polish
Skill14 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.
70 other projects use a version of this, 27 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Mrbaeksang/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Integralist/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- tenequm/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- galiprandi/job-seekertheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- inkatze/planwrighttheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- angusfretwell/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use tokens, redesign and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
PeterCangSkilltokens
Count all historical Claude Code token usage across all local projects, broken down by model, project, date, and week. Includes cost estimation based on official Anthropic pricing.
Also in 3 projects that use this
arjunkshahSkillredesign
Redesign existing interfaces to premium quality while preserving product goals and functional behavior.
Also in 3 projects that use this
leonaaardobSkillmotion
Complete Motion.dev documentation - modern animation library for React, JavaScript, and Vue (formerly Framer Motion)
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillreview-loop
Iterative review loop using any lens agent against any target (plan, code, design). Use when you want to run a focused review cycle: spawn a fresh reviewer subagent with a specific lens, present findings and remediation to the user, apply fixes with user guidance, and repeat until clean.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 7 projects that use this
SentrySkillspec
Produce a verified spec — problem, desired outcome, and acceptance criteria — before building. Use when given a GitHub/Linear issue link, when starting from a fuzzy in-conversation idea, or asked to "figure out what to do" / "scope this" / "what should I build" — whenever the *what* isn't yet pinned down. Grills the ambiguities, checks the premise against the code, and produces acceptance criteria you sign off on — then hands to design-first.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions70 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 8
- 10xChengTu/Mux0★ 337100% same
- theexperiencecompany/gaia★ 325100% same
- owshq-mec/semana-ai-data-engineer★ 122100% same
- StyleSwift/StyleSwift★ 61100% same
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6100% same
- tyfarrago-hub/taste★ 3100% same
- ReScienceLab/TrySkills★ 2100% same
- vijaysuperpositionist/skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 27
- talesofai/cohub★ 58597% same
- nexmoe/DayBee★ 42495% same
- nexmoe/eve★ 42495% same
- Southclaws/storyden★ 34895% same
- AkaraChen/aghub★ 27197% same
- zacharyfmarion/openscad-studio★ 23894% same
- jagrat7/linux-wallpaper-engine★ 22798% same
- rwliebs/Dossier★ 8895% same
- heyhank-app/heyhank★ 3494% same
- wpgaurav/WordPress-skills★ 1990% same
17 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 35
- educlopez/ui-craft★ 441same name
- MJbae/awesome-novel-studio★ 148same name
- galiprandi/job-seeker★ 120same name
- tenequm/skills★ 39same name
- travsteward/openwriter★ 36same name
- Integralist/agent-skills★ 23same name
- mthines/agent-skills★ 20same name
- udaysharmadev/Skills★ 12same name
- EternallLight/tgc-skills★ 11same name
- sukirman1901/frontend-expert★ 9same name
25 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adaptSkill
- animateSkill
- auditSkill
- bolderSkill
- brainstormSkill
- build-fixSkill
- business-panelSkill
- checkpointSkill
- clarifySkill
- colorizeSkill
- composition-patternsSkill
- confidence-checkSkill
- config-doctorSkill
- critiqueSkill
- delightSkill
- design-auditSkill
- devils-advocateSkill
- distillSkill
- eval-harnessSkill
- feature-plannerSkill
- fix-prSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- gap-analysisSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- hardenSkill
- impeccableSkill
- layoutSkill
- learnSkill
- optimizeSkill
- overdriveSkill
- pytest-runnerSkill
- python-best-practicesSkill
- quieterSkill
- react-best-practicesSkill
- sc-helpSkill
- security-auditSkill
- shapeSkill
- tddSkill
- typesetSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- uv-packageSkill
- verifySkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
37 rules. 0 are common, 35 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 54 edited versions we read keep these.
35
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Before polishing, understand the system you are polishing toward:
- Distinctive: line 21
Find the design system: Search for design system documentation, component libraries, style guides, or token definitions.
- Distinctive: line 25
If a design system exists, polish should align the feature with it.
- Distinctive: line 35
When does it ship? (How much time for polish?)
- Distinctive: line 54
Consistent spacing: All gaps use spacing scale (no random 13px gaps)
- Distinctive: line 61
Check spacing with browser inspector
- Distinctive: line 62
Test at multiple viewport sizes
- Distinctive: line 63
Look for elements that "feel" off
- Distinctive: line 70
Widows & orphans: No single words on last line
- Distinctive: line 73
Font loading: No FOUT/FOIT flashes
- Distinctive: line 77
Contrast ratios: All text meets WCAG standards
- Distinctive: line 78
Consistent token usage: No hard-coded colors, all use design tokens
- Distinctive: line 82
Tinted neutrals: No pure gray or pure black—add subtle color tint (0.01 chroma)
- Distinctive: line 83
Gray on color: Never put gray text on colored backgrounds—use a shade of that color or transparency
- Distinctive: line 87
Every interactive element needs all states:
- Distinctive: line 102
Smooth transitions: All state changes animated appropriately (150-300ms)
- Very specific: line 103
Consistent easing: Use ease-out-quart/quint/expo for natural deceleration.
- Distinctive: line 112
Grammar & spelling: No typos
- Distinctive: line 113
Appropriate length: Not too wordy, not too terse
- Distinctive: line 118
Consistent style: All icons from same family or matching style
- Distinctive: line 121
Alt text: All images have descriptive alt text
- Distinctive: line 127
Label consistency: All inputs properly labeled
- Distinctive: line 136
Loading states: All async actions have loading feedback
- Distinctive: line 146
All breakpoints: Test mobile, tablet, desktop
- Distinctive: line 148
Readable text: No text smaller than 14px on mobile
- Distinctive: line 156
Smooth interactions: No lag or jank
- Distinctive: line 162
Remove console logs: No debug logging in production
- Very specific: line 166
Type safety: No TypeScript any or ignored errors
- Distinctive: line 202
Create new one-off components when design system equivalents exist
- Distinctive: line 207
Before marking as done:
- Distinctive: line 210
Test on real devices: Not just browser DevTools
- Distinctive: line 213
Check all states: Don't just test happy path
- Distinctive: line 217
After polishing, ensure code quality:
- Distinctive: line 219
Replace custom implementations: If the design system provides a component you reimplemented, switch to the shared version.
- Distinctive: line 220
Remove orphaned code: Delete unused styles, components, or files made obsolete by polish.
- Distinctive: line 221
Consolidate tokens: If you introduced new values, check whether they should be tokens.
- Distinctive: line 222
Verify DRYness: Look for duplication introduced during polishing and consolidate.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 54 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
MANDATORY PREPARATION
Invoke /impeccable — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /impeccable teach first. Additionally gather: quality bar (MVP vs flagship).
Perform a meticulous final pass to catch all the small details that separate good work from great work. The difference between shipped and polished.
Design System Discovery
Before polishing, understand the system you are polishing toward:
- Find the design system: Search for design system documentation, component libraries, style guides, or token definitions. Study the core patterns: color tokens, spacing scale, typography styles, component API.
- Note the conventions: How are shared components imported? What spacing scale is used? Which colors come from tokens vs hard-coded values? What motion and interaction patterns are established?
- Identify drift: Where does the target feature deviate from the system? Hard-coded values that should be tokens, custom components that duplicate shared ones, spacing that doesn't match the scale.
If a design system exists, polish should align the feature with it. If none exists, polish against the conventions visible in the codebase.
Pre-Polish Assessment
Understand the current state and goals:
- Review completeness:
- Is it functionally complete?
- Are there known issues to preserve (mark with TODOs)?
- What's the quality bar? (MVP vs flagship feature?)
- When does it ship? (How much time for polish?)
- Identify polish areas:
- Visual inconsistencies
- Spacing and alignment issues
- Interaction state gaps
- Copy inconsistencies
- Edge cases and error states
- Loading and transition smoothness
CRITICAL: Polish is the last step, not the first. Don't polish work that's not functionally complete.
Polish Systematically
Work through these dimensions methodically:
Visual Alignment & Spacing
- Pixel-perfect alignment: Everything lines up to grid
- Consistent spacing: All gaps use spacing scale (no random 13px gaps)
- Optical alignment: Adjust for visual weight (icons may need offset for optical centering)
- Responsive consistency: Spacing and alignment work at all breakpoints
- Grid adherence: Elements snap to baseline grid
Check:
- Enable grid overlay and verify alignment
- Check spacing with browser inspector
- Test at multiple viewport sizes
- Look for elements that "feel" off
Typography Refinement
- Hierarchy consistency: Same elements use same sizes/weights throughout
- Line length: 45-75 characters for body text
- Line height: Appropriate for font size and context
- Widows & orphans: No single words on last line
- Hyphenation: Appropriate for language and column width
- Kerning: Adjust letter spacing where needed (especially headlines)
- Font loading: No FOUT/FOIT flashes
Color & Contrast
- Contrast ratios: All text meets WCAG standards
- Consistent token usage: No hard-coded colors, all use design tokens
- Theme consistency: Works in all theme variants
- Color meaning: Same colors mean same things throughout
- Accessible focus: Focus indicators visible with sufficient contrast
- Tinted neutrals: No pure gray or pure black—add subtle color tint (0.01 chroma)
- Gray on color: Never put gray text on colored backgrounds—use a shade of that color or transparency
Interaction States
Every interactive element needs all states:
- Default: Resting state
- Hover: Subtle feedback (color, scale, shadow)
- Focus: Keyboard focus indicator (never remove without replacement)
- Active: Click/tap feedback
- Disabled: Clearly non-interactive
- Loading: Async action feedback
- Error: Validation or error state
- Success: Successful completion
Missing states create confusion and broken experiences.
Micro-interactions & Transitions
- Smooth transitions: All state changes animated appropriately (150-300ms)
- Consistent easing: Use ease-out-quart/quint/expo for natural deceleration. Never bounce or elastic—they feel dated.
- No jank: 60fps animations, only animate transform and opacity
- Appropriate motion: Motion serves purpose, not decoration
- Reduced motion: Respects
prefers-reduced-motion
Content & Copy
- Consistent terminology: Same things called same names throughout
- Consistent capitalization: Title Case vs Sentence case applied consistently
- Grammar & spelling: No typos
- Appropriate length: Not too wordy, not too terse
- Punctuation consistency: Periods on sentences, not on labels (unless all labels have them)
Icons & Images
- Consistent style: All icons from same family or matching style
- Appropriate sizing: Icons sized consistently for context
- Proper alignment: Icons align with adjacent text optically
- Alt text: All images have descriptive alt text
- Loading states: Images don't cause layout shift, proper aspect ratios
- Retina support: 2x assets for high-DPI screens
Forms & Inputs
- Label consistency: All inputs properly labeled
- Required indicators: Clear and consistent
- Error messages: Helpful and consistent
- Tab order: Logical keyboard navigation
- Auto-focus: Appropriate (don't overuse)
- Validation timing: Consistent (on blur vs on submit)
Edge Cases & Error States
- Loading states: All async actions have loading feedback
- Empty states: Helpful empty states, not just blank space
- Error states: Clear error messages with recovery paths
- Success states: Confirmation of successful actions
- Long content: Handles very long names, descriptions, etc.
- No content: Handles missing data gracefully
- Offline: Appropriate offline handling (if applicable)
Responsiveness
- All breakpoints: Test mobile, tablet, desktop
- Touch targets: 44x44px minimum on touch devices
- Readable text: No text smaller than 14px on mobile
- No horizontal scroll: Content fits viewport
- Appropriate reflow: Content adapts logically
Performance
- Fast initial load: Optimize critical path
- No layout shift: Elements don't jump after load (CLS)
- Smooth interactions: No lag or jank
- Optimized images: Appropriate formats and sizes
- Lazy loading: Off-screen content loads lazily
Code Quality
- Remove console logs: No debug logging in production
- Remove commented code: Clean up dead code
- Remove unused imports: Clean up unused dependencies
- Consistent naming: Variables and functions follow conventions
- Type safety: No TypeScript
anyor ignored errors - Accessibility: Proper ARIA labels and semantic HTML
Polish Checklist
Go through systematically:
- Visual alignment perfect at all breakpoints
- Spacing uses design tokens consistently
- Typography hierarchy consistent
- All interactive states implemented
- All transitions smooth (60fps)
- Copy is consistent and polished
- Icons are consistent and properly sized
- All forms properly labeled and validated
- Error states are helpful
- Loading states are clear
- Empty states are welcoming
- Touch targets are 44x44px minimum
- Contrast ratios meet WCAG AA
- Keyboard navigation works
- Focus indicators visible
- No console errors or warnings
- No layout shift on load
- Works in all supported browsers
- Respects reduced motion preference
- Code is clean (no TODOs, console.logs, commented code)
IMPORTANT: Polish is about details. Zoom in. Squint at it. Use it yourself. The little things add up.
NEVER:
- Polish before it's functionally complete
- Spend hours on polish if it ships in 30 minutes (triage)
- Introduce bugs while polishing (test thoroughly)
- Ignore systematic issues (if spacing is off everywhere, fix the system)
- Perfect one thing while leaving others rough (consistent quality level)
- Create new one-off components when design system equivalents exist
- Hard-code values that should use design tokens
Final Verification
Before marking as done:
- Use it yourself: Actually interact with the feature
- Test on real devices: Not just browser DevTools
- Ask someone else to review: Fresh eyes catch things
- Compare to design: Match intended design
- Check all states: Don't just test happy path
Clean Up
After polishing, ensure code quality:
- Replace custom implementations: If the design system provides a component you reimplemented, switch to the shared version.
- Remove orphaned code: Delete unused styles, components, or files made obsolete by polish.
- Consolidate tokens: If you introduced new values, check whether they should be tokens.
- Verify DRYness: Look for duplication introduced during polishing and consolidate.
Remember: You have impeccable attention to detail and exquisite taste. Polish until it feels effortless, looks intentional, and works flawlessly. Sweat the details - they matter.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

