engineering-workflow-guide
Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Route engineering, AI/ML, cognitive, or productivity tasks to the narrowest effective specialist skill. Use when a task spans planning, implementation, debugging, review, architecture, research, setup, AI modeling, data remediation, or autonomous goals, when the user asks what to do next, or when unsure which workflow fits — even if they don't explicitly name a skill. Do NOT use when the specific specialist skill is already obvious and unambiguous.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
No Unpackaged Ghost Skills: Every routed skill must exist verbatim in references/catalog.md and have an established SKILL.md.
- Distinctive: line 17
Fast-Path User Overrides: If the user explicitly requests a valid skill by name, honor it immediately without redundant routing …
- Very specific: line 18
Setup Pre-Requisite Check: If repository issue tracking, triage labels, or domain docs are unconfigured, run setup-engineering-workflows …
- Very specific: line 74
Action: Read references/catalog.md and classify the user's underlying intent, not just raw keywords.
- Very specific: line 75
Key Point: Check whether repository setup is complete (docs/agents/issue-tracker.md).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Engineering Workflow Guide
Centrally analyze tasks, classify developer intent, and route engineering workflows to the narrowest, highest-leverage specialist skill across the curated skill catalog.
Core Invariants
- Narrowest Effective Skill: Select the most specific skill that fully covers the task; avoid invoking broad, ceremonial meta-skills when a focused tool exists.
- One Primary Skill per Phase: Designate exactly one primary specialist skill for the current turn; chain secondary skills only across distinct lifecycle gates (e.g. Planning $\rightarrow$ Implementation $\rightarrow$ Review).
- No Unpackaged Ghost Skills: Every routed skill must exist verbatim in
references/catalog.mdand have an establishedSKILL.md. - Fast-Path User Overrides: If the user explicitly requests a valid skill by name, honor it immediately without redundant routing deliberation.
- Setup Pre-Requisite Check: If repository issue tracking, triage labels, or domain docs are unconfigured, run
setup-engineering-workflowsprior to planning or triage.
Architecture & Map of Content (MOC)
[ Developer Intent / Request ]
│
▼
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Intent Classification & Catalog Lookup │
│ (Match job against `references/catalog.md`) │
└──────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────────────┼──────────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
[ Discovery & Plan ] [ Code & Architecture ] [ AI, ML & Automation ]
- `grill-with-docs` - `implement` - `ai-engineering`
- `to-spec` - `code-review` - `ai-data-remediation`
- `to-tickets` - `diagnosing-bugs` - `ml-best-practices`
- `wayfinder` - `domain-modeling` - `j-space`
- `prototype` - `setup-ts-deep-modules` - `goal`
│
▼
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. Lifecycle Route Execution │
│ (State route briefly, invoke primary skill) │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘| Router Reference | Responsibility | File Location |
| Skill Catalog | Exhaustive index of all 42 packaged skills | references/catalog.md |
| ChatGPT Routing Contract | Runtime consumption & anti-hallucination protocol | references/chatgpt-routing-contract.md |
| Routing Matrix | 100+ intent patterns, triggers, and exclusions | references/routing-matrix.md |
| Phase Boundaries | Decision tree for /clear, /compact, /handoff, and subagents | PHASE-BOUNDARIES.md |
| Lifecycle Scenario | Canonical Route Pipeline |
| Fuzzy Greenfield Feature | grill-with-docs $\rightarrow$ to-spec $\rightarrow$ to-tickets $\rightarrow$ implement |
| Hard Bug or Regression | diagnosing-bugs $\rightarrow$ tdd |
| Pull Request Review | code-review (Two-axis: Standards & Spec) |
| Deep Module Restructuring | improve-codebase-architecture $\rightarrow$ setup-ts-deep-modules |
| Large Multi-Session Map | wayfinder $\rightarrow$ to-spec $\rightarrow$ to-tickets |
| Deep Multi-Step Reasoning | j-space (Cognitive registers & seam audits) |
| Autonomous Unattended Goal | goal (7-part prompt contract) |
| Production ML / LLM System | ai-engineering $\rightarrow$ ml-best-practices |
| Self-Healing Data Pipeline | ai-data-remediation |
| Long-Form Writing & Essays | writing-fragments $\rightarrow$ writing-shape / writing-beats |
Step-by-Step Procedure (TWI)
Step 1: Ingest Request and Consult Catalog
- Action: Read
references/catalog.mdand classify the user's underlying intent, not just raw keywords. - Key Point: Check whether repository setup is complete (
docs/agents/issue-tracker.md). - Why: Accurate intent classification ensures the agent doesn't jump into code when requirements are undefined.
Step 2: Formulate the Narrowest Route
- Action: Select the single primary specialist skill and state the multi-phase roadmap in 1–2 lines.
- Inline Checklist:
- Target skill verified in
references/catalog.md - Zero overlapping meta-skills invoked
- Distinct lifecycle phases separated cleanly
- Target skill verified in
Step 3: Execute Primary Phase
- Action: Invoke the selected skill instructions and proceed directly to execution.
- Why: Direct transition eliminates conversational overhead.
Anti-Rationalization Guardrails
| Tempting Rationalization | Binding Rule | Engineering Rationale |
| "Invoke 4 skills at once for a single simple change." | Enforce 1 primary skill per lifecycle phase. | Overlapping skill prompts create conflicting instructions and waste context budget. |
| "Invent a new custom workflow name not in catalog." | Route exclusively to packaged skills in catalog.md. | Routing to non-existent skills causes execution failures. |
| "Overrule the user's explicit skill invocation." | Honor user-requested skill unless hard conflict exists. | Respect developer intent and operational autonomy. |
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ai-data-remediationSkill
- ai-engineeringSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- git-safety-guardrailsSkill
- goalSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- implementSkill
- implement-specSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- j-spaceSkill
- migrate-to-shoehornSkill
- ml-best-practicesSkill
- prototypeSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- retroSkill
- scaffold-exercisesSkill
- setup-engineering-workflowsSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- setup-ts-deep-modulesSkill
- skill-conductorSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- wizardSkill
- workflow-designerSkill
- writing-beatsSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- writing-fragmentsSkill
- writing-shapeSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

