wayfinder
Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Map and navigate large, uncertain multi-session efforts through a shared graph of decision tickets. Use when facing complex greenfield projects or massive architectural migrations that exceed a single session — even if the user says \"map out this massive project\". Do NOT use for small, well-scoped features.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 178 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
Fog-of-War Graduation: Never pre-slice blurry, distant work into speculative tickets.
- Very specific: line 59
Key Point: If the route is already completely clear without fog, stop and route directly to to-spec.
- Distinctive: line 63
Action: Create sharp child issues for immediate unblocked decisions and wire native blocking relationships.
- Very specific: line 64
Key Point: Keep un-sharp future ideas in the ## Not yet specified section of the map.
- Very specific: line 77
Action: Add a one-line summary to ## Decisions so far on the map issue and graduate freshly specifiable items from ## Not yet specified …
- Very specific: line 78
Key Point: If a path is determined to be outside the destination scope, move it to ## Out of scope and close any associated tickets.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 178 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Wayfinder
Chart, navigate, and incrementally resolve large, uncertain multi-session architectural efforts through an evolving graph of decision tickets and clear frontier discovery.
Core Invariants
- Plan Over Do: Wayfinder tickets resolve decisions, investigate unknowns, or validate prototypes—not raw execution slices.
- Single Canonical Map Issue: Maintain a single root tracker issue labeled
wayfinder:mapas the low-resolution index linking all child decision tickets. - One Decision Ticket Per Session: A single agent session claims and resolves at most ONE decision ticket (excepting parallel research subagents).
- Frontier Claim Protocol: A session must explicitly assign the decision ticket to itself before beginning work to prevent multi-agent collision.
- Fog-of-War Graduation: Never pre-slice blurry, distant work into speculative tickets; keep them in
## Not yet specifieduntil the frontier reaches them.
Architecture & Map of Content (MOC)
[ Massive Uncertain Initiative ]
│
▼
┌───────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Chart Destination & Map Issue │ ──► Issue `wayfinder:map`
│ (Notes, Fog sketches, Boundaries) │
└──────────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌───────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. Frontier Decision Tickets │ ──► Child issues (`research`, `prototype`, `grilling`, `task`)
│ (Unblocked, unclaimed questions) │
└──────────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌───────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. Atomic Session Resolution │ ──► Post resolution comment, close issue,
│ (Claim 1 ticket, settle decision) │ update `Decisions so far`, graduate fog
└───────────────────────────────────────┘| Ticket Type | Execution Mode | Purpose |
| Research | AFK Subagent | Documentation, API discovery, external facts |
| Prototype | HITL Interactive | Throwaway exploratory code (skills/prototype/SKILL.md) |
| Grilling | HITL Interactive | Socratic decision distillation (skills/grilling/SKILL.md) |
| Task | AFK or HITL | Manual prerequisite unblocking (e.g. account setup, credential provisioning) |
Step-by-Step Procedure (TWI)
Step 1: Chart the Destination & Map Root
- Action: Grill the user breadth-first to define the destination (the ultimate spec, architecture, or migration target) and establish the
wayfinder:maproot issue. - Key Point: If the route is already completely clear without fog, stop and route directly to
to-spec. - Why: Wayfinding overhead is warranted only when substantial unknown decisions lie between the starting point and destination.
Step 2: Formulate Frontier Child Tickets & Wire Dependencies
- Action: Create sharp child issues for immediate unblocked decisions and wire native blocking relationships.
- Key Point: Keep un-sharp future ideas in the
## Not yet specifiedsection of the map. - Inline Checklist:
- Map created with clear Destination and Notes
- Immediate decision questions ticketed and labeled
- Blocking dependencies wired in tracker
- Research tickets dispatched to background subagents
Step 3: Claim and Resolve a Single Frontier Ticket
- Action: Assign the chosen frontier ticket to self, execute the investigation/grilling, and produce the decision verdict.
- Key Point: Post the decision as a resolution comment on the issue and close it.
- Why: Immediate closure and commentary keep the frontier clean and transparent for concurrent team members.
Step 4: Update Map Index & Graduate Fog
- Action: Add a one-line summary to
## Decisions so faron the map issue and graduate freshly specifiable items from## Not yet specifiedinto new tickets. - Key Point: If a path is determined to be outside the destination scope, move it to
## Out of scopeand close any associated tickets. - Why: Incremental fog clearing keeps the map accurate without speculative bloat.
Anti-Rationalization Guardrails
| Tempting Rationalization | Binding Rule | Engineering Rationale |
| "I'll resolve 4 tickets in this single session." | Enforce 1 decision ticket per session. | Multi-ticket batching causes context exhaustion and sloppy decision records. |
| "Pre-create 20 tickets for all future phases." | Keep blurry work in 'Not yet specified'. | Pre-slicing the fog creates brittle tickets that get invalidated by early decisions. |
| "Start building the final feature code during wayfinding." | Wayfinder produces decisions, not deliverables. | Premature implementation while architecture is foggy leads to massive rewrites. |
Other versions193 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 193
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1ksame name
- CelestoAI/SmolVM★ 1.1ksame name
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 665same name
183 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use loop-me and claude-handoff.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 46 projects that use this
ryotaroh180105Skillclaude-handoff
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Also in 37 projects that use this
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ai-data-remediationSkill
- ai-engineeringSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- engineering-workflow-guideSkill
- git-safety-guardrailsSkill
- goalSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- implementSkill
- implement-specSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- j-spaceSkill
- migrate-to-shoehornSkill
- ml-best-practicesSkill
- prototypeSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- retroSkill
- scaffold-exercisesSkill
- setup-engineering-workflowsSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- setup-ts-deep-modulesSkill
- skill-conductorSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- wizardSkill
- workflow-designerSkill
- writing-beatsSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- writing-fragmentsSkill
- writing-shapeSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

