project-definition
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Stage 1 product definition for new initiatives. Clarify target users, intended value, major task categories, scope intent, and whether the initiative should proceed to analysis. Use for project types b through d.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rmstdope/cerebrotheir own version, first seen Oct 19, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- rmstdope/cerebro★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- analysis-reviewSkill
- business-analysisSkill
- change-assessmentSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- feedbackSkill
- implementationSkill
- installSkill
- operationsSkill
- project-setupSkill
- project-startSkill
- release-planningSkill
- retirementSkill
- risk-managementSkill
- roadmapSkill
- test-adequacy-reviewSkill
- testing-strategySkill
- validationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 13
Use this skill after project-setup when a new initiative needs a real Stage 1 product-definition pass before business analysis begins.
- Distinctive: line 36
Keep the emphasis upstream of requirements and design.
- Distinctive: line 40
Do not collapse this into implementation detail or requirement language yet.
- Distinctive: line 49
Use the result to frame Adopt / Configure / Extend / Build thinking without forcing premature commitment.
- Distinctive: line 56
If the gap is weak or the rationale is not yet credible, say so.
- Distinctive: line 57
If proceeding is justified, make that recommendation explicit.
- Distinctive: line 59
Create the roadmap once the strategic goal is settled.
- Distinctive: line 64
Every project gets one; length scales with the project, the sections do not.
- Distinctive: line 67
Do not treat product definition as settled until a human reviews it.
- Distinctive: line 68
Do not move into Stage 2 analysis until the Stage 1 artifacts are approved enough.
- Distinctive: line 78
Use the templates in this skill directory when scaffolding or substantially reshaping those artifacts.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Product Definition
Use this skill after project-setup when a new initiative needs a real Stage 1
product-definition pass before business analysis begins.
Compatibility note: this skill is still named project-definition so existing
routes and installed runtimes keep working. The Stage 1 concept is Product
Definition.
Current Project Context
Existing Product Definition Summary
!cat docs/01-project-definition/project-definition-summary.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No existing product definition summary found — starting fresh."
Existing Project Thesis And Principles
!cat docs/01-project-definition/project-thesis-and-principles.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No existing product thesis and principles found — starting fresh."
Interaction Pattern
- Identify the target user or audience.
- Clarify who the initiative is for and what context they are operating in.
- Distinguish primary users from secondary stakeholders when that matters.
- Clarify intended value.
- State what improvement the initiative is trying to create.
- Keep the emphasis upstream of requirements and design.
- Define the major task categories in scope.
- Describe the main categories of work the system should support first.
- Do not collapse this into implementation detail or requirement language yet.
- Clarify initial scope intent for the current phase.
- Make the current slice explicit.
- Name meaningful deferred areas so ambition does not silently expand.
- Survey existing tools or solutions.
- Identify what already exists.
- For each meaningful candidate, ask whether it fits as-is, partially fits, or is insufficient.
- Use the result to frame Adopt / Configure / Extend / Build thinking without forcing premature commitment.
- Capture thesis and guiding principles.
- State the core belief behind the initiative.
- Record product, experience, governance, and evaluation principles that should shape later analysis and design.
- Decide whether the initiative should proceed to analysis.
- If the gap is weak or the rationale is not yet credible, say so.
- If proceeding is justified, make that recommendation explicit.
- Create the roadmap once the strategic goal is settled.
- Stage 1 is the first moment a strategic goal and intended value exist, which is what a roadmap needs and why it is not scaffolded earlier.
- Invoke the
roadmapskill. It writesdocs/ROADMAP.mdwith the goal and a release table reading not yet planned — an honest state, not neglect. - Every project gets one; length scales with the project, the sections do not.
- Present the Stage 1 artifacts for approval.
- Do not treat product definition as settled until a human reviews it.
- Do not move into Stage 2 analysis until the Stage 1 artifacts are approved enough.
Outputs
Produce or update these artifacts as needed:
docs/01-project-definition/project-definition-summary.mddocs/01-project-definition/project-thesis-and-principles.mddocs/ROADMAP.md(via theroadmapskill)
Use the templates in this skill directory when scaffolding or substantially reshaping those artifacts.
Gate
Human approval is required before business analysis begins.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

