video-delivery
Skill0 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Deliver the video: encodes per destination, verified transfers and the project hand-off. \"export it for YouTube\"
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Sanidhya14321/video-forgetheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- gehtalexey/claude-video-studiotheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- gehtalexey/claude-video-studio★ 2same name
- Sanidhya14321/video-forge★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- cutforgeSkill
- marketing-videoSkill
- media-archiveSkill
- render-and-assembleSkill
- revision-roundSkill
- sound-designSkill
- storyboard-and-lookSkill
- story-designSkill
- video-briefSkill
- video-qcSkill
- visuals-and-ai-artSkill
- voice-and-narrationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 32
Ask what the far side already has: before sending anything big.
- Distinctive: line 41
Never delete or overwrite on the client's drives: Write into a new dedicated subfolder.
- Very specific: line 57
Use references/screening-run-sheet.md.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Video delivery: the right file, verified on the far side, and a project anyone can continue
Delivery fails in boring ways: a 3.3 GB file on a FAT32 pen drive, a projector that cannot decode High@5.1, a transfer that dies at 80 %, a hand-off nobody else can rebuild. Plan for the slowest link and verify on the far side.
1. Encode per destination
python tools/deliver/encode.py <master.mp4> <preset> [out.mp4] (re-normalises loudness per preset):
| Preset | Use |
projector | 1080p H.264 High@4.1 ~10 Mbps, -16 LUFS; small home projectors and TVs (bring projector720 as backup) |
projector720 | 720p High@3.1 ~6 Mbps; weak players, old TVs |
youtube | 1080p 12 Mbps, closed GOP, -14 LUFS, faststart |
reels | 1080×1920 30 fps, -14 LUFS (source must already be vertical; captions inside the safe zone) |
whatsapp | 720p ~2.5 Mbps; send as a document to avoid recompression |
broadcast | 1080p 20 Mbps, -23 LUFS (EBU R128); US: --lufs -24 --tp -2 |
archive | the master's video copied, audio 320k |
Files over 4 GB do not fit FAT32: use exFAT/NTFS or play from a laptop (--fat32 warns). Platform specs and
caption rules: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/docs/compliance-and-licensing.md section 2; projector notes: section 5.
2. Move big files safely
- Ask what the far side already has before sending anything big. Real case: ten graded chapters (3.3 GB, 3.5
hours over the link) were cut losslessly out of the master already on the client's PC with
tools/deliver/recover_chapters.py(refon the source machine,cuton the far side), verified by decoded- frame md5; the mix went over as lossless FLAC (204 MB instead of 340 MB), sample-identical. - Split, send, join, verify:
parts.py split <file> --mib 15→ send the parts →parts.py join <manifest.json>on the far side (resumable: run again until COMPLETE; it never deletes, it truncates to the last verified part and appends) → whole-file md5 → decode check (verify.py --final). rcopy.pyfor resumable verified copies onto slow drives;xtar.pyto extract archives on drives where delete/overwrite is not allowed, under a time budget.- Never delete or overwrite on the client's drives. Write into a new dedicated subfolder; list leftovers (transfer parts) for the client to delete themselves.
3. Hand over the project, not only the film
The final hand-off is a folder anyone (or any agent) can continue with one-chapter re-renders:
- code (
src/,tools/,film/,render.mjs,package.json), assets used (public/), narration (sound/vo/), cue sheet, graded chapters (out/ch/*_f.mp4), the mix, and the master PROJECT.md,facts.md,decisions.md,sources.md,spend.md, allNOTES_vN.mdCLAUDE.md(pipeline commands and rules for any agent) +README.md(for a human) +config.jsonwith the new machine's paths (folders,api_keys_file,gl,concurrency,browser_executable)- excluded:
node_modules(npm install),models/(fetch_models.py), raw chunks, transfer parts, keys - on the far side:
npm install,python tools/setup_local.py, render one chapter's stills to prove it
4. The screening (personal films and events)
Use references/screening-run-sheet.md. In short: test on the exact device in the room days before; carry the
master, a 720p backup and a phone copy; play from a laptop if the projector's player is unreliable; external
speaker; 2 s of black at both ends; offline (no autoplay, no notifications); one person owns play/pause, the
interval and the lights.
5. Archive
Master + project folder + sources.md (licences) + spend.md on two drives or a drive and a cloud account. Note the md5 of the master in PROJECT.md.
References
references/screening-run-sheet.md: device test, run sheet, backups, what can go wrong in the room${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/docs/lessons-learned.mdsection H
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

