vault-recall
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Answer questions from the Obsidian vault: "what do I know about X", "what did I discuss with [person]", "when/why did we decide Y", "summarize my week", project or topic history. Read-only search, reading, and synthesis across notes, links, and syntheses. NOT for: capturing or changing anything (use the routing skills), daily standup (standup), or vault reorganization (nightly-consolidation).
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jayantak/vaultmemtheir own version, first seen Jul 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- jayantak/vaultmem★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- daily-journalSkill
- goalsSkill
- idea-pipelineSkill
- knowledge-baseSkill
- meeting-notesSkill
- nightly-consolidationSkill
- people-notesSkill
- project-trackingSkill
- resurfacingSkill
- second-brainSkill
- shopping-listSkill
- skill-tuningSkill
- standupSkill
- task-trackingSkill
- weekly-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Use second-brain for vault conventions and the shared tool surface.
- Distinctive: line 20
Every tool here is read-only.
- Very specific: line 36
Named entity first: If the question names a person, project, store, topic, or idea, read its note directly with obsidian__vault_read …
- Distinctive: line 56
Never fill a gap from general knowledge without labelling it as outside the vault.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Vault Recall
Answer the user's questions from what the second brain already holds. Read-only: recall never mutates the vault. If the answer prompts a change ("actually, mark that done"), route it to the owning skill afterwards.
Use second-brain for vault conventions and the shared tool surface. An empty search result and a "not found" are authoritative answers, not errors — see second-brain -> Tools.
Tools
Every tool here is read-only. Never construct a file path: pass the note name as it appears in a wikilink and the server resolves it.
| Need | Call |
| Read a note | obsidian__vault_read note="Wayfinder" |
| Read one section | obsidian__vault_read note="Jane Doe" section="Conversation History" |
| Full-text search | obsidian__vault_search query="pricing" |
| Narrow a search | obsidian__vault_search query="pricing" type="knowledge" |
| Notes by type, folder, status, or change date | obsidian__vault_list type="project" status="Active" |
| Newest note in a dated folder | obsidian__vault_list folder="Syntheses" latest=true |
| Backlinks — what links here | obsidian__vault_links direction="in" note="Wayfinder" |
| Outgoing links | obsidian__vault_links direction="out" note="Wayfinder" |
| Orientation before a broad question | obsidian__vault_status |
Search Strategy (layered — stop as soon as the question is answered)
- Named entity first. If the question names a person, project, store, topic, or idea, read its note directly with
obsidian__vault_read note="…". The note and its tables usually answer the question outright. - Search.
obsidian__vault_searchon the key terms; try 2-3 phrasings before concluding absence. Narrow withtypeorfolderwhen you know where the answer lives. - Follow the graph one hop.
obsidian__vault_links direction="in"anddirection="out"on the notes found, then read their## Relatedsections. This catches context that keyword search missed. - Time questions use time sources. For a date range, list the daily and synthesis notes in range with
obsidian__vault_list folder="Daily" changed_since="2026-07-01", then read them — plus completed tasks and dated table rows.
A search that returns nothing has answered the question. Do not re-run it a third way.
Recipes by Question Shape
- "What do I know about TOPIC" ->
obsidian__vault_search query="TOPIC" type="knowledge", then the topic's MOC note, then the notes it lists. Answer from the notes and name the ones used. - "What did PERSON and I discuss / what's pending with them" ->
obsidian__vault_read note="First Last" section="Conversation History"andsection="Pending Topics", thenobsidian__vault_links direction="in" note="First Last"for project notes that mention them. - "Why/when did we decide X" -> the project note's
## Key Decisionstable first, thenobsidian__vault_search. - "Summarize my week/month" -> daily notes and syntheses in range, tasks completed in range, project
## Conversation Logrows in range. - "What am I waiting on / what's stale" -> that is
standup's shape. Runstanduprather than reinventing it.
Answer Style
- Answer first, then sources: name the notes used so the user can jump in.
- Quote the user's own recorded wording for decisions and journal content; do not paraphrase it into new claims.
- "The vault says nothing about this" is a real answer — say which places were checked. Distinguish it from "found but thin."
- Never fill a gap from general knowledge without labelling it as outside the vault.
Privacy
Journal and people-note content is sensitive: answer in the current direct channel only, include the minimum detail that answers the question, and never surface private details in group or public channels.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

