prd-writer
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill when user asks to create, write, or draft a PRD (Product Requirements Document). Generates structured PRDs with governance framework, problem statements, business goals, use cases, and functional requirements.
35 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- alunadev/ald-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- shawnclybor/clybor-claude-toolingtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Sach1ng/PM-operating-OStheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- WST2002/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- awahids/noskilltheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- sankar2code/Claude-Skill_SubAgent-Builder-Collectionstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use user-research.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkilluser-research
Plan, conduct, and synthesize user research. Trigger with "user research plan", "interview guide", "usability test", "survey design", "research questions", or when the user needs help with any aspect of understanding their users through research.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions35 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 35
- aakashg/pm-claude-code-setup★ 152same name
- cigery-useio/useio-skills★ 103same name
- skinnerlee1225/enterprise-prd-toolkit★ 45same name
- nimbalyst/skills★ 28same name
- vibepm666/prd-writer★ 27same name
- aroyburman-codes/pm-skills★ 25same name
- HiWhaleW/skill★ 22same name
- Panix22/prd-writer-skill★ 19same name
- samlaying/pm-skills★ 9same name
- v60samurai/builder-os★ 8same name
25 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- app-store-analyzerSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- competitor-trackerSkill
- continual-learningSkill
- decision-loggerSkill
- exec-communicatorSkill
- experiment-designerSkill
- experiment-writeupSkill
- growth-loop-mapperSkill
- jtbd-extractorSkill
- knowledge-updaterSkill
- launch-postSkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- meeting-to-actionsSkill
- metric-storytellerSkill
- one-pagerSkill
- pptx-creatorSkill
- prioritization-scorerSkill
- retro-runnerSkill
- stakeholder-updateSkill
- strategy-connectorSkill
- user-interview-synthSkill
- what-ifSkill
- working-backwardsSkill
- writing-clearlySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Create comprehensive Product Requirements Documents following a structured PRD template format.
- Distinctive: line 46
Use the problem statement framework:
- Distinctive: line 94
P0: Must have for launch
- Distinctive: line 138
Ask clarifying questions (one at a time):
- Distinctive: line 148
Create PRD in sections, validating each:
- Distinctive: line 152
Use cases and requirements
- Very specific: line 157
Google Doc: Use create_document and write_document tools
- Distinctive: line 158
Local Markdown: Write to project directory
- Distinctive: line 159
Both: Create local source of truth + shareable Google Doc
- Distinctive: line 163
Be specific: Avoid vague requirements; include measurable criteria
- Distinctive: line 165
Prioritize ruthlessly: Not everything is P0
- Distinctive: line 168
Keep it current: Update last modified date with each change
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PRD Writer
Create comprehensive Product Requirements Documents following a structured PRD template format. This skill ensures consistent, well-structured PRDs that align with product development standards.
When to Use
- User explicitly asks for a PRD
- User wants to document product requirements
- User needs to formalize a product idea into a structured document
- User mentions "product requirements", "PRD", or "spec"
PRD Structure
1. Header Section
🚧 Draft | ✅ Approved | 🔄 In Review
LAST UPDATED: [Date]
[PRD Title]
[One-line description of initiative for quick context]2. Governance Table (RACI)
| ROLE | NAMES | REVIEW STATUS |
| RESPONSIBLE (Drive decision process) | PM (Primary Owner): [Name], Design: [Name], Eng: [Name] | Not started |
| ACCOUNTABLE (Ultimate decision authority) | [Name] | Not started |
| CONSULTED (Contribute input) | [Names] | Not started |
| INFORMED | [Names] | Not started |
3. Background & Current State
- Current state experience with pain points
- Industry data and competitive landscape
- Link to recordings, Figma files, or other references
4. Problem Statements (Customer Problem Framework)
Use the problem statement framework:
Customer Problem:
I am… [narrow description of customer]
I am trying to… [desired outcome]
But… [problem or barrier]
Because… [root cause]
Which makes me feel… [emotion]Business Problem:
I am… [business unit/team]
I am trying to… [business goal]
But… [challenge]
Because… [root cause]
Which makes me feel… [impact]5. Ideal State
In a perfect world: [Vision of solved problem]
The biggest benefit to me is: [Primary value proposition]
Which makes me feel: [Emotional outcome]6. Business Goals and Success Metrics
| GOAL/METRIC | DESCRIPTION | TARGET |
| [Metric name] | [Brief description] | [Target value] |
7. Key Features
High-level explanation of feature areas (3-6 features):
- Feature 1: [Description]
- Feature 2: [Description]
- Feature 3: [Description]
8. Use Cases & Functional Requirements
| ID | PRIORITY | PERSONA | USE CASE | ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA |
| 1.1 | P0/P1/P2 | [Persona] | [As a user, I want...] | [Criteria for completion] |
Priority levels:
- P0: Must have for launch
- P1: Important, should have
- P2: Nice to have
9. Non-Functional Requirements
- Performance Requirements: Latency, throughput, scalability
- Security Requirements: Auth, encryption, compliance
- Legal Requirements: Disclaimers, regulatory compliance
- Internationalization: Language, locale support
- Reliability: Uptime SLA, failover
10. Insights and Problem Validation
- Market Research: SWOT analysis, competitive UI analysis
- Customer Insights: Research findings, survey data, customer feedback, app reviews
- Include supporting quotes when available
11. Milestones and Releases
| MILESTONE | TARGET DATE | DESCRIPTION |
| Alpha | [Date] | [Scope] |
| Beta | [Date] | [Scope] |
| GA | [Date] | [Scope] |
12. Open Questions and Decisions
| TYPE | DESCRIPTION | PERSON RESPONSIBLE | STATUS | DATE TO CLOSE |
| Question/Decision | [Description] | [Name] | Not started/Decided | [Date] |
13. Appendix
| RELATED ARTIFACTS | DESCRIPTION | LINKS |
| Related PRD | Connected workstream PRDs | [Link] |
| Figma | E2E journeys, wireframes, designs | [Link] |
| Research | Research plans and insights | [Link] |
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Information
Ask clarifying questions (one at a time):
- What is the product/feature being defined?
- Who is the target user/persona?
- What problem does it solve?
- What are the key success metrics?
- What are the main features?
- Any constraints or dependencies?
Step 2: Draft PRD
Create PRD in sections, validating each:
- Header and governance
- Problem statements
- Goals and features
- Use cases and requirements
- Milestones and appendix
Step 3: Output Options
- Google Doc: Use
create_documentandwrite_documenttools - Local Markdown: Write to project directory
- Both: Create local source of truth + shareable Google Doc
Best Practices
- Be specific: Avoid vague requirements; include measurable criteria
- Use personas: Reference specific user personas consistently
- Prioritize ruthlessly: Not everything is P0
- Include rationale: Explain "why" not just "what"
- Link evidence: Reference research, data, and prior art
- Keep it current: Update last modified date with each change
Agentic PRD Extensions
For AI-powered products, include additional sections:
- Agent Classification: Type, autonomy level, interaction mode
- AI Trust Profile: Data sensitivity, decision risk, reversibility
- AI Leverage Points: Where AI adds unique value
- Guardrails & Safety: Ethical bounds, fallbacks, human escalation
- Eval Framework: How to measure AI performance
See references/agentic-prd-template.md for the full agentic PRD template.
Reference Templates
| Template | Use Case |
references/prd-template.md | Standard PRD with governance, problem statements, requirements |
references/agentic-prd-template.md | Extended template for AI/agent products with evals, guardrails, trust |
Quick Reference
| Section | Purpose | Key Content |
| Governance | Who decides | Who decides, approves, reviews |
| Problem Statement | Why | Customer and business pain points |
| Ideal State | Vision | Perfect world outcome |
| Goals/Metrics | Success | Measurable targets |
| Use Cases | What | Functional requirements |
| NFRs | How | Performance, security, reliability |
| Milestones | When | Timeline and phases |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

