agentleFS
hideki5123hideki5123/agent-skill-set/session-recap/SKILL.md

session-recap

Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Read a Claude Code session's transcript and produce two markdown artifacts plus a meta.json: a scannable Summary (TL;DR, key terms, files, decisions, open threads) and a complementary Detailed Note (full glossary, chronological flow, command-by-command annotations, pitfalls). The output language follows the watched session's dominant language (>= 50% Japanese characters → Japanese, otherwise English; overridable via --language). Standalone — pass a session ID, or omit to pick from recent sessions in the current directory. After generation, dispatches a configurable chain of follow-up skills (default ["recap-to-notion"]) read from ~/.claude/session-recaps/.recap-config.json. Owns the manifest schema and runs cleanup of confirmed-uploaded local recap dirs past retention. Read-only on the transcript itself. Use when the user says "session recap" / "セッションのまとめ" / "セッションサマリ" / "学びをまとめて" / "用語集を作って" / "summarize the session" / "recap session" / "session note" / "セッションのノート" / "/session-recap" / "セッション解説まとめ" / "recap掃除" / "recap cleanup" / "古いrecap削除".

  • Deletes or force-pushes
  • Commits and pushes

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

27 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 17 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 10

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 17

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.