run-local-command-check
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when an agent needs to run a local command for verification, diagnostics, tests, builds, typechecks, scripts, or CLI behavior and must report truthful command evidence.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- architect-boundary-reviewSkill
- architect-decision-recordSkill
- architect-system-designSkill
- browser-playwright-checkSkill
- browser-useSkill
- code-search-navigationSkill
- controlled-emergence-observerSkill
- dev-code-locationSkill
- dev-small-scope-patchSkill
- dev-test-and-explainSkill
- eval-observation-writingSkill
- eval-promotion-adviceSkill
- eval-risk-gap-analysisSkill
- ops-log-diagnosisSkill
- ops-runtime-healthSkill
- ops-stuck-workflowSkill
- pm-acceptance-criteriaSkill
- pm-architecture-reviewSkill
- pm-delivery-planSkill
- pm-evolve-skillsSkill
- pm-long-horizon-planningSkill
- pm-priority-triageSkill
- pm-product-design-briefSkill
- pm-product-requirementsSkill
- pm-scope-controlSkill
- pm-solve-problemsSkill
- pm-tech-scopeSkill
- qa-regression-checkSkill
- qa-reproduce-issueSkill
- qa-verify-fixSkill
- test-selectionSkill
- tm-delivery-governanceSkill
- tm-review-routingSkill
- tm-risk-dependencySkill
- ui-information-architectureSkill
- ui-requirementsSkill
- ui-usability-acceptanceSkill
- ui-visual-consistencySkill
- web-extractSkill
- web-researchSkill
- web-searchSkill
- windows-useSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use before running commands that produce evidence for a task, especially tests, typechecks, builds, local scripts, CLI diagnostics, or …
- Distinctive: line 16
Prefer the smallest command that verifies the claim.
- Distinctive: line 17
Run commands from the correct workspace directory.
- Distinctive: line 19
Treat failure output as evidence, not as something to hide.
- Distinctive: line 20
Do not claim success if a command failed or was not run.
- Distinctive: line 21
Avoid destructive commands unless the task explicitly authorizes them.
- Distinctive: line 35
Do not fabricate command output.
- Distinctive: line 36
Do not run broad or slow checks when a narrow check is enough unless risk justifies it.
- Distinctive: line 37
Do not use command success alone as proof of UI or product correctness when browser or manual behavior matters.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Run Local Command Check
When to use
Use before running commands that produce evidence for a task, especially tests, typechecks, builds, local scripts, CLI diagnostics, or health checks.
Rules
- State the command purpose before relying on its output.
- Prefer the smallest command that verifies the claim.
- Run commands from the correct workspace directory.
- Capture the command, exit status, and key output.
- Treat failure output as evidence, not as something to hide.
- Do not claim success if a command failed or was not run.
- Avoid destructive commands unless the task explicitly authorizes them.
Required output
When reporting, include:
- Command.
- Working directory.
- Result: pass, fail, skipped, or blocked.
- Key output lines or a concise summary.
- Any follow-up risk from skipped checks.
Forbidden actions
- Do not fabricate command output.
- Do not run broad or slow checks when a narrow check is enough unless risk justifies it.
- Do not use command success alone as proof of UI or product correctness when browser or manual behavior matters.
Minimal example
Command: npm --prefix packages/codeflowmu-runtime test
Purpose: verify runtime unit tests after router change
Result: pass
Evidence: 280 tests passed, 0 failedDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

