agentleFS
Sanidhya14321Sanidhya14321/video-forge/skills/video-delivery/SKILL.md

video-delivery

Skill2 starsChanged 25 days agoMITView on GitHub

Export social video variants, inspect playable media, review thumbnails and caption placement, and prepare publishing assets.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 2

    1. gehtalexey/claude-video-studio★ 2same name
    2. indranilbanerjee/cutforge★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read delivery workflows. Export from the editable composition to each requested aspect ratio.

    line 10
  2. Very specific:

    Run node <plugin-root>/dist/cli.js inspect /absolute/path/video.mp4.

    line 12

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Video Delivery

For version-2 TSX films, CLI preview produces moving drafts and run delivers the full source tree, critical native frames, media manifest, optional measured transcript/SRT and technical checks. Review complete moving playback and peak motion, not only stills. See code projects.

Read delivery workflows. Export from the editable composition to each requested aspect ratio. Use explicit dimensions for preview renders and full-resolution presets for delivery.

Run node <plugin-root>/dist/cli.js inspect /absolute/path/video.mp4. The runner also writes quality.json with codec, dimensions, duration, audio presence, caption count, and full-stream decoding results. These checks do not assess pacing, correctness, visual taste, pronunciation, or accessibility.

For reels, run CLI review and preview, then check key text and captions against the conservative content bounds. A platform interface can vary; these bounds are a design aid, not upload certification.

Inspect frames at scene changes and information-dense moments. Listen to narration and music together. Test captions on a phone-sized view, and inspect the vertical crop separately. The first export produces a thumbnail frame; it may need a separately designed cover.

Preserve MP4s, source job, composition, manifest, transcript, subtitles, and edit decisions. Finish the publishing draft with a factual hook, relevant asset credits, and generated-voice disclosure. Verify current destination upload limits before publication. This plugin prepares files and text; it does not publish or schedule posts.

For Instagram, YouTube Shorts and X, read platform direction. Recompose evidence, caption positions and cover crops per destination. Current account limits are separate from authored creative starting points; do not turn more cuts into a claim of algorithm optimization.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.