testing-strategy
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Define the project's testing strategy. What test layers exist, what tools they use, how acceptance criteria map to tests, and how tests run through the delivery workflow. Use during design, alongside or after design-review.
54 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jDxve/avengers-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ccoalm/ccl-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- komluk/scaffoldingtheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- bmsuisse/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use api-contract-design, deploy-checklist and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MohOneXSkillapi-contract-design
Designs and reviews API contracts (REST, RPC, GraphQL, library interfaces) for evolvability, backward compatibility, and failure semantics. Use when defining new endpoints/interfaces, versioning an API, reviewing a schema, or deciding how breaking changes propagate to clients.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkilldeploy-checklist
Pre-deployment verification checklist. Use when about to ship a release, deploying a change with database migrations or feature flags, verifying CI status and approvals before going to production, or documenting rollback triggers ahead of time.
Also in 4 projects that use this
xenitV1Skillreact-patterns
Modern React patterns and principles. Hooks, composition, performance, TypeScript best practices.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AnthropicSkilltech-debt
Identify, categorize, and prioritize technical debt. Trigger with "tech debt", "technical debt audit", "what should we refactor", "code health", or when the user asks about code quality, refactoring priorities, or maintenance backlog.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillerror-handling
统一错误处理系统。在添加 API 端点、修改错误处理、添加前端 API 调用、编写错误相关测试时使用。
Also in 5 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillapi-design
Guide for designing and documenting RESTful APIs. Use when asked to design an API, create endpoints, or document an API.
Also in 9 projects that use this
- +4 more from anthropics
- +1 more from microsoft
Other versions54 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 54
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- chthollyphile/folia-major★ 12ksame name
- Community-Access/accessibility-agents★ 409same name
- AnastasiyaW/claude-code-config★ 214same name
- AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config★ 214same name
- irahardianto/awesome-agv★ 157same name
- Blushyes/reef★ 84same name
- shinpr/agentic-code★ 51same name
- addxai/enterprise-harness-engineering★ 44same name
- drafthq/draft★ 40same name
44 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- analysis-reviewSkill
- business-analysisSkill
- change-assessmentSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- feedbackSkill
- implementationSkill
- installSkill
- operationsSkill
- project-definitionSkill
- project-setupSkill
- project-startSkill
- release-planningSkill
- retirementSkill
- risk-managementSkill
- roadmapSkill
- test-adequacy-reviewSkill
- validationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 44 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill during Stage 3 design to make the verification model explicit before implementation begins.
- Distinctive: line 41
Not every project needs every layer.
- Distinctive: line 42
If a layer is omitted, say why that omission is acceptable.
- Distinctive: line 52
Document constraints and tradeoffs.
- Distinctive: line 56
Do not treat the verification model as settled until a human reviews it.
- Distinctive: line 74
Use the template in this skill directory when scaffolding or substantially reshaping the testing strategy.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 44 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Testing Strategy
Use this skill during Stage 3 design to make the verification model explicit before implementation begins.
Current Project Context
System Architecture
!cat docs/03-design/system-architecture.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No system architecture found."
Components
!cat docs/03-design/01-components.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No components artifact found."
Interfaces
!cat docs/03-design/02-interfaces.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No interfaces artifact found."
Technology Choices
!cat docs/03-design/03-technology-choices.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No technology choices artifact found."
Existing Testing Strategy
!cat docs/03-design/05-testing-strategy.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No existing testing strategy found - starting fresh."
Interaction Pattern
- Review the project architecture and its meaningful boundaries.
- Testing layers should reflect actual risk boundaries, not generic categories pasted in by habit.
- Define each test layer the project needs.
- For each layer, state its purpose, tool, when it runs, and what it does not cover.
- Justify what is included and excluded.
- Not every project needs every layer.
- If a layer is omitted, say why that omission is acceptable.
- Define where acceptance criteria live.
- Acceptance criteria do not live in the testing strategy.
- Feature docs own integration criteria.
- Story docs own component-level criteria.
- Define the test execution workflow.
- Describe the inner loop, pre-commit, pre-merge, CI, and any other important gates.
- Document constraints and tradeoffs.
- Real DB versus mocks, browser automation choices, cost/speed tradeoffs, and environment needs should be made explicit.
- Present the testing strategy for approval.
- Do not treat the verification model as settled until a human reviews it.
Common Layers Reference
These are guidance, not a mandatory checklist:
- Unit: single function or logic path, no I/O
- Contract: cross-module boundary agreement such as schemas, payloads, or formats
- Integration: real interfaces and infrastructure boundaries
- End-to-end / Smoke: user-facing workflow across the full stack
- Performance: latency, throughput, or resource-constraint verification
Outputs
Produce or update these artifacts as needed:
docs/03-design/05-testing-strategy.md
Use the template in this skill directory when scaffolding or substantially reshaping the testing strategy.
Gate
Human approval is required before treating the testing strategy as settled.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

