meeting-notes
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Turn a meeting transcript, dictated recap, or bullet notes (including voice bridge output) into a meeting note, project decisions, action items, and person conversation history. Owns ingestion of raw meeting/voice material only. NOT for: the meeting note's own shape or the project's sections (project-tracking), the person note's shape (people-notes), or task mechanics beyond adding the item (task-tracking).
55 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- t128n/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- desertcache/agent-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- juliomrqz/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AgnesAI-Labs/agnet-skills-cntheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Works-HQ/ai-brain-starter-packtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Rome-1/obsidian-claude-startertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use email-draft, status-report and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
yakatotechSkillemail-draft
Create business email drafts. Use when asked to draft emails
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstatus-report
Generate a status report with KPIs, risks, and action items. Use when writing a weekly or monthly update for leadership, summarizing project health with green/yellow/red status, surfacing risks and decisions that need stakeholder attention, or turning a pile of project tracker activity into a readable narrative.
Also in 3 projects that use this
vijpatel7Skillcold-outreach
Write highly effective cold emails and LinkedIn messages to recruiters, hiring managers, founders, and engineers at target companies. Based on Ben Lang's proven cold outreach framework (Next Play). Use when the user wants to: (1) write a cold email to someone at a company they want to work for, (2) craft LinkedIn messages or InMail to recruiters or hiring managers, (3) reach out about unadvertised positions, (4) follow up on outreach or applications, (5) network with founders or executives for job opportunities, (6) prepare an outreach campaign to multiple companies. Triggers on: cold email, outreach, reach out to, contact recruiter, email founder, write to hiring manager, job email, networking email, LinkedIn message, InMail.
Also in 3 projects that use this
LangChainSkillweb-research
Use this skill for requests related to web research; it provides a structured approach to conducting comprehensive web research
Also in 4 projects that use this
jacobraskSkillcalendar
Interact with Apple Calendar via AppleScript. Use when the user asks to check calendar, view events, create events, manage schedule, find free time, or list calendars. Triggers include "my calendar", "my schedule", "calendar events", "create event", "add to calendar", "what's on my calendar", "free time", "available slots", "upcoming events", "today's events". Requires macOS with Calendar.app.
Also in 3 projects that use this
LangChainSkillcompetitor-analysis
Analyze competitors in a given market segment. Trigger on: competitive landscape, competitor analysis, market comparison, competitive positioning.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions55 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 55
- mergisi/awesome-openclaw-agents★ 4.1ksame name
- shiwenwen/hope-agent★ 1.9ksame name
- claude-office-skills/skills★ 433same name
- zrosenfield/sharepoint-ai-skills★ 96same name
- duncan-buildroom/freeskills★ 65same name
- jezweb/vite-flare-starter★ 49same name
- nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection★ 33same name
- charlie947/life-automation-skills★ 25same name
- arezous/pm-pilot★ 20same name
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGroup★ 18same name
45 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- daily-journalSkill
- goalsSkill
- idea-pipelineSkill
- knowledge-baseSkill
- nightly-consolidationSkill
- people-notesSkill
- project-trackingSkill
- resurfacingSkill
- second-brainSkill
- shopping-listSkill
- skill-tuningSkill
- standupSkill
- task-trackingSkill
- vault-recallSkill
- weekly-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 43 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 56
Route decisions to the project: Every decision also gets a row in the project's ## Key Decisions (not just the meeting note — that table is …
- Distinctive: line 113
Do not invent a project, a person, a decision, or a date.
- Very specific: line 114
Do not create a person note from a single meeting mention — that is people-notes' call to make from durable, non-meeting-first-contact …
- Distinctive: line 115
Do not paste transcript text at length into any note.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 43 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Meeting and Voice Ingestion
Turn raw meeting material into vault writes through the existing tools. This skill owns ingestion — deciding what a transcript contains and where each piece goes. It does not define note shapes: read project-tracking for the meeting note template and the project's ## Key Decisions / ## Conversation Log, and people-notes for the person note's ## Conversation History row shape, before using either. Use second-brain for the tool surface and the Inbox.md capture convention.
Inputs
Three shapes of raw material, all handled the same way from here on:
- A verbatim transcript.
- A dictated recap (spoken summary of a meeting that already happened).
- Bullet notes typed or pasted in.
Voice-Specific Handling
Material from the voice bridge needs cleanup before anything is written, not literal transcription into the vault:
- It arrives lowercase and unpunctuated. Never paste it into a note as-is — summarize into normal sentences and title case where a heading or wikilink needs it.
- Names are frequently misheard ("alex riviera" for an existing "Alex Rivera", or a name with no match at all). Treat a heard name as a candidate, not a fact — confirm it against the vault before writing anything under it.
- Dates are relative ("next friday", "end of month"). Call
obsidian__vault_statusfirst in every capture for orientation, thenobsidian__date_resolvefor each relative date and pass itsdatetoobsidian__task_add— the tool rejects anything else, and an unresolved "next friday" is not a validdue.
Workflow
- Orient.
obsidian__vault_status— get today's date for resolving relative dates. Identify the project.
obsidian__vault_list type="project"and match the meeting's project by exact name (case-insensitive; do not fuzzy-guess a misheard project name the way you would a person's). If it matches, proceed normally. If nothing matches, do not invent a project note —obsidian__note_create type="meeting"has no way to leaveprojectunset, so there is no partial meeting note to create. Route the whole capture, summarized, to the inbox and stop there for this capture:obsidian__inbox_add content="dictated recap mentioning 'Riverside kickoff'" context="no matching project note; route once one exists"obsidian__inbox_adddates the line and createsInbox.mdif it does not exist yet;obsidian__inbox_routethen moves the line out once a matching project exists.- Resolve attendees. For each name heard, check
obsidian__vault_list type="person"andobsidian__vault_search query="…" type="person"before deciding. A confirmed match gets wikilinked in the meeting note's## Attendees. A name heard once with no match — including a plausible mishearing of an existing name that still doesn't check out — goes under a## Unresolvedsection on the meeting note (append withcreate_sectionset, since it is not part of the standard template). Never create a person note from a single meeting mention. Create the meeting note, per
project-tracking:obsidian__note_create type="meeting" name="2026-08-03 Example Project Sync" project="Example Project" fields={"people":"Jane Doe"}obsidian__note_createnever overwrites — if it returnscreated: false, the note already exists; append to it instead of retrying the create.- Fill the meeting note. Attendees, a short Discussion summary, and its own Decisions / Action Items — brief, in your own words. Quote the transcript verbatim only for the wording of a decision when the exact phrasing matters, and even then keep it to a short fragment; everything else is a summary.
Route decisions to the project. Every decision also gets a row in the project's
## Key Decisions(not just the meeting note — that table is the source project state reads from):obsidian__section_append note="Example Project" section="Key Decisions" content="| 2026-08-03 | Delay launch by one week | Accommodate legal review |"Route action items to tasks. One
obsidian__task_addper concrete action item, with the project wikilink and a due date only when one was actually stated — resolve a stated relative date withobsidian__date_resolvefirst and pass itsdate; an unclear date goes innotes, never invented. When the item is owed to the user by someone present, usewaiting_onwith their resolved person name:obsidian__task_add text="Send the vendor quote" project="Example Project" notes="Alex Rivera (name unconfirmed)" obsidian__date_resolve expression="next friday" obsidian__task_add text="Review the contract" project="Example Project" due="2026-08-07" waiting_on="Jane Doe"- Route open questions to the meeting note. Anything raised but not settled goes under a
## Open Questionssection on the meeting note (append withcreate_sectionset), not into the project or a task. Log the conversation. For the project: a
## Conversation Logrow pointing at the meeting note. For each matched attendee: one## Conversation Historyrow on their person note (the people-notes row shape) — never more than one row per attendee per meeting.obsidian__section_append note="Example Project" section="Conversation Log" content="| 2026-08-03 | Jane Doe | [[2026-08-03 Example Project Sync]] — decisions and action items logged |" obsidian__section_append note="Jane Doe" section="Conversation History" content="| 2026-08-03 | Example Project sync | Reviewing the contract; due 2026-08-07 |"- Reply. One paragraph: what was written, as wikilinks to the notes touched, and what was left unresolved (unmatched names, undated action items, open questions). No transcript dump.
Worked Example
Dictated recap (voice bridge, as received):
"recap of the example project sync today with jane doe and a guy named alex riviera we decided to delay the launch by one week to accommodate legal review alex is going to send the vendor quote no date given jane is going to review the contract by next friday open question is whether legal needs to sign off before we send it"
obsidian__vault_status reports today: "2026-08-03"; obsidian__date_resolve expression="next friday" resolves that to 2026-08-07.
obsidian__vault_status
obsidian__date_resolve expression="next friday"
obsidian__vault_list type="project"
obsidian__vault_list type="person"
obsidian__vault_search query="alex" type="person"
obsidian__note_create type="meeting" name="2026-08-03 Example Project Sync" project="Example Project" fields={"people":"Jane Doe"}
obsidian__section_append note="2026-08-03 Example Project Sync" section="Attendees" content="- [[Jane Doe]]"
obsidian__section_append note="2026-08-03 Example Project Sync" section="Unresolved" content="- Heard 'Alex Riviera' once; no matching person note via vault_list or vault_search — left unresolved, no person note created." create_section=true
obsidian__section_append note="2026-08-03 Example Project Sync" section="Discussion" content="- Launch timeline and contract review status."
obsidian__section_append note="2026-08-03 Example Project Sync" section="Decisions" content="- Delay launch by one week to accommodate legal review."
obsidian__section_append note="2026-08-03 Example Project Sync" section="Action Items" content="- Send the vendor quote (Alex Rivera, unconfirmed) — no date given.\n- Review the contract (Jane Doe) — due 2026-08-07."
obsidian__section_append note="2026-08-03 Example Project Sync" section="Open Questions" content="- Does legal need to sign off before the contract goes out?" create_section=true
obsidian__section_append note="Example Project" section="Key Decisions" content="| 2026-08-03 | Delay launch by one week | Accommodate legal review |"
obsidian__section_append note="Example Project" section="Conversation Log" content="| 2026-08-03 | Jane Doe | [[2026-08-03 Example Project Sync]] — decisions and action items logged |"
obsidian__task_add text="Send the vendor quote" project="Example Project" notes="Alex Rivera (name unconfirmed)"
obsidian__task_add text="Review the contract" project="Example Project" due="2026-08-07" waiting_on="Jane Doe"
obsidian__section_append note="Jane Doe" section="Conversation History" content="| 2026-08-03 | Example Project sync | Reviewing the contract; due 2026-08-07 |"Reply: "Logged [[2026-08-03 Example Project Sync]] for [[Example Project]]: decided to delay launch a week for legal review, added a Conversation Log entry and a Key Decisions row, and filed two tasks (vendor quote — no date given; contract review, due 2026-08-07, waiting on [[Jane Doe]]). 'Alex Riviera' didn't match an existing person note, so attendance is under Unresolved rather than a new person file. One open question — legal sign-off — is on the meeting note."
Safety
- Do not invent a project, a person, a decision, or a date. An unresolved name, an unstated due date, and an unmatched project are all facts to surface, not gaps to fill in.
- Do not create a person note from a single meeting mention — that is
people-notes' call to make from durable, non-meeting-first-contact information. - Do not paste transcript text at length into any note. A short verbatim fragment on a decision is the one exception, and only when the exact wording matters.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

