agentleFS
int2t05int2t05/engineering-skills/skills/07-verify/linting/SKILL.md

linting

Skill3 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub

Fix machine-detectable issues using configured project tooling. Triggers on "lint", "lint 修复".

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read scripts, configuration and CI for actual commands.

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Run checks and classify defects, formatting and justified narrow suppression.

    line 18

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Linting

When to use

  • Fix machine-detectable issues using configured project tooling.

Not for: code-review for semantics; debugging for runtime failures.

Steps

  1. Read scripts, configuration and CI for actual commands.
  2. Run checks and classify defects, formatting and justified narrow suppression.
  3. Fix scoped batches without weakening rules or broadly hiding failures.
  4. Rerun changed checks and compare local and CI behavior; report unrelated pre-existing failures separately.

Verify

  • Configured checks ran; suppressions are narrow and justified and unrelated failures remain visible.

References

  • engineering-principles.md — shared decision boundaries, scope and verification.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.