agentleFS
imMamdouhaboammarimMamdouhaboammar/matts-skills-into-chatgpt/skills/engineering-workflow-guide/SKILL.md

engineering-workflow-guide

Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Route engineering, AI/ML, cognitive, or productivity tasks to the narrowest effective specialist skill. Use when a task spans planning, implementation, debugging, review, architecture, research, setup, AI modeling, data remediation, or autonomous goals, when the user asks what to do next, or when unsure which workflow fits — even if they don't explicitly name a skill. Do NOT use when the specific specialist skill is already obvious and unambiguous.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    No Unpackaged Ghost Skills: Every routed skill must exist verbatim in references/catalog.md and have an established SKILL.md.

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Fast-Path User Overrides: If the user explicitly requests a valid skill by name, honor it immediately without redundant routing …

    line 17
  3. Very specific:

    Setup Pre-Requisite Check: If repository issue tracking, triage labels, or domain docs are unconfigured, run setup-engineering-workflows …

    line 18
  4. Very specific:

    Action: Read references/catalog.md and classify the user's underlying intent, not just raw keywords.

    line 74
  5. Very specific:

    Key Point: Check whether repository setup is complete (docs/agents/issue-tracker.md).

    line 75

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Engineering Workflow Guide

Centrally analyze tasks, classify developer intent, and route engineering workflows to the narrowest, highest-leverage specialist skill across the curated skill catalog.


Core Invariants

  1. Narrowest Effective Skill: Select the most specific skill that fully covers the task; avoid invoking broad, ceremonial meta-skills when a focused tool exists.
  2. One Primary Skill per Phase: Designate exactly one primary specialist skill for the current turn; chain secondary skills only across distinct lifecycle gates (e.g. Planning $\rightarrow$ Implementation $\rightarrow$ Review).
  3. No Unpackaged Ghost Skills: Every routed skill must exist verbatim in references/catalog.md and have an established SKILL.md.
  4. Fast-Path User Overrides: If the user explicitly requests a valid skill by name, honor it immediately without redundant routing deliberation.
  5. Setup Pre-Requisite Check: If repository issue tracking, triage labels, or domain docs are unconfigured, run setup-engineering-workflows prior to planning or triage.

Architecture & Map of Content (MOC)

[ Developer Intent / Request ]
                │
                ▼
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Intent Classification & Catalog Lookup               │
│    (Match job against `references/catalog.md`)          │
└──────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────┘
                           │
    ┌──────────────────────┼──────────────────────┐
    ▼                      ▼                      ▼
[ Discovery & Plan ]   [ Code & Architecture ]   [ AI, ML & Automation ]
- `grill-with-docs`    - `implement`             - `ai-engineering`
- `to-spec`            - `code-review`           - `ai-data-remediation`
- `to-tickets`         - `diagnosing-bugs`       - `ml-best-practices`
- `wayfinder`          - `domain-modeling`       - `j-space`
- `prototype`          - `setup-ts-deep-modules` - `goal`
                           │
                           ▼
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. Lifecycle Route Execution                           │
│    (State route briefly, invoke primary skill)         │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Router ReferenceResponsibilityFile Location
Skill CatalogExhaustive index of all 42 packaged skillsreferences/catalog.md
ChatGPT Routing ContractRuntime consumption & anti-hallucination protocolreferences/chatgpt-routing-contract.md
Routing Matrix100+ intent patterns, triggers, and exclusionsreferences/routing-matrix.md
Phase BoundariesDecision tree for /clear, /compact, /handoff, and subagentsPHASE-BOUNDARIES.md
Lifecycle ScenarioCanonical Route Pipeline
Fuzzy Greenfield Featuregrill-with-docs $\rightarrow$ to-spec $\rightarrow$ to-tickets $\rightarrow$ implement
Hard Bug or Regressiondiagnosing-bugs $\rightarrow$ tdd
Pull Request Reviewcode-review (Two-axis: Standards & Spec)
Deep Module Restructuringimprove-codebase-architecture $\rightarrow$ setup-ts-deep-modules
Large Multi-Session Mapwayfinder $\rightarrow$ to-spec $\rightarrow$ to-tickets
Deep Multi-Step Reasoningj-space (Cognitive registers & seam audits)
Autonomous Unattended Goalgoal (7-part prompt contract)
Production ML / LLM Systemai-engineering $\rightarrow$ ml-best-practices
Self-Healing Data Pipelineai-data-remediation
Long-Form Writing & Essayswriting-fragments $\rightarrow$ writing-shape / writing-beats

Step-by-Step Procedure (TWI)

Step 1: Ingest Request and Consult Catalog

  • Action: Read references/catalog.md and classify the user's underlying intent, not just raw keywords.
  • Key Point: Check whether repository setup is complete (docs/agents/issue-tracker.md).
  • Why: Accurate intent classification ensures the agent doesn't jump into code when requirements are undefined.

Step 2: Formulate the Narrowest Route

  • Action: Select the single primary specialist skill and state the multi-phase roadmap in 1–2 lines.
  • Inline Checklist:
    • Target skill verified in references/catalog.md
    • Zero overlapping meta-skills invoked
    • Distinct lifecycle phases separated cleanly

Step 3: Execute Primary Phase

  • Action: Invoke the selected skill instructions and proceed directly to execution.
  • Why: Direct transition eliminates conversational overhead.

Anti-Rationalization Guardrails

Tempting RationalizationBinding RuleEngineering Rationale
"Invoke 4 skills at once for a single simple change."Enforce 1 primary skill per lifecycle phase.Overlapping skill prompts create conflicting instructions and waste context budget.
"Invent a new custom workflow name not in catalog."Route exclusively to packaged skills in catalog.md.Routing to non-existent skills causes execution failures.
"Overrule the user's explicit skill invocation."Honor user-requested skill unless hard conflict exists.Respect developer intent and operational autonomy.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.