agentleFS
holaroluwaholaroluwa/outbound-skills/skills/pain-identifier/SKILL.md

pain-identifier

Skill0 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub

Identify the top 5 buyer pains in the buyer's own language, ranked by urgency and frequency, pulled from won-deal call notes and records of prior outreach attempts. Use when the user wants "what actually hurts our buyer", "what pains should I lead with", "why do people buy this", or is about to write copy and needs the real pain to hook on. Writes the ranked pains into outreach-brief.md; these become the hooks for every cold email and call.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If evidence is thin, say so and draw on the personas in outreach-brief.md, but mark guessed pains as unverified.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep one verbatim line of buyer language per pain.

    line 20
  3. Very specific:

    Write into section 6 (Top pains) of outreach-brief.md: the top 5 pains, ranked, each with the buyer's own words and a note on urgency and …

    line 23

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Pain Identifier

People don't buy features, they buy their way out of pain. This skill finds the real pains in the words buyers actually use, and ranks them so you lead with the one that bites hardest.

Input needed

  • Won-deal call notes or transcripts, where the buyer described their problem.
  • Notes from prior outreach: what got replies and what got ignored.

If evidence is thin, say so and draw on the personas in outreach-brief.md, but mark guessed pains as unverified.

Method

  1. Pull every moment a buyer described a problem, a frustration, a workaround, or a cost. Capture their exact words.
  2. Cluster into distinct pains and merge duplicates.
  3. Rank by urgency (how much it hurts, how soon) and frequency (how often it comes up). The top of the list is what you hook on.
  4. Keep one verbatim line of buyer language per pain.

Output

Write into section 6 (Top pains) of outreach-brief.md: the top 5 pains, ranked, each with the buyer's own words and a note on urgency and frequency. Lead-gen copy should open on pain #1 unless you have a sharper signal.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.