change-assessment
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Assess any code change request before implementation. Classifies scale (trivial/small/medium/large), applies a sniff test, and routes to the appropriate process depth. Use before accepting any implementation instruction.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xiejianjun000/FlowWikitheir own version, first seen Jul 27, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- xiejianjun000/FlowWiki★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- analysis-reviewSkill
- business-analysisSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- feedbackSkill
- implementationSkill
- installSkill
- operationsSkill
- project-definitionSkill
- project-setupSkill
- project-startSkill
- release-planningSkill
- retirementSkill
- risk-managementSkill
- roadmapSkill
- test-adequacy-reviewSkill
- testing-strategySkill
- validationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill before accepting implementation work.
- Distinctive: line 27
If concerns arise, surface them as an observation, not a hidden veto:
- Distinctive: line 30
If constraints force a shortcut, apply the Ideal Solution Pattern:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Change Assessment
Use this skill before accepting implementation work.
Interaction Pattern
- Classify the change scale:
- Trivial: typo, constant, rename -> implement directly
- Small: simple bug fix, field addition, bounded behavior tweak -> apply sniff test, then implement
- Medium: new feature, significant behavior change, new integration -> do a lightweight delta review of the existing analysis (or initial business analysis if none exists)
- Large: cross-cutting change, new subsystem, architectural shift -> do full business analysis before implementation, updating or re-baselining the product graph
- For small changes, apply the sniff test:
- What goal does this serve?
- Is this treating a symptom or a cause?
- Will this change make the next change harder or easier?
- If concerns arise, surface them as an observation, not a hidden veto:
- "You asked for X. Before I implement it, I notice [concern]. Would you like me to just make the change, or should we look at the broader picture first?"
- If constraints force a shortcut, apply the Ideal Solution Pattern:
- name the ideal solution
- record the expedient choice
- name the gap as intentional debt
- Route to the appropriate next step:
trivial-> implement directlysmall-> implement after sniff testmedium+ existing analysis present ->analysis-review(delta-focused review of the existing analysis)medium+ no existing analysis ->business-analysis(initial analysis)large->business-analysisto update or re-baseline the product graph, thendesign-review
Output
Produce a brief classification record containing:
- change scale
- rationale
- sniff test answers when applicable
- routing decision
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

