survey
Skill19 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Explore codebase structure, entry points, tech stack, hotspots, and call graphs
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- genkovich/sddtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- PKU-DAIR/AutoScitheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- wheslleyrimar/BuildCLI-Agentstheir own version, first seen Oct 22, 2026
- LazyerIJ/self-clonetheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- steven112163/dotharnesstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- DAIR-AutoResearch/AutoScitheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
LambenthanSkilldaily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新
Also in 5 projects that use this
LambenthanSkillexp-eval
实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges
Also in 5 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-eval
Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-run
Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
phanghonghaoSkillposter
HTML/CSS A4 海报生成。从沙龙/活动 Markdown 文件生成科技风 A4 海报 PDF/PNG。Use when user mentions: poster, 海报, 海报生成, make poster, generate poster, 活动海报, 沙龙海报.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +6 more from Lambenthan
- +1 more from skyllwt
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- skyllwt/OmegaWiki★ 1.7ksame name
- DAIR-AutoResearch/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- PKU-DAIR/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- skyllwt/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- genkovich/sdd★ 187same name
- SNL-UCSB/literature-survey-skill★ 93same name
- Lambenthan/empiricalwiki★ 85same name
- spacedock-dev/spacedock★ 85same name
- V-Songbird/foreman★ 35same name
- wheslleyrimar/BuildCLI-Agents★ 3same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- assess-findingsSkill
- autopilotSkill
- build-fixSkill
- code-searchSkill
- context-usageSkill
- debugSkill
- decideSkill
- designSkill
- docsSkill
- forgetSkill
- gitSkill
- implementSkill
- memoriseSkill
- patternsSkill
- perfSkill
- plan-swarmSkill
- recallSkill
- reflectSkill
- reviewSkill
- semgrepSkill
- swarmSkill
- swarm-statusSkill
- testSkill
- verifySkill
- worktree-resolveSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 42
If freshness shows an analyzer is commits behind HEAD, re-run survey_run before trusting its data.
- Distinctive: line 46
Run analyzers to populate survey data.
- Very specific: line 127
Use survey_stats to see if data exists
- Very specific: line 128
If empty, run survey_run to populate
- Very specific: line 144
Use direction=callers to find who invokes a function
- Very specific: line 145
Use direction=callees to understand what a function depends on
- Very specific: line 171
Survey data: Run aide survey run or use survey_run tool
- Very specific: line 172
Code index (for entrypoints + graph): Run aide code index
- Distinctive: line 173
Git history (for churn): Must be a git repository (uses go-git, no git binary needed)
- Distinctive: line 183
Call graph is computed on demand from the code index (not stored)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Codebase Survey
Recommended model tier: balanced (sonnet) - this skill performs structured queries
Understand the structure, technology, entry points, and change hotspots of a codebase.
Survey describes WHAT the codebase IS — not code problems (use findings for that).
Available Tools
1. Survey Stats (mcp__plugin_aide_aide__survey_stats)
Start here. Get an overview of what has been surveyed: total entries, breakdown by analyzer and kind, and per-analyzer freshness (the git commit each analyzer last ran at, and how many commits behind HEAD it is).
Is the codebase surveyed?
→ Uses survey_stats
→ Returns: counts by analyzer (topology, entrypoints, churn, modules) and kind, plus freshness vs git HEADIf freshness shows an analyzer is commits behind HEAD, re-run survey_run before trusting its data.
2. Survey Run (mcp__plugin_aide_aide__survey_run)
Run analyzers to populate survey data. Three analyzers available:
- topology — Packages, workspaces, build systems, tech stack detection (filesystem view)
- entrypoints — main() functions, HTTP handlers, gRPC services, CLI roots (cobra/urfave). Uses code index when available; falls back to file scanning
- churn — Git history hotspots (files/dirs that change most often)
- modules — Structural modules discovered by clustering the import/reference graph: what files actually belong together, which directory layout can hide. Requires the code index (
aide code index)
Survey this codebase
→ Uses survey_run (no analyzer param = run all)
→ Returns: entry counts per analyzer, an added/removed diff vs the previous run, and the git commit the run is tagged with3. Survey List (mcp__plugin_aide_aide__survey_list)
Browse entries filtered by analyzer, kind, or file path. No search query needed.
Kinds: module, entrypoint, dependency, tech_stack, churn, submodule, subproject, workspace, arch_pattern
What other projects live inside this repo?
→ Uses survey_list with kind=subproject
→ Returns: child project scopes (submodules, nested repos) with identity and whether each has its own .aide store — their files belong to THEIR stores, not this project'sWhat modules are in this codebase?
→ Uses survey_list with kind=module
→ Returns: all module entries
What technologies does this use?
→ Uses survey_list with kind=tech_stack
→ Returns: detected frameworks, languages, build systems
What files change most?
→ Uses survey_list with kind=churn
→ Returns: high-churn files ranked by commit count4. Survey Search (mcp__plugin_aide_aide__survey_search)
Full-text search across entry names, titles, and details. Use when looking for specific modules or technologies.
Find anything related to "auth"
→ Uses survey_search with query="auth"
→ Returns: modules, entrypoints, churn entries matching "auth"5. Call Graph (mcp__plugin_aide_aide__survey_graph)
Build a call graph for a symbol showing callers, callees, or both. BFS traversal over the code index.
Who calls BuildCallGraph?
→ Uses survey_graph with symbol="BuildCallGraph" direction="callers"
→ Returns: graph of calling symbols with file:line locations
What does handleSurveyRun call?
→ Uses survey_graph with symbol="handleSurveyRun" direction="callees"
→ Returns: graph of called symbols
Show call neighborhood of RunTopology
→ Uses survey_graph with symbol="RunTopology" direction="both"
→ Returns: both callers and calleesParameters:
symbol(required): Function/method namedirection: "both" (default), "callers", "callees"max_depth: BFS hops (default 2)max_nodes: Max nodes (default 50)
Requires: Code index must be populated (aide code index).
Workflow
Orienting in an unfamiliar codebase
- Check survey status:
- Use
survey_statsto see if data exists - If empty, run
survey_runto populate
- Use
- Understand the structure:
survey_list kind=module— What are the major modules?survey_list kind=tech_stack— What technologies are used?survey_list kind=workspace— Is this a monorepo?
- Find entry points:
survey_list kind=entrypoint— Where does execution start?- Identifies main() functions, HTTP handlers, CLI roots
- Identify hotspots:
survey_list kind=churn— What files change most? (complexity/bug magnets)
- Trace call relationships:
survey_graph symbol="handleRequest"— Map the call neighborhood- Use
direction=callersto find who invokes a function - Use
direction=calleesto understand what a function depends on
Answering specific questions
| Question | Tool | Parameters |
| "What is this codebase?" | survey_list | kind=module |
| "What tech stack?" | survey_list | kind=tech_stack |
| "Where are the entry points?" | survey_list | kind=entrypoint |
| "What changes most?" | survey_list | kind=churn |
| "Is there an auth module?" | survey_search | query="auth" |
| "Who calls this function?" | survey_graph | symbol=X, direction=callers |
| "What does this call?" | survey_graph | symbol=X, direction=callees |
Survey vs Findings vs Code Search
| Tool | Purpose | Example |
| Survey | WHAT the codebase IS | Modules, tech stack, entry points, churn |
| Findings | Code PROBLEMS | Complexity, security issues, duplication |
| Code Search | Symbol DEFINITIONS | Find function signatures, call sites |
Survey gives you the big picture. Code search gives you specific symbols. Findings gives you problems to fix.
Prerequisites
- Survey data: Run
aide survey runor usesurvey_runtool - Code index (for entrypoints + graph): Run
aide code index - Git history (for churn): Must be a git repository (uses go-git, no git binary needed)
Binary location: The aide binary is at .aide/bin/aide. If it's on your $PATH, you can use aide directly.
Notes
- Survey results are cached in BoltDB — re-run analyzers to refresh after significant changes
- Topology analyzer inspects the filesystem (build files, directory structure)
- Entrypoints analyzer uses the code index when available; falls back to file scanning
- Churn analyzer uses go-git to read git history directly (no git binary required)
- Call graph is computed on demand from the code index (not stored)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

