agentleFS
jmylchreestjmylchreest/aide/skills/test/SKILL.md

test

Skill19 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write and run tests for code

179 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use agent-context-isolation, agentica-infrastructure and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 154 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write comprehensive tests and run test suites.

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    Use the mcp__plugin_aide_aide__decision_get tool with topic testing to check for testing framework decisions.

    line 28
  3. Very specific:

    Use Glob to find test files:

    line 38
  4. Distinctive:

    Use Grep to find test patterns in existing test files:

    line 44
  5. Distinctive:

    Read an existing test file to understand:

    line 49
  6. Very specific:

    Use mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_symbols with the target file path to get function signatures.

    line 58
  7. Very specific:

    Use mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_search to find related types.

    line 59
  8. Distinctive:

    Follow the project's testing conventions.

    line 71
  9. Distinctive:

    Async behavior: - If applicable

    line 78

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 154 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Test Mode

Recommended model tier: balanced (sonnet) - this skill performs straightforward operations

Write comprehensive tests and run test suites.

Prerequisites

Before starting:

  • Identify the code to be tested (function, module, feature)
  • Understand the testing framework used in the project

Workflow

Step 1: Check Project Testing Decisions

Use the mcp__plugin_aide_aide__decision_get tool with topic testing to check for testing framework decisions.

Common frameworks by language:

  • TypeScript/JavaScript: Vitest, Jest, Mocha
  • Go: built-in go test
  • Python: pytest, unittest

Step 2: Discover Existing Test Patterns

Use Glob to find test files:

  • Pattern: **/*.test.ts, **/*.spec.ts (TypeScript)
  • Pattern: **/*_test.go (Go)
  • Pattern: **/test_*.py, **/*_test.py (Python)

Use Grep to find test patterns in existing test files:

  • Grep pattern="describe\(" include="*.test.*" — find test suites
  • Grep pattern="it\(|test\(" include="*.test.*" — find test cases

Read an existing test file to understand:

  • Import patterns
  • Setup/teardown patterns
  • Mocking approach
  • Assertion style

Step 3: Analyze Target Code

Use mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_symbols with the target file path to get function signatures. Use mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_search to find related types.

Identify:

  • Input parameters and types
  • Return type
  • Side effects
  • Dependencies to mock
  • Edge cases

Step 4: Write Tests

Follow the project's testing conventions. Cover these scenarios:

Test Categories:

  1. Happy path - Normal, expected inputs
  2. Edge cases - Empty, null, boundary values
  3. Error cases - Invalid inputs, expected failures
  4. Async behavior - If applicable

Naming convention:

  • Descriptive names that explain what is being tested
  • Format: "should [expected behavior] when [condition]"

Step 5: Run Tests

# TypeScript/JavaScript
npm test                    # Run all tests
npm test -- --grep "name"   # Run specific test
npm run test:coverage       # Run with coverage

# Go
go test ./...               # Run all tests
go test -v ./pkg/...        # Verbose output
go test -cover ./...        # With coverage

# Python
pytest                      # Run all tests
pytest -v                   # Verbose
pytest --cov                # With coverage

Step 6: Verify Coverage

# Check coverage report
npm run test:coverage

# Go
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
go tool cover -html=coverage.out

Coverage targets:

  • New code: aim for >80%
  • Critical paths: aim for >90%
  • Focus on meaningful tests, not just coverage numbers

Failure Handling

FailureAction
Test imports failCheck path aliases, ensure test config matches main
Mock not workingVerify mock setup, check dependency injection
Async test timeoutAdd proper await, increase timeout if needed
Flaky testCheck for shared state, timing issues, or external deps
Coverage too lowAdd edge case tests, error path tests

Test Structure Templates

TypeScript/JavaScript (Vitest/Jest)

import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from "vitest";
import { functionToTest } from "./module";

describe("functionToTest", () => {
  beforeEach(() => {
    // Reset state before each test
    vi.clearAllMocks();
  });

  it("should return expected result for valid input", () => {
    const result = functionToTest("valid input");
    expect(result).toBe("expected output");
  });

  it("should handle empty input", () => {
    const result = functionToTest("");
    expect(result).toBe("");
  });

  it("should throw error for null input", () => {
    expect(() => functionToTest(null)).toThrow("Input required");
  });

  it("should handle async operation", async () => {
    const result = await functionToTest("async input");
    expect(result).resolves.toBe("async output");
  });
});

Go

func TestFunctionName(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name    string
        input   string
        want    string
        wantErr bool
    }{
        {"valid input", "input", "expected", false},
        {"empty input", "", "", false},
        {"invalid input", "bad", "", true},
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got, err := FunctionName(tt.input)
            if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
                t.Errorf("error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr)
                return
            }
            if got != tt.want {
                t.Errorf("got = %v, want %v", got, tt.want)
            }
        })
    }
}

Python

import pytest
from module import function_to_test

class TestFunctionToTest:
    def test_valid_input(self):
        assert function_to_test("input") == "expected"

    def test_empty_input(self):
        assert function_to_test("") == ""

    def test_invalid_input_raises(self):
        with pytest.raises(ValueError):
            function_to_test(None)

    @pytest.fixture
    def mock_dependency(self, mocker):
        return mocker.patch("module.dependency")

MCP Tools

  • mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_search - Find existing tests, patterns, types
  • mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_symbols - Understand function signatures to test
  • mcp__plugin_aide_aide__decision_get - Check testing framework decisions

Verification Criteria

Before completing:

  • All new tests pass
  • Existing tests still pass
  • Coverage meets project standards
  • Tests are deterministic (not flaky)
  • Tests follow project conventions

Output Format

## Tests Added

### Files

- `path/to/file.test.ts` - 5 tests for UserService

### Test Cases

1. should create user with valid data
2. should reject duplicate email
3. should hash password before saving
4. should handle empty name
5. should validate email format

### Coverage

- New code: 92%
- Total project: 84%

### Verification

- All tests: PASS
- No flaky tests observed

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.