bug-triage
Skill5 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when open game bugs need priority and severity review, sprint assignment, or systemic trend analysis.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
23 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 27 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
10
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Before default delegation, run python3 ../../../tools/codex_studio/agent_delegation.py resolve --project-root <project-root> --role <role> …
- Distinctive: line 13
Ask one decision question per turn and wait for the answer before asking another.
- Very specific: line 14
Use request_user_input for structured choices when it is available.
- Distinctive: line 15
Use Codex custom agents by role and profile when delegation is useful.
- Distinctive: line 16
Treat any approved write as one complete proposed changeset.
- Very specific: line 20
Before invoking or routing to $team-qa, confirm that team-qa is present in the current task's available skill catalog.
- Very specific: line 34
After $team-qa completes and new bugs have been filed
- Distinctive: line 35
When the bug count crosses 10+ open items
- Distinctive: line 46
No argument — run sprint mode if a current sprint exists, else full mode
- Distinctive: line 59
If no bug files found:
- Distinctive: line 64
Stop and report. Do not proceed if no bugs exist.
- Very specific: line 68
Read the most recently modified file in production/sprints/ to understand:
- Distinctive: line 73
If no sprint file exists: note "No sprint plan found — assigning to backlog only."
- Very specific: line 77
Read ../../../.codex/docs/coding-standards.md for severity/priority definitions if they exist.
- Distinctive: line 108
Check whether the current sprint has remaining capacity
- Very specific: line 109
If capacity exists: assign to sprint (Sprint: [current])
- Very specific: line 110
If capacity is full: flag as Priority overflow — consider pulling from sprint
- Distinctive: line 129
After classifying all bugs, generate trend metrics:
- Distinctive: line 235
Write only after approval.
- Very specific: line 238
If any S1 bugs are unassigned: "S1 bugs must be assigned before the sprint can be considered healthy.
- Very specific: line 240
If regression bugs exist: "Regressions found — consider re-opening the affected stories in sprint tracking and running $smoke-check to …
- Distinctive: line 242
If no P1 bugs exist: "No P1 bugs — build is in good shape for QA hand-off." Verdict: COMPLETE — triage report written.
- Distinctive: line 244
If user declined write: Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined write.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 27 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- codex-studio-delegation: governed -->Resolve every role through ../../../.codex/docs/plugin-agent-delegation.md;
do not require a repository-local .codex/agents/ or .codex/agent-packs/ tree.
Before default delegation, run python3 ../../../tools/codex_studio/agent_delegation.py resolve --project-root <project-root> --role <role> and use only its returned role contract.
Codex Interaction Contract
- Ask one decision question per turn and wait for the answer before asking another.
- Use
request_user_inputfor structured choices when it is available; otherwise ask the same concise question directly. - Use Codex custom agents by role and profile when delegation is useful.
- Treat any approved write as one complete proposed changeset. Do not add unlisted files or behavior; pause and request a new approval if scope expands.
Native readiness gate for $team-qa
Before invoking or routing to $team-qa, confirm that team-qa is present in the current task's available skill catalog. If unavailable, report
Staged dependency: $team-qa is not available, defer the handoff, do not invoke $team-qa, do not route to $team-qa, and do not search for or copy a repository-local skill file.
Bug Triage
This skill processes the open bug backlog into a prioritised, sprint-assigned action list. It distinguishes between severity (how bad is the impact?) and priority (how urgently must we fix it?), detects systemic trends, and ensures no critical bug is lost between sprints.
Output: production/qa/bug-triage-[date].md
When to run:
- Sprint start — assign open bugs to the new sprint or backlog
- After
$team-qacompletes and new bugs have been filed - When the bug count crosses 10+ open items
1. Parse Arguments
Modes:
$bug-triage sprint— triage against the current sprint; assign fixable bugs to the sprint backlog; defer the rest$bug-triage full— full triage of all bugs regardless of sprint scope$bug-triage trend— trend analysis only (no assignment); read-only report- No argument — run sprint mode if a current sprint exists, else full mode
2. Load Bug Backlog
Step 2a — Discover bug files
file search for bug reports in priority order:
production/qa/bugs/*.md— individual bug report files (preferred format)production/qa/bugs.md— single consolidated bug log (fallback)- Any
production/qa/qa-plan-*.md"Bugs Found" table (last resort)
If no bug files found:
"No bug files found in
production/qa/bugs/. If bugs are tracked in a different location, adjust the glob pattern. If no bugs exist yet, there is nothing to triage."
Stop and report. Do not proceed if no bugs exist.
Step 2b — Load sprint context
Read the most recently modified file in production/sprints/ to understand:
- Current sprint number / name
- Stories in scope (for assignment target)
- Sprint capacity constraints (if noted)
If no sprint file exists: note "No sprint plan found — assigning to backlog only."
Step 2c — Load severity reference
Read ../../../.codex/docs/coding-standards.md for severity/priority definitions if they
exist. If they do not exist, use the standard definitions in Step 3.
3. Classify Each Bug
For each bug, extract or infer:
Severity (impact of the bug)
| Severity | Definition |
| S1 — Critical | Game crashes, data loss, or complete feature failure. Cannot proceed past this point. |
| S2 — High | Major feature broken but game is still playable. Significant wrong behaviour. |
| S3 — Medium | Feature degraded but a workaround exists. Minor wrong behaviour. |
| S4 — Low | Visual glitch, cosmetic issue, typo. No gameplay impact. |
Priority (urgency of the fix)
| Priority | Definition |
| P1 — Fix this sprint | Blocks QA, blocks release, or is regression from last sprint |
| P2 — Fix soon | Should be resolved before the next major milestone |
| P3 — Backlog | Would be good to fix, but no active blocking impact |
| P4 — Won't fix / Deferred | Accepted risk or out of scope for current product scope |
Assignment
For each P1/P2 bug in sprint mode:
- Identify which story or epic the fix belongs to
- Check whether the current sprint has remaining capacity
- If capacity exists: assign to sprint (
Sprint: [current]) - If capacity is full: flag as
Priority overflow — consider pulling from sprint
For full mode: assign all P1 to current sprint, P2 to next sprint estimate,
P3+ to backlog.
Deviation check
Flag bugs that suggest systematic problems:
- 3+ bugs from the same system in the same sprint → "Potential design or implementation quality issue in [system]"
- 2+ S1/S2 bugs in the same story → "Story may need to be reopened and re-reviewed before shipping"
- Bug filed against a story marked Complete → "Regression in completed story — story should be re-opened in sprint tracking"
4. Trend Analysis
After classifying all bugs, generate trend metrics:
Volume trends
- Total open bugs: [N]
- Opened this sprint: [N]
- Closed this sprint: [N]
- Net change: [+N / -N]
System hot spots
- Which system has the most open bugs?
- Which system has the highest S1/S2 ratio?
Age analysis
- How many bugs are older than 2 sprints?
- Are any S1/S2 bugs un-assigned (sprint = none)?
Regression indicator
- Any bugs filed against previously-completed stories?
- Count: [N] regression bugs (story reopened implied)
5. Generate Triage Report
# Bug Triage Report
> **Date**: [date]
> **Mode**: [sprint | full | trend]
> **Generated by**: $bug-triage
> **Open bugs processed**: [N]
> **Sprint in scope**: [sprint name, or "N/A"]
---
## Triage Summary
| Priority | Count | Notes |
|----------|-------|-------|
| P1 — Fix this sprint | [N] | [N] assigned to sprint, [N] overflow |
| P2 — Fix soon | [N] | Scheduled for next sprint |
| P3 — Backlog | [N] | Deferred |
| P4 — Won't fix | [N] | Accepted risk |
**Critical (S1/S2) unfixed count**: [N]
---
## P1 Bugs — Fix This Sprint
| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Assigned to | Story |
|----|--------|----------|---------|-------------|-------|
| BUG-NNN | [system] | S[1-4] | [one-line description] | [sprint] | [story path] |
---
## P2 Bugs — Fix Soon
| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Target Sprint |
|----|--------|----------|---------|---------------|
| BUG-NNN | [system] | S[1-4] | [one-line description] | Sprint [N+1] |
---
## P3/P4 Bugs — Backlog / Won't Fix
| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Disposition |
|----|--------|----------|---------|-------------|
| BUG-NNN | [system] | S4 | [one-line description] | Backlog |
---
## Systemic Issues Flagged
[List any patterns from Step 3 deviation check, or "None identified."]
---
## Trend Analysis
**Volume**: [N] open / [+N] net change this sprint
**Hot spot**: [system with most bugs]
**Regressions**: [N] bugs against completed stories
**Aged bugs (>2 sprints old)**: [N]
[If N aged S1/S2 bugs > 0:]
> ⚠️ [N] high-severity bugs have been open for more than 2 sprints without
> assignment. These represent accepted risk that should be explicitly reviewed.
---
## Recommended Actions
1. [Most urgent action — usually "fix P1 bugs before QA hand-off"]
2. [Second action — usually "investigate [hot spot system] quality"]
3. [Third action — optional improvement]6. Write and Gate
Present the report in conversation, then ask:
"May I write this triage report to production/qa/bug-triage-[date].md?"
Write only after approval.
After writing:
- If any S1 bugs are unassigned: "S1 bugs must be assigned before the sprint
can be considered healthy. Run
$sprint-statusto see current capacity." - If regression bugs exist: "Regressions found — consider re-opening the
affected stories in sprint tracking and running
$smoke-checkto re-gate." - If no P1 bugs exist: "No P1 bugs — build is in good shape for QA hand-off." Verdict: COMPLETE — triage report written.
If user declined write: Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined write.
Collaborative Protocol
- Never close or mark bugs Won't Fix without user approval — surface them as P4 candidates and ask: "Are these acceptable as Won't Fix?"
- Never auto-assign to a sprint at capacity — flag overflow and let the sprint owner decide what to pull
- Severity is objective; priority is a team decision — present severity classifications as recommendations, not mandates
- Trend data is informational — do not block work on trend findings alone; surface them as observations
Other versions29 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 8
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27k76% same
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 9394% same
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 1795% same
- lilangMax/ClaudeCodeGameStudios★ 894% same
- dawn840705/claude-code-studios★ 194% same
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugin★ 194% same
- venus2099/codex-game-studios★ 176% same
- ShiningPlague/shiningplague-studio★ 088% same
Wrote their own version · 21
- symfony/symfony★ 31ksame name
- apify/apify-mcp-server★ 14ksame name
- OrchestratorInc/agent-orchestrator★ 14ksame name
- Untrivial-ai/agent-orchestrator★ 14ksame name
- ComposioHQ/agent-orchestrator★ 14ksame name
- AgentWrapper/agent-orchestrator★ 13ksame name
- phase-rs/phase★ 306same name
- jMerta/codex-skills★ 130same name
- MRCalderon3D/everything-game-dev-code★ 91same name
- cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use ao-desktop-dev and pr-description.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
agentlab-inSkillao-desktop-dev
Launch, restart, or troubleshoot the real AO Electron desktop app from this repository; run a checkout against isolated or real local AO data; combine PR branches for local UI review; and diagnose stale Electron processes, port conflicts, or preload bridge mismatches. Use whenever asked to run, open, show, or visually verify AO frontend changes in the actual desktop app rather than ao preview, dev:web, or mock data.
Also in 5 projects that use this
photon-groveSkillpr-description
Use when writing or revising a pull-request description. Produces concise, link-heavy, reviewer-scannable Markdown.
Also in 4 projects that use this
In this repository76 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Codex Studio Testing Framework/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- prototypes/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- tests/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adoptSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- art-bibleSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- asset-specSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- brainstormSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- content-auditSkill
- create-architectureSkill
- create-control-manifestSkill
- create-epicsSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- day-one-patchSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- estimateSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- helpSkill
- hotfixSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- playtest-reportSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- propagate-design-changeSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qa-planSkill
- quick-designSkill
- regression-suiteSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- review-all-gddsSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- security-auditSkill
- setup-engineSkill
- skill-improveSkill
- skill-testSkill
- smoke-checkSkill
- soak-testSkill
- sprint-planSkill
- sprint-statusSkill
- startSkill
- story-doneSkill
- story-readinessSkill
- team-audioSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

