test
Skill19 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write and run tests for code
179 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- tyrantpiper/travel-pwatheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- phuthuycoding/kanban-flowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pche-broken-artist/forge-of-thoughttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PMDevSolutions/Flaviantheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use agent-context-isolation, agentica-infrastructure and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
parcadeiSkillagent-context-isolation
Agent Context Isolation
Also in 3 projects that use this
parcadeiSkillagentica-infrastructure
Reference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +10 more from parcadei
Other versions179 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 179
- react/react★ 252ksame name
- facebook/react★ 252ksame name
- apache/skywalking★ 25ksame name
- livewire/livewire★ 24ksame name
- NVIDIA/TensorRT★ 13ksame name
- FalkorDB/FalkorDB★ 10ksame name
- FastLED/FastLED★ 7.5ksame name
- fleetdm/fleet★ 7.2ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
169 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- assess-findingsSkill
- autopilotSkill
- build-fixSkill
- code-searchSkill
- context-usageSkill
- debugSkill
- decideSkill
- designSkill
- docsSkill
- forgetSkill
- gitSkill
- implementSkill
- memoriseSkill
- patternsSkill
- perfSkill
- plan-swarmSkill
- recallSkill
- reflectSkill
- reviewSkill
- semgrepSkill
- surveySkill
- swarmSkill
- swarm-statusSkill
- verifySkill
- worktree-resolveSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 154 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Write comprehensive tests and run test suites.
- Very specific: line 28
Use the mcp__plugin_aide_aide__decision_get tool with topic testing to check for testing framework decisions.
- Very specific: line 38
Use Glob to find test files:
- Distinctive: line 44
Use Grep to find test patterns in existing test files:
- Distinctive: line 49
Read an existing test file to understand:
- Very specific: line 58
Use mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_symbols with the target file path to get function signatures.
- Very specific: line 59
Use mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_search to find related types.
- Distinctive: line 71
Follow the project's testing conventions.
- Distinctive: line 78
Async behavior: - If applicable
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 154 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test Mode
Recommended model tier: balanced (sonnet) - this skill performs straightforward operations
Write comprehensive tests and run test suites.
Prerequisites
Before starting:
- Identify the code to be tested (function, module, feature)
- Understand the testing framework used in the project
Workflow
Step 1: Check Project Testing Decisions
Use the mcp__plugin_aide_aide__decision_get tool with topic testing to check for testing framework decisions.
Common frameworks by language:
- TypeScript/JavaScript: Vitest, Jest, Mocha
- Go: built-in
go test - Python: pytest, unittest
Step 2: Discover Existing Test Patterns
Use Glob to find test files:
- Pattern:
**/*.test.ts,**/*.spec.ts(TypeScript) - Pattern:
**/*_test.go(Go) - Pattern:
**/test_*.py,**/*_test.py(Python)
Use Grep to find test patterns in existing test files:
Grep pattern="describe\(" include="*.test.*"— find test suitesGrep pattern="it\(|test\(" include="*.test.*"— find test cases
Read an existing test file to understand:
- Import patterns
- Setup/teardown patterns
- Mocking approach
- Assertion style
Step 3: Analyze Target Code
Use mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_symbols with the target file path to get function signatures.
Use mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_search to find related types.
Identify:
- Input parameters and types
- Return type
- Side effects
- Dependencies to mock
- Edge cases
Step 4: Write Tests
Follow the project's testing conventions. Cover these scenarios:
Test Categories:
- Happy path - Normal, expected inputs
- Edge cases - Empty, null, boundary values
- Error cases - Invalid inputs, expected failures
- Async behavior - If applicable
Naming convention:
- Descriptive names that explain what is being tested
- Format: "should [expected behavior] when [condition]"
Step 5: Run Tests
# TypeScript/JavaScript
npm test # Run all tests
npm test -- --grep "name" # Run specific test
npm run test:coverage # Run with coverage
# Go
go test ./... # Run all tests
go test -v ./pkg/... # Verbose output
go test -cover ./... # With coverage
# Python
pytest # Run all tests
pytest -v # Verbose
pytest --cov # With coverageStep 6: Verify Coverage
# Check coverage report
npm run test:coverage
# Go
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
go tool cover -html=coverage.outCoverage targets:
- New code: aim for >80%
- Critical paths: aim for >90%
- Focus on meaningful tests, not just coverage numbers
Failure Handling
| Failure | Action |
| Test imports fail | Check path aliases, ensure test config matches main |
| Mock not working | Verify mock setup, check dependency injection |
| Async test timeout | Add proper await, increase timeout if needed |
| Flaky test | Check for shared state, timing issues, or external deps |
| Coverage too low | Add edge case tests, error path tests |
Test Structure Templates
TypeScript/JavaScript (Vitest/Jest)
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from "vitest";
import { functionToTest } from "./module";
describe("functionToTest", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// Reset state before each test
vi.clearAllMocks();
});
it("should return expected result for valid input", () => {
const result = functionToTest("valid input");
expect(result).toBe("expected output");
});
it("should handle empty input", () => {
const result = functionToTest("");
expect(result).toBe("");
});
it("should throw error for null input", () => {
expect(() => functionToTest(null)).toThrow("Input required");
});
it("should handle async operation", async () => {
const result = await functionToTest("async input");
expect(result).resolves.toBe("async output");
});
});Go
func TestFunctionName(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
input string
want string
wantErr bool
}{
{"valid input", "input", "expected", false},
{"empty input", "", "", false},
{"invalid input", "bad", "", true},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got, err := FunctionName(tt.input)
if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
t.Errorf("error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr)
return
}
if got != tt.want {
t.Errorf("got = %v, want %v", got, tt.want)
}
})
}
}Python
import pytest
from module import function_to_test
class TestFunctionToTest:
def test_valid_input(self):
assert function_to_test("input") == "expected"
def test_empty_input(self):
assert function_to_test("") == ""
def test_invalid_input_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
function_to_test(None)
@pytest.fixture
def mock_dependency(self, mocker):
return mocker.patch("module.dependency")MCP Tools
mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_search- Find existing tests, patterns, typesmcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_symbols- Understand function signatures to testmcp__plugin_aide_aide__decision_get- Check testing framework decisions
Verification Criteria
Before completing:
- All new tests pass
- Existing tests still pass
- Coverage meets project standards
- Tests are deterministic (not flaky)
- Tests follow project conventions
Output Format
## Tests Added
### Files
- `path/to/file.test.ts` - 5 tests for UserService
### Test Cases
1. should create user with valid data
2. should reject duplicate email
3. should hash password before saving
4. should handle empty name
5. should validate email format
### Coverage
- New code: 92%
- Total project: 84%
### Verification
- All tests: PASS
- No flaky tests observedDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

