agentleFS
joinwell52-AIjoinwell52-AI/CodeFlowMu-open/skills/ui-usability-acceptance/SKILL.md

ui-usability-acceptance

Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Accept or reject CodeFlowMu UI changes based on usability evidence. Use when QA, PM, or UI reviewer needs desktop/mobile checks, interaction results, visual overlap checks, and FCoP semantic correctness.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use after UI implementation or when reviewing a UI report.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Check the workflow, not just screenshots.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify desktop and mobile where relevant.

    line 15
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not accept untested interactions.

    line 25
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not ignore mobile overlap.

    line 26
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not archive or approve lifecycle from UI review alone.

    line 27

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

UI Usability Acceptance

When to use

Use after UI implementation or when reviewing a UI report.

Rules

  • Check the workflow, not just screenshots.
  • Verify desktop and mobile where relevant.
  • Record interaction results and evidence.
  • Reject UI that misstates lifecycle, task, report, or review state.

Required output

Use docs/skills/ui-playbook/usability-acceptance.md.

Forbidden actions

  • Do not accept untested interactions.
  • Do not ignore mobile overlap.
  • Do not archive or approve lifecycle from UI review alone.

Minimal example

Viewport: 390x844
Interaction: open report details
Result: pass
Evidence: screenshot path

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.