adversarial-panel
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Run a multi-model adversarial mutual review with facilitator synthesis: 2+ panelists (different model families where possible — use codex-server / codex-cli for the external-family seat) independently answer, adversarially critique each other across rounds, and the main session acts as facilitator, synthesizing agreements, live disagreements, and calibrated confidence into one answer. Use ONLY on high-stakes, hard-to-reverse claims, designs or decisions, and only when the user EXPLICITLY asks to debate or adversarially review with multiple models — "discuss with Opus and Codex", "red-team this", "devil's advocate", 敵対的レビュー, 相互レビュー, 多モデル討論, 議論させて. A full run costs ~6 subagent/CLI dispatches: state the panel size and round count and get a go-ahead before launching. Where the Workflow tool is available, run the panel as a Workflow (judge-panel / adversarial-verify) instead of ad-hoc fan-out. Do NOT self-trigger on a bare "are you sure?" — that is a cue to OFFER the panel, not to run it.
- Reads credentials
In this repository58 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agents-initSkill
- agent-swarmSkill
- chrome-useSkill
- codex-cliSkill
- codex-serverSkill
- confluenceSkill
- deepenSkill
- dev-workflowSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- dotnet-seniorSkill
- e2e-testSkill
- en-to-ja-explainerSkill
- figma-shot-boardSkill
- gdrive-cliSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-to-implSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- japanese-tech-writingSkill
- jira-cliSkill
- local-skill-factorySkill
- logo-imageSkill
- my-gdriveSkill
- my-skill-factorySkill
- naturalize-jaSkill
- natural-japaneseSkill
- notion-cliSkill
- openai-cliSkill
- orch-qaSkill
- parallel-investigateSkill
- playwright-cliSkill
- pm-reviewSkill
- postmortemSkill
- prd-councilSkill
- prototypeSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- recap-to-notionSkill
- review-localSkill
- scenario-genSkill
- self-pr-reviewSkill
- session-handoverSkill
- session-recapSkill
- session-watchSkill
- skill-improveSkill
- slack-cliSkill
- slack-to-ticketSkill
- subagent-genSkill
- tddSkill
- test-scenarioSkill
- to-prdSkill
- triageSkill
- ui-spec-simSkill
- well-arch-costSkill
- well-arch-reliabilitySkill
- well-arch-securitySkill
- zoom-outSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.