brainstorming
Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Structured ideation before committing to a design. Socratic questioning to surface hidden requirements and constraints. Produces 2-3 concrete approaches with explicit tradeoffs. Runs at the start of the PLAN workflow.
190 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ainurdev/mystical-assistanttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alunadev/ald-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
ryanportfolioSkilladdskill
Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.
Also in 6 projects that use this
ryanportfolioSkillapply-firmware
Bring current folder (plain folder, existing repo, old or partial firmware copy) up to full Harness Firmware in place. Mirror external repo → adopt-repo.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +6 more from ryanportfolio
Other versions190 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 190
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- JetBrains/thinkrail★ 7.9ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 4.9ksame name
- BetterTyped/react-zoom-pan-pinch★ 1.9ksame name
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8ksame name
180 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/coding/redis-agent-skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/coding/redis-agent-skills/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-browserSkill
- autopilotSkill
- book-studySkill
- browser-useSkill
- cavemanSkill
- androidSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- supabase-postgres-best-practicesSkill
- theme-factorySkill
- vercel-react-best-practicesSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
- context7-aware-codingSkill
- document-intakeSkill
- explore-codebaseSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- finishing-a-branchSkill
- ohc-coding-disciplineSkill
- pdfSkill
- ralphSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 170 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Run before writing-plans. Goal: surface the right approach before committing to it.
- Distinctive: line 16
Ask questions that reveal hidden requirements or constraints:
- Very specific: line 23
If the user uses project-specific terms, check .ohc/PROJECT.md first.
- Very specific: line 25
If they attach outside authoritative docs in non-OHC layouts, run document-intake so naming aligns with glossary rules in …
- Distinctive: line 29
Before brainstorming, internally score the user's initial request:
- Distinctive: line 35
Stop asking questions when the request reaches Clear (50-75%) or higher.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 170 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Brainstorming
Run before writing-plans. Goal: surface the right approach before committing to it.
Phase 1: Socratic Questioning (max 5 questions)
Ask questions that reveal hidden requirements or constraints:
- "What happens when [edge case]?"
- "What's the most important constraint — speed, reliability, or simplicity?"
- "What would make this solution a failure?"
- "Is there an existing pattern in the codebase we should follow?"
- "Who is the user and what do they actually need?"
If the user uses project-specific terms, check .ohc/PROJECT.md first. Also
read optional domain docs (CONTEXT.md / CONTEXT-MAP.md) when present.
If they attach outside authoritative docs in non-OHC layouts, run document-intake so naming aligns with glossary rules in skills/writing-plans/references/domain-docs.md. For greenfield framing, optionally use references/product-brief-template.md.
Sharpen overloaded terms before designing.
Clarity Scoring Rubric
Before brainstorming, internally score the user's initial request:
- Vague (0-25%) → Need 3+ clarifying questions.
- Unclear (25-50%) → Need 1-2 clarifying questions.
- Clear (50-75%) → Confirm understanding, proceed with 0-1 questions.
- Precise (75-100%) → Skip questions, go straight to Phase 2.
Stop asking questions when the request reaches Clear (50-75%) or higher. You must understand the problem well enough to design for it.
Phase 2: Idea Expansion
Generate 3 approaches. Go broad first — don't self-censor. Include at least one "boring but reliable" and one "creative but risky" approach.
## Approach A: [Name] — [simple/fast/scalable/etc]
Description: [2 sentences]
Pros: [2-3 bullets]
Cons: [2-3 bullets]
Best when: [conditions]
Estimate: Xh
## Approach B: [Name]
...
## Recommendation: [A/B/C]
[2-3 sentences explaining why this fits the current situation]Phase 3: Confirmation
Present to user. Get explicit confirmation before moving to writing-plans. "Does this match what you were thinking? Any constraints I'm missing?"
See references/brainstorm-formats.md for alternative formats. See references/domain-docs.md for glossary and ADR-aware brainstorming.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

