test-driven-development
Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
RED-GREEN-REFACTOR discipline. Write failing test first, minimum code to pass, then refactor. Enforces verifier check before claiming any task done. Triggers on keyword "tdd" or when BUILD workflow is active.
190 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- chrysogonus/power-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Agent-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 19 projects that use this
LLl0k0laDSkillusing-agent-skills
Use when starting a session or when you need to discover which skill applies to the current task. This is the meta-skill that governs how all other skills are discovered and invoked.
Also in 39 projects that use this
LLl0k0laDSkillgit-workflow-and-versioning
Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.
Also in 47 projects that use this
MrCipherSmithSkillconstraint-driven-development
Use when a project needs a persistent, measurable quality bar — starting a project without documented standards, 'set up constraints', or when coverage/perf/a11y thresholds get re-debated per-PR. Produces CONSTRAINTS.md with enforceable numbers, ratchets, and a guard against silent weakening. NOT for throwaway prototypes or a one-off CI setup.
Also in 15 projects that use this
- +3 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +3 more from LLl0k0laD
Other versions190 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 190
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- NousResearch/hermes-agent★ 262ksame name
- addyosmani/agent-skills★ 114ksame name
- cloudflare/computer★ 9.9ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 4.9ksame name
- mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator★ 3.2ksame name
- crbnos/carbon★ 2.8ksame name
180 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/coding/redis-agent-skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/coding/redis-agent-skills/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-browserSkill
- autopilotSkill
- book-studySkill
- brainstormingSkill
- browser-useSkill
- cavemanSkill
- androidSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- supabase-postgres-best-practicesSkill
- theme-factorySkill
- vercel-react-best-practicesSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
- context7-aware-codingSkill
- document-intakeSkill
- explore-codebaseSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- finishing-a-branchSkill
- ohc-coding-disciplineSkill
- pdfSkill
- ralphSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 178 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Before any implementation code:
- Distinctive: line 19
Write a test describing observable behavior through the public interface
- Distinctive: line 20
Run the test — confirm it FAILS
- Distinctive: line 27
Do not write implementation until the test fails correctly.
- Distinctive: line 28
Avoid implementation-detail tests: private methods, internal call counts, and mocked internal collaborators.
- Distinctive: line 33
Write the MINIMUM code needed to make the test pass.
- Distinctive: line 34
No optimization. No refactoring.
- Distinctive: line 37
Run the test. Read the output.
- Distinctive: line 38
If it doesn't pass: fix implementation, not the test (unless test was wrong).
- Distinctive: line 43
After each change: run the tests.
- Distinctive: line 46
Never move to the next task while tests are red.
- Distinctive: line 50
After RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for each task: → Hand to verifier agent with exact test command → Verifier runs both tests AND static quality …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 178 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test-Driven Development
The loop: RED → GREEN → REFACTOR. Never skip a phase. Work in vertical slices: one behavior test, the minimum implementation, then the next behavior. Do not write all tests first and all implementation later.
RED — Write a failing test first
Before any implementation code:
- Write a test describing observable behavior through the public interface
- Run the test — confirm it FAILS
- Confirm it fails for the RIGHT reason:
- ✓ "function doesn't exist yet"
- ✓ "function returns wrong value"
- ✗ "syntax error in test" → fix the test first
- ✗ "missing import in test" → fix the import first
Do not write implementation until the test fails correctly. Avoid implementation-detail tests: private methods, internal call counts, and mocked internal collaborators. Mock only system boundaries.
GREEN — Minimum code to pass
Write the MINIMUM code needed to make the test pass. No optimization. No refactoring. No extra features. The ugliest correct code beats the prettiest incorrect code.
Run the test. Read the output. If it doesn't pass: fix implementation, not the test (unless test was wrong).
REFACTOR — Clean up while staying green
Improve the code. Rename. Extract. Simplify. After each change: run the tests. If they fail: revert the change. Refactor ends when: code is clean AND tests still pass.
Never move to the next task while tests are red.
Verifier Handoff
After RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for each task: → Hand to verifier agent with exact test command → Verifier runs both tests AND static quality checks, reports pass/fail counts → Only proceed if: 0 failing tests, 0 skipped, 0 failing quality checks, success criterion met
# Tests
bash skills/test-driven-development/scripts/verify-tests-pass.sh
# Typecheck + lint (auto-detects TS, JS, Python, Go, Rust, Dart, Swift; skips missing tools)
bash skills/test-driven-development/scripts/verify-code-quality.shCommon Mistakes
Writing implementation first: Resist. The test comes first, always. Tests that always pass: A test that never fails is not a test. Confirm RED first. "I'll add tests later": Post-implementation tests test the implementation, not the requirement. Horizontal slicing: Writing many tests before any implementation creates brittle imagined tests. Skipping refactor: Technical debt is immediate. Refactor now while context is fresh.
See references/red-green-refactor.md for detailed examples. See references/test-patterns.md for patterns by language. See references/behavior-first-testing.md for vertical slices, mocking, and interface design.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

