agentleFS
jmylchreestjmylchreest/aide/skills/verify/SKILL.md

verify

Skill19 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Active QA verification - full validation before completion

188 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-export

    Export instincts from project/global scope to a file

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-import

    Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AviadPSkill

    risk-assess

    Assess the risk and blast radius of a proposed code change before implementing it. Evaluates CI impact, framework-wide vs localized scope, rollback path, and identifies blindspots. Use when user says "what's the risk", "is this safe", "assess the impact", "risk assess", "blast radius", or before applying framework-wide or CI-affecting changes. Do NOT use for code quality review (use code-quality) or plan validation (use design-validator).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AaravChadhaSkill

    secure

    Security review with a confidence gate - a finding exists only with a concrete exploit scenario and a high/medium/low confidence rating; everything else goes to a worth-hardening list, never inflated. Sweeps five surfaces: auth gates, secrets hygiene, injection and unsafe sinks, unsafe deserialization/crypto/transport, and LLM tool-use trust boundaries. Reports only, never fixes. Use when the user asks for a security review or to check vulnerabilities, secrets, or auth.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ArvorCoSkill

    specify

    Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • Jurel89Skill

    ai-slop-cleaner

    Clean AI-generated code slop with a regression-safe, deletion-first workflow and optional reviewer-only mode

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +1 more from TheKREATORS

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 12

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run ALL of the following. Each must pass.

    line 27
  2. Distinctive:

    Expected: All tests pass, no failures, no skipped tests.

    line 42
  3. Distinctive:

    Expected: No type errors.

    line 57
  4. Distinctive:

    Expected: No lint errors. Warnings acceptable if pre-existing.

    line 73
  5. Distinctive:

    Search for common debug artifacts that shouldn't be committed:

    line 92
  6. Distinctive:

    Expected: No debug artifacts in new code.

    line 111
  7. Distinctive:

    Create a verification report.

    line 144
  8. Distinctive:

    Document which tests fail and why

    line 220
  9. Very specific:

    Do NOT fix them yourself (that's BUILD-FIX stage (via /aide:build-fix))

    line 221
  10. Distinctive:

    Document all lint errors

    line 227
  11. Distinctive:

    Document all type errors with file:line

    line 234
  12. Distinctive:

    Always FAIL on type errors

    line 235
  13. Distinctive:

    Always FAIL on build errors

    line 241
  14. Very specific:

    When FAIL, the BUILD-FIX stage (via /aide:build-fix) addresses issues, then VERIFY runs again.

    line 279

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Verify Mode

Recommended model tier: smart (opus) - this skill requires complex reasoning

Active QA verification: run all quality checks and report pass/fail status.

Purpose

This is the VERIFY stage of the SDLC pipeline. Implementation is complete. Your job is to run comprehensive validation and report results.

This is different from review: Review is read-only analysis. Verify is active execution of quality checks.

Verification Checklist

Run ALL of the following. Each must pass.

1. Full Test Suite

# TypeScript/JavaScript
npm test

# Go
go test ./...

# Python
pytest

Expected: All tests pass, no failures, no skipped tests.

2. Type Checking

# TypeScript
npx tsc --noEmit

# Go (implicit in build)
go build ./...

# Python (if using mypy)
mypy .

Expected: No type errors.

3. Linting

# TypeScript/JavaScript
npm run lint

# Go
go vet ./...
golangci-lint run

# Python
ruff check .

Expected: No lint errors. Warnings acceptable if pre-existing.

4. Build

# TypeScript/JavaScript
npm run build

# Go
go build ./...

# Python
python -m py_compile *.py

Expected: Build succeeds without errors.

5. Debug Artifact Check

Search for common debug artifacts that shouldn't be committed:

# Console logs (JS/TS)
Grep for "console.log" in changed files

# Debug prints (Go)
Grep for "fmt.Println" or "log.Print" that look like debug

# Python debug
Grep for "print(" or "pdb" or "breakpoint()"

# TODO/FIXME comments
Grep for "TODO" or "FIXME" in changed files

# Debugger statements
Grep for "debugger" in JS/TS files

Expected: No debug artifacts in new code. Pre-existing ones noted but not blocking.

6. Uncommitted Changes Check

git status

Expected: Working directory clean, or only expected files modified.

Workflow

Step 1: Run All Checks

Execute each check in sequence, capturing output:

# Run all checks, capture results
npm test 2>&1 | head -50
npm run lint 2>&1 | head -50
npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1 | head -50
npm run build 2>&1 | head -50

Step 2: Check for Debug Artifacts

# Search for debug code in recently changed files
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 | xargs grep -l "console.log\|debugger" 2>/dev/null || true

Step 3: Compile Results

Create a verification report.

Output Format

All Checks Pass

## Verification Report: PASS

### Tests
- Status: PASS
- Total: 42
- Passed: 42
- Failed: 0

### Type Check
- Status: PASS
- Errors: 0

### Lint
- Status: PASS
- Errors: 0
- Warnings: 3 (pre-existing)

### Build
- Status: PASS

### Debug Artifacts
- Status: CLEAN
- No debug code found in new files

### Verdict: READY FOR DOCS STAGE

Some Checks Fail

## Verification Report: FAIL

### Tests
- Status: FAIL
- Total: 42
- Passed: 40
- Failed: 2
- Failures:
  - `UserService.test.ts:45` - expected 200, got 401
  - `AuthMiddleware.test.ts:23` - timeout after 5000ms

### Type Check
- Status: PASS

### Lint
- Status: FAIL
- Errors:
  - `src/user.ts:12` - 'unused' is defined but never used

### Build
- Status: PASS

### Debug Artifacts
- Status: WARNING
- Found:
  - `src/user.ts:34` - console.log("debug user:", user)

### Verdict: NEEDS BUILD-FIX

Issues to resolve:
1. Fix 2 failing tests
2. Remove console.log on line 34
3. Fix lint error (remove unused variable)

Failure Handling

Tests Fail

  1. Document which tests fail and why
  2. Do NOT fix them yourself (that's BUILD-FIX stage (via /aide:build-fix))
  3. Report failures clearly
  4. Verdict: FAIL, needs BUILD-FIX stage (via /aide:build-fix)

Lint Errors

  1. Document all lint errors
  2. Distinguish new errors from pre-existing
  3. New errors = FAIL
  4. Pre-existing warnings = PASS with notes

Type Errors

  1. Document all type errors with file:line
  2. Always FAIL on type errors
  3. Type errors must be fixed before proceeding

Build Fails

  1. Document build error
  2. Always FAIL on build errors
  3. Critical blocker for release

Decision Tree

All tests pass?
├── No → FAIL (needs BUILD-FIX)
└── Yes → Type check pass?
          ├── No → FAIL (needs BUILD-FIX)
          └── Yes → Lint pass?
                    ├── No (new errors) → FAIL (needs BUILD-FIX)
                    └── Yes/Warnings only → Build pass?
                                           ├── No → FAIL (needs BUILD-FIX)
                                           └── Yes → Debug artifacts?
                                                     ├── Found → FAIL (needs cleanup)
                                                     └── Clean → PASS

Completion

On PASS

Verification complete: ALL CHECKS PASS
Ready for DOCS stage.

On FAIL

Verification complete: CHECKS FAILED
Returning to BUILD-FIX stage (via `/aide:build-fix`).

Issues:
1. [list of issues]

When FAIL, the BUILD-FIX stage (via /aide:build-fix) addresses issues, then VERIFY runs again.

Integration with SDLC Pipeline

[DESIGN] → [TEST] → [DEV] → [VERIFY] → [DOCS]
                               ↑
                          YOU ARE HERE
                               │
                    ┌──────────┴──────────┐
                    │                     │
                  PASS                  FAIL
                    │                     │
                    ▼                     ▼
                 [DOCS]               [BUILD-FIX] → [VERIFY]
  • Input: Completed implementation from DEV stage
  • Output: Pass/Fail report with specifics
  • On Pass: Proceed to DOCS stage
  • On Fail: Return to BUILD-FIX stage (via /aide:build-fix), then re-verify

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.