eval-risk-gap-analysis
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Analyze CodeFlowMu risks and gaps from EVAL findings. Use when EVAL needs to classify expected vs actual behavior, risk type, severity recommendation, evidence, and owner.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- architect-boundary-reviewSkill
- architect-decision-recordSkill
- architect-system-designSkill
- browser-playwright-checkSkill
- browser-useSkill
- code-search-navigationSkill
- controlled-emergence-observerSkill
- dev-code-locationSkill
- dev-small-scope-patchSkill
- dev-test-and-explainSkill
- eval-observation-writingSkill
- eval-promotion-adviceSkill
- ops-log-diagnosisSkill
- ops-runtime-healthSkill
- ops-stuck-workflowSkill
- pm-acceptance-criteriaSkill
- pm-architecture-reviewSkill
- pm-delivery-planSkill
- pm-evolve-skillsSkill
- pm-long-horizon-planningSkill
- pm-priority-triageSkill
- pm-product-design-briefSkill
- pm-product-requirementsSkill
- pm-scope-controlSkill
- pm-solve-problemsSkill
- pm-tech-scopeSkill
- qa-regression-checkSkill
- qa-reproduce-issueSkill
- qa-verify-fixSkill
- run-local-command-checkSkill
- test-selectionSkill
- tm-delivery-governanceSkill
- tm-review-routingSkill
- tm-risk-dependencySkill
- ui-information-architectureSkill
- ui-requirementsSkill
- ui-usability-acceptanceSkill
- ui-visual-consistencySkill
- web-extractSkill
- web-researchSkill
- web-searchSkill
- windows-useSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use when an observation needs severity and owner classification.
- Distinctive: line 17
Keep recommendation separate from ADMIN decision.
- Distinctive: line 25
Do not create public issues automatically.
- Distinctive: line 26
Do not confuse local gaps with formal protocol gaps.
- Distinctive: line 27
Do not decide governance outcome.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
EVAL Risk and Gap Analysis
When to use
Use when an observation needs severity and owner classification.
Rules
- Compare expected and actual behavior.
- Classify risk type.
- Recommend P0/P1/P2 with reason.
- Keep recommendation separate from ADMIN decision.
Required output
Use docs/skills/eval-playbook/risk-gap-analysis.md.
Forbidden actions
- Do not create public issues automatically.
- Do not confuse local gaps with formal protocol gaps.
- Do not decide governance outcome.
Minimal example
Risk type: docs
Severity: P2
Owner: DEV
Reason: discoverability issue, not runtime blockerDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.