agentleFS
imMamdouhaboammarimMamdouhaboammar/matts-skills-into-chatgpt/skills/wayfinder/SKILL.md

wayfinder

Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Map and navigate large, uncertain multi-session efforts through a shared graph of decision tickets. Use when facing complex greenfield projects or massive architectural migrations that exceed a single session — even if the user says \"map out this massive project\". Do NOT use for small, well-scoped features.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 178 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Fog-of-War Graduation: Never pre-slice blurry, distant work into speculative tickets.

    line 18
  2. Very specific:

    Key Point: If the route is already completely clear without fog, stop and route directly to to-spec.

    line 59
  3. Distinctive:

    Action: Create sharp child issues for immediate unblocked decisions and wire native blocking relationships.

    line 63
  4. Very specific:

    Key Point: Keep un-sharp future ideas in the ## Not yet specified section of the map.

    line 64
  5. Very specific:

    Action: Add a one-line summary to ## Decisions so far on the map issue and graduate freshly specifiable items from ## Not yet specified …

    line 77
  6. Very specific:

    Key Point: If a path is determined to be outside the destination scope, move it to ## Out of scope and close any associated tickets.

    line 78

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 178 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Wayfinder

Chart, navigate, and incrementally resolve large, uncertain multi-session architectural efforts through an evolving graph of decision tickets and clear frontier discovery.


Core Invariants

  1. Plan Over Do: Wayfinder tickets resolve decisions, investigate unknowns, or validate prototypes—not raw execution slices.
  2. Single Canonical Map Issue: Maintain a single root tracker issue labeled wayfinder:map as the low-resolution index linking all child decision tickets.
  3. One Decision Ticket Per Session: A single agent session claims and resolves at most ONE decision ticket (excepting parallel research subagents).
  4. Frontier Claim Protocol: A session must explicitly assign the decision ticket to itself before beginning work to prevent multi-agent collision.
  5. Fog-of-War Graduation: Never pre-slice blurry, distant work into speculative tickets; keep them in ## Not yet specified until the frontier reaches them.

Architecture & Map of Content (MOC)

[ Massive Uncertain Initiative ]
                │
                ▼
┌───────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Chart Destination & Map Issue      │ ──► Issue `wayfinder:map`
│    (Notes, Fog sketches, Boundaries)  │
└──────────────────┬────────────────────┘
                   │
                   ▼
┌───────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. Frontier Decision Tickets          │ ──► Child issues (`research`, `prototype`, `grilling`, `task`)
│    (Unblocked, unclaimed questions)   │
└──────────────────┬────────────────────┘
                   │
                   ▼
┌───────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. Atomic Session Resolution          │ ──► Post resolution comment, close issue,
│    (Claim 1 ticket, settle decision)  │     update `Decisions so far`, graduate fog
└───────────────────────────────────────┘
Ticket TypeExecution ModePurpose
ResearchAFK SubagentDocumentation, API discovery, external facts
PrototypeHITL InteractiveThrowaway exploratory code (skills/prototype/SKILL.md)
GrillingHITL InteractiveSocratic decision distillation (skills/grilling/SKILL.md)
TaskAFK or HITLManual prerequisite unblocking (e.g. account setup, credential provisioning)

Step-by-Step Procedure (TWI)

Step 1: Chart the Destination & Map Root

  • Action: Grill the user breadth-first to define the destination (the ultimate spec, architecture, or migration target) and establish the wayfinder:map root issue.
  • Key Point: If the route is already completely clear without fog, stop and route directly to to-spec.
  • Why: Wayfinding overhead is warranted only when substantial unknown decisions lie between the starting point and destination.

Step 2: Formulate Frontier Child Tickets & Wire Dependencies

  • Action: Create sharp child issues for immediate unblocked decisions and wire native blocking relationships.
  • Key Point: Keep un-sharp future ideas in the ## Not yet specified section of the map.
  • Inline Checklist:
    • Map created with clear Destination and Notes
    • Immediate decision questions ticketed and labeled
    • Blocking dependencies wired in tracker
    • Research tickets dispatched to background subagents

Step 3: Claim and Resolve a Single Frontier Ticket

  • Action: Assign the chosen frontier ticket to self, execute the investigation/grilling, and produce the decision verdict.
  • Key Point: Post the decision as a resolution comment on the issue and close it.
  • Why: Immediate closure and commentary keep the frontier clean and transparent for concurrent team members.

Step 4: Update Map Index & Graduate Fog

  • Action: Add a one-line summary to ## Decisions so far on the map issue and graduate freshly specifiable items from ## Not yet specified into new tickets.
  • Key Point: If a path is determined to be outside the destination scope, move it to ## Out of scope and close any associated tickets.
  • Why: Incremental fog clearing keeps the map accurate without speculative bloat.

Anti-Rationalization Guardrails

Tempting RationalizationBinding RuleEngineering Rationale
"I'll resolve 4 tickets in this single session."Enforce 1 decision ticket per session.Multi-ticket batching causes context exhaustion and sloppy decision records.
"Pre-create 20 tickets for all future phases."Keep blurry work in 'Not yet specified'.Pre-slicing the fog creates brittle tickets that get invalidated by early decisions.
"Start building the final feature code during wayfinding."Wayfinder produces decisions, not deliverables.Premature implementation while architecture is foggy leads to massive rewrites.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.