decision-logger
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Capture decision traces — the reasoning behind key PM decisions. Use after PRD approvals, scope changes, launch/kill calls, prioritization shifts, or any significant product decision.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- darkweb19/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Sach1ng/PM-operating-OStheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Hassaan146/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 25, 2026
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 8, 2026
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 4, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use andreessen, business-investment-advisor and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Hussain-ElfalahSkillandreessen
Also in 4 projects that use this
Hussain-ElfalahSkillbusiness-investment-advisor
Also in 4 projects that use this
csiddhant796-blipSkillkarpathy-coder
Use when writing, reviewing, or committing code to enforce Karpathy's 4 coding principles — surface assumptions before coding, keep it simple, make surgical changes, define verifiable goals. Triggers on "review my diff", "check complexity", "am I overcomplicating this", "karpathy check", "before I commit", or any code quality concern where the LLM might be overcoding.
Also in 4 projects that use this
csiddhant796-blipSkillself-eval
Honestly evaluate AI work quality using a two-axis scoring system. Use after completing a task, code review, or work session to get an unbiased assessment. Detects score inflation, forces devil's advocate reasoning, and persists scores across sessions.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +8 more from Hussain-Elfalah
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- Sach1ng/PM-operating-OS★ 3same name
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 2same name
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
- darkweb19/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- app-store-analyzerSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- competitor-trackerSkill
- continual-learningSkill
- exec-communicatorSkill
- experiment-designerSkill
- experiment-writeupSkill
- growth-loop-mapperSkill
- jtbd-extractorSkill
- knowledge-updaterSkill
- launch-postSkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- meeting-to-actionsSkill
- metric-storytellerSkill
- one-pagerSkill
- pptx-creatorSkill
- prd-writerSkill
- prioritization-scorerSkill
- retro-runnerSkill
- stakeholder-updateSkill
- strategy-connectorSkill
- user-interview-synthSkill
- what-ifSkill
- working-backwardsSkill
- writing-clearlySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
After a PRD is approved or rejected
- Distinctive: line 13
After a scope change or pivot
- Very specific: line 14
After a launch/kill/iterate decision on an experiment
- Distinctive: line 15
After a prioritization shift (quarterly planning, reprioritization)
- Distinctive: line 16
After a significant stakeholder alignment (exec review, cross-functional agreement)
- Distinctive: line 17
When asked "log this decision", "record why we decided this", or "decision trace"
- Distinctive: line 23
Ask if not obvious from context:
- Distinctive: line 32
Date: When the decision was made
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Decision Logger
Capture the reasoning behind key product decisions as structured, append-only traces. This builds the "event clock" — the record of why things became true, not just what is true now.
When to Use
- After a PRD is approved or rejected
- After a scope change or pivot
- After a launch/kill/iterate decision on an experiment
- After a prioritization shift (quarterly planning, reprioritization)
- After a significant stakeholder alignment (exec review, cross-functional agreement)
- When asked "log this decision", "record why we decided this", or "decision trace"
Process
1. Identify the Decision
Ask if not obvious from context:
- What was decided? (1 sentence)
- What triggered this decision? (signal, meeting, data, escalation)
2. Capture the Trace
Gather the following — from conversation context, user input, or by asking:
- Decision: What was decided (1 sentence)
- Date: When the decision was made
- Context: What prompted this — the signal, conversation, or data point
- Alternatives considered: What other options were on the table (at least 2)
- Evidence: What data, insight, or customer signal drove the call
- Stakeholders: Who was involved, who approved, who dissented
- Expected outcome: What we expect to happen as a result
- Risk / reversal cost: How hard is this to undo if wrong
- Tags: strategic-pillar, metric, segment, experiment (for retrieval)
3. Write the Entry
Save to memory/decisions/YYYY-MM-DD_short-slug.md using this format:
# [Decision title]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Type:** [PRD approval | Scope change | Launch/Kill | Prioritization | Alignment | Other]
**Tags:** [pillar, metric, segment]
## Decision
[1-2 sentences: what was decided]
## Context
[What prompted this — the trigger]
## Alternatives Considered
1. **[Option A]** — [brief description, why not chosen]
2. **[Option B]** — [brief description, why not chosen]
## Evidence
- [Data point, customer insight, or signal that drove the call]
## Stakeholders
- **Decision maker:** [who]
- **Consulted:** [who]
- **Informed:** [who]
## Expected Outcome
[What we expect to happen, and how we'll know]
## Risk / Reversal Cost
[How hard is this to undo — low/medium/high, and why]4. Confirm with User
Show the drafted entry. Ask the user to confirm or adjust before saving.
Output
A timestamped decision trace saved to memory/decisions/. Append-only — never overwrite existing entries.
Over time, these traces enable:
- Recall: "Why did we decide X?"
- Pattern detection: "We've killed 3 pricing experiments in a row"
- Drift detection: "Strategy says X but decisions are moving toward Y"
- Counterfactual reasoning: "What if we'd chosen the alternative?"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

