workflow-designer
Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Specify recurring operational, review, or content workflows with explicit triggers, inputs, actions, and ownership. Use when designing repeatable team routines, approval loops, release checklists, or automated processes — even if the user says \"design a workflow for this\". Do NOT use for one-off coding tasks.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Mandate Nothing Structural: Only add AI agents, schedules, or approval gates when the problem domain strictly requires them.
- Distinctive: line 44
Action: Run a focused grilling round exploring:
- Very specific: line 55
Action: Write the workflow contract to workflows/<name>.md detailing trigger, inputs, actions, checkpoint briefs, and outputs.
- Distinctive: line 56
Key Point: Ensure an implementer agent could implement scripts or automations from the document alone.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Workflow Designer
Design and formalize repeatable human-in-the-loop and autonomous workflows by identifying cyclical operational loops, pushing checkpoints right, and defining unambiguous execution contracts.
Core Invariants
- Push Checkpoints Right: Defer human checkpoints as far downstream as possible; maximize autonomous work before requesting review.
- Actionable Decision Briefs: Checkpoints must present a tight, decision-ready brief with clear diffs and links—never raw, uncurated outputs.
- Mandate Nothing Structural: Only add AI agents, schedules, or approval gates when the problem domain strictly requires them.
- Self-Contained Spec Completeness: A workflow specification is complete only when an implementer agent can build it without asking clarifying questions.
- Durable Notes Separation: Distinguish between immutable workflow specifications (
workflows/*.md) and evolving domain observations (NOTES.md).
Architecture & Map of Content (MOC)
[ Operational Habit / Team Routine ] ──► [ Loop Identification & Grilling ] ──► [ Workflow Formalization ] ──► [ Implementer Handoff ]| Component | Responsibility | Location |
| Workflow Specification | Executable contract (trigger, inputs, actions, checkpoints) | workflows/*.md |
| Domain & Tools Notes | Observed vocabulary, habits, tools, and channels | NOTES.md |
| Grilling Protocol | Socratic distillation of requirements and boundary edges | skills/grilling/SKILL.md |
Step-by-Step Procedure (TWI)
Step 1: Identify Cyclical Loops & Document Baseline Notes
- Action: Analyze the user's recurring tasks (daily, weekly, per-release) and record observed tools/channels into
NOTES.md. - Key Point: Map the natural lifecycle from trigger to final delivery.
- Why: Capturing the current baseline prevents designing theoretical workflows that mismatch daily reality.
Step 2: Conduct Socratic Grilling on Workflow Boundaries
- Action: Run a focused grilling round exploring:
- Trigger: Event-based (e.g. webhooks, new issue) vs. time-scheduled (e.g. cron).
- Inputs & State: Exactly what artifacts must be ingested.
- Actions: Discrete operational or agentic transformations.
- Checkpoints: Minimal review gates pushed to the end.
- Inline Checklist:
- Triggers clearly specified with fallback polling intervals
- Checkpoints provide decision-ready briefs
- Failure paths and escalation owners defined
Step 3: Author Executable Workflow Spec
- Action: Write the workflow contract to
workflows/<name>.mddetailing trigger, inputs, actions, checkpoint briefs, and outputs. - Key Point: Ensure an implementer agent could implement scripts or automations from the document alone.
- Why: Ambiguity in workflow contracts causes brittle automation failures.
Anti-Rationalization Guardrails
| Tempting Rationalization | Binding Rule | Engineering Rationale |
| "Ask the human to verify every intermediate step." | Push checkpoints right; batch human reviews. | Frequent interruptions cause human fatigue and destroy automation efficiency. |
| "Dump raw log files for the human checkpoint." | Produce synthesized, decision-ready briefs. | Humans review clean executive summaries 10x faster than raw debug logs. |
| "Assume an LLM agent is required for every workflow step." | Use deterministic scripts where possible; AI only where judgment is needed. | Deterministic scripts are faster, cheaper, and more reliable than LLMs for structured operations. |
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- nvictor/skills★ 1same name
- GustavoGutierrez/engineering-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ai-data-remediationSkill
- ai-engineeringSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- engineering-workflow-guideSkill
- git-safety-guardrailsSkill
- goalSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- implementSkill
- implement-specSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- j-spaceSkill
- migrate-to-shoehornSkill
- ml-best-practicesSkill
- prototypeSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- retroSkill
- scaffold-exercisesSkill
- setup-engineering-workflowsSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- setup-ts-deep-modulesSkill
- skill-conductorSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- wizardSkill
- writing-beatsSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- writing-fragmentsSkill
- writing-shapeSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

