agentleFS
Sign inStart free
int2t05int2t05/engineering-skills/skills/03-design/prompt-engineering/SKILL.md

prompt-engineering

Skill3 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub

Design and evaluate prompts or LLM workflows on representative tasks. Triggers on "prompt engineering", "提示词工程".

85 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use security-checklist, llm-evaluation and 6 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • atuljha23Skill

    security-checklist

    OWASP-style quick reference — authn/authz, injection, secrets, sessions, crypto, dependencies. Use during code review and before committing security-sensitive changes.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • xfstudioSkill

    llm-evaluation

    Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    coding-principles

    Enforces engineering, architecture, public API, and code quality standards distilled from human reviewer feedback across A2UI pull requests. Use when authoring new code, refactoring, addressing review feedback, or reviewing PR diffs. Don't use for release publishing or spec blueprint generation without code or PR changes.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • mjunaidcaSkill

    tool-design

    Design tools that agents can use effectively. Use when creating new tools for agents, debugging tool-related failures, or optimizing existing tool sets.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • LangChainSkill

    web-research

    Use this skill for requests related to web research; it provides a structured approach to conducting comprehensive web research

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • LuisSambranoSkill

    firecrawl

    Deep web scraping, screenshots, PDF parsing, and website crawling using Firecrawl API

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 75 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run representative and adversarial cases.

    line 22

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 75 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Prompt Engineering

When to use

  • Design and evaluate prompts or LLM workflows on representative tasks.

Not for: skill-authoring for skills; research for model comparisons.

Steps

  1. Define inputs, expected outcomes, trust boundaries, failure costs and representative cases.
  2. Establish the existing baseline; add minimal instructions addressing observed gaps and verify current provider behavior.
  3. Specify output validation and actual tool permissions, budgets and termination; prompt text alone is not a security boundary.
  4. Run representative and adversarial cases; compare quality, latency and cost and report limitations.

Output: Suggested paths, subject to human audit: docs/design/PROMPT.md for a maintained workflow.

Verify

  • Revisions have a stated baseline and rubric; invalid output and untrusted input are handled and unrun cases are explicit.

References

  • engineering-principles.md — shared decision boundaries, scope and verification.
  • human-audit.md — document consent, readability and human review.
  • references/prompt-architecture.md — prompt component breakdown, few-shot patterns, structured-output techniques, model selection matrix, eval-harness setup, guardrail catalog

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free