agentleFS
int2t05int2t05/engineering-skills/skills/09-operate/purity-audit/SKILL.md

purity-audit

Skill3 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub

Audit scoped artifacts for obsolete residue, duplication and factual gaps. Triggers on "purity audit", "纯净审计".

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Search obsolete references, repeated rules, editing prose and decoration.

    line 18
  2. Distinctive:

    Check action/verification correspondence and output ownership.

    line 20

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purity Audit

When to use

  • Audit scoped artifacts for obsolete residue, duplication and factual gaps.

Not for: documentation-audit for synchronization; code-review for defects.

Steps

  1. Agree target and load the checklist; preserve operational versions, valid pending work and legitimate audit evidence.
  2. Search obsolete references, repeated rules, editing prose and decoration; judge matches in context.
  3. Check action/verification correspondence and output ownership; delegate only when authorized and useful.
  4. Fix scoped residue and produce the approved report; rerun targeted checks and classify open findings.

Output: Suggested paths, subject to human audit: docs/audit/YYYY-MM-DD-purity.md at the approved path.

Verify

  • Findings have contextual evidence; necessary history, versions and unrelated content are preserved.

References

  • engineering-principles.md — shared decision boundaries, scope and verification.
  • human-audit.md — document consent, readability and human review.
  • purity-checklist.md — the 16-point A–E checklist (the audit criteria).
  • references/subagent-dispatch.md — per-category auditor dispatch: constructed-context template + worked Category-A example.
  • references/templates.md — audit-report template.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.