, it graduates to Ideas/[Idea Name]/[Idea Name].md with docs alongside.

    line 92
  4. Distinctive:

    Before deeper work, pressure-test each idea with:

    line 96
  5. Very specific:

    If an idea deserves deeper structured research before promotion, keep that research with the idea (Ideas/[Idea Name]/) as idea-stage …

    line 114
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not use this skill for:

    line 118

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Idea Pipeline

Manage uncertainty before an idea becomes a formal tracked project. Ideas live in the Obsidian second brain; use second-brain for shared vault conventions.

Core Principle

Ideas are not work projects.

An idea artifact should support:

  • comparison
  • scoring
  • uncertainty
  • iteration
  • promotion or discard decisions

Do not force ideas into the same structure as tracked work projects.

Tools

One note per idea at Ideas/[Idea Name].md; the server derives the path from the name.

NeedCall
Capture an ideaobsidian__note_create type="idea" name="Overlap"
Fill a sectionobsidian__section_append note="Overlap" section="Problem" content="…"
Add a scorecard rowobsidian__section_append note="Overlap" section="Scorecard" content="| Pain level | 4 | daily friction |"
Change statusobsidian__note_set_field note="Overlap" field="status" value="researching"
Cross-linkobsidian__relate note="Overlap" target="Pricing Models" reason="…"
Compare candidatesobsidian__vault_list type="idea" status="candidate"

obsidian__note_create type="idea" lays out every section below and the frontmatter. You do not write frontmatter; status afterwards is obsidian__note_set_field.

## Scorecard is a table, so pass rows pipe-delimited — the tool appends them as rows and names the columns if the shape is wrong.

Idea Note Shape

# [Idea Name]

## Concept

## Target User

## Problem

## Wedge

## Why It Might Work

## Monetization Thoughts

## Risks

## Open Questions

## Next Validation Step

## Scorecard

| Criterion | Score (1-5) | Notes |
|-----------|-------------|-------|
| Pain level | | |
| Frequency | | |
| Urgency | | |
| Audience clarity | | |
| Distribution ease | | |
| MVP complexity | | |
| Monetization plausibility | | |
| Personal excitement | | |

## Related

- [[Related note]] — why

status values: candidate (captured), researching (active validation), promoted (became a project — link it), discarded (keep the note and the reason; dead ideas are still reference).

Only fill sections with real content; leave the rest empty. Wikilink related projects, people, and knowledge notes.

If an idea accumulates research docs, it graduates to Ideas/[Idea Name]/[Idea Name].md with docs alongside.

Screening Questions

Before deeper work, pressure-test each idea with:

  • Can the user/problem be explained in one sentence?
  • Can we imagine getting the first 10 users?
  • Is there a plausible payer?
  • Is this solving a pain point rather than just being clever?
  • Would it still be worth working on if growth were slow?

Promotion Rule

Promote an idea into a tracked project only when:

  • the concept is concrete enough to execute against
  • there is a clear enough scope for tasks and progress tracking
  • the next step is no longer just comparison/validation but actual project work

At that point, use project-tracking to create the project note, set the idea's status with obsidian__note_set_field note="[Idea Name]" field="status" value="promoted", and cross-link both notes with obsidian__relate note="Overlap" target="Overlap Rollout" reason="this project came out of the idea" mirror=true. Move idea-stage research into the project's Docs/ if it becomes working material.

Research Hand-off

If an idea deserves deeper structured research before promotion, keep that research with the idea (Ideas/[Idea Name]/) as idea-stage validation. Research moves to the project only on promotion. Be deliberate about the boundary.

Out of Scope

Do not use this skill for:

  • routine updates to active work projects -> project-tracking
  • project archival or status rollups -> project-tracking / standup
  • day-to-day task logging -> task-tracking
  • evergreen reference capture -> knowledge-base

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.