qa-regression-check
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Check plausible regressions from a CodeFlowMu change. Use when QA needs to identify impacted workflows, run focused checks, and record gaps without expanding into full-system audit.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- architect-boundary-reviewSkill
- architect-decision-recordSkill
- architect-system-designSkill
- browser-playwright-checkSkill
- browser-useSkill
- code-search-navigationSkill
- controlled-emergence-observerSkill
- dev-code-locationSkill
- dev-small-scope-patchSkill
- dev-test-and-explainSkill
- eval-observation-writingSkill
- eval-promotion-adviceSkill
- eval-risk-gap-analysisSkill
- ops-log-diagnosisSkill
- ops-runtime-healthSkill
- ops-stuck-workflowSkill
- pm-acceptance-criteriaSkill
- pm-architecture-reviewSkill
- pm-delivery-planSkill
- pm-evolve-skillsSkill
- pm-long-horizon-planningSkill
- pm-priority-triageSkill
- pm-product-design-briefSkill
- pm-product-requirementsSkill
- pm-scope-controlSkill
- pm-solve-problemsSkill
- pm-tech-scopeSkill
- qa-reproduce-issueSkill
- qa-verify-fixSkill
- run-local-command-checkSkill
- test-selectionSkill
- tm-delivery-governanceSkill
- tm-review-routingSkill
- tm-risk-dependencySkill
- ui-information-architectureSkill
- ui-requirementsSkill
- ui-usability-acceptanceSkill
- ui-visual-consistencySkill
- web-extractSkill
- web-researchSkill
- web-searchSkill
- windows-useSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use when a change may affect nearby workflows.
- Distinctive: line 15
Keep regression scope focused.
- Distinctive: line 25
Do not expand into full audit unless tasked.
- Distinctive: line 26
Do not claim untested workflows are safe.
- Distinctive: line 27
Do not mutate lifecycle.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
QA Regression Check
When to use
Use when a change may affect nearby workflows.
Rules
- Define impacted workflows.
- Keep regression scope focused.
- Record gaps honestly.
- Escalate broad audit requests to PM.
Required output
Use docs/skills/qa-playbook/regression-check.md.
Forbidden actions
- Do not expand into full audit unless tasked.
- Do not claim untested workflows are safe.
- Do not mutate lifecycle.
Minimal example
Workflow: skill validation
Why impacted: new SKILL.md folders
Check: quick_validate.py over skills/*Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.