agentleFS
excattexcatt/superclaude-plusplus/skills/shape/SKILL.md

shape

Skill14 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Plan the UX and UI for a feature before writing code. Runs a structured discovery interview, then produces a design brief that guides implementation. Use during the planning phase to establish design direction, constraints, and strategy before any code is written.

36 other projects use a version of this, 9 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use explore, build and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • genomewalkerSkill

    explore

    RLM-style recursive memory exploration - dynamically navigate the memory graph

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    build

    Build the TypeSpec Rust emitter from source. Run this after cloning the repo, after pulling changes, or when TypeScript source files have been modified.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    brief

    Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • jaydubya818Skill

    why

    Use when design rationale must be recovered from source history and available records.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    research

    Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    spec

    Produce a verified spec — problem, desired outcome, and acceptance criteria — before building. Use when given a GitHub/Linear issue link, when starting from a fuzzy in-conversation idea, or asked to "figure out what to do" / "scope this" / "what should I build" — whenever the *what* isn't yet pinned down. Grills the ambiguities, checks the premise against the code, and produces acceptance criteria you sign off on — then hands to design-first.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 31 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask these questions in conversation, adapting based on answers.

    line 29
  2. Distinctive:

    After the interview, synthesize everything into a structured design brief.

    line 61
  3. Distinctive:

    STOP and call the AskUserQuestion tool to clarify.

    line 94

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 31 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

MANDATORY PREPARATION

Invoke /impeccable, which contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding. If no design context exists yet, you MUST run /impeccable teach first.


Shape the UX and UI for a feature before any code is written. This skill produces a design brief: a structured artifact that guides implementation through discovery, not guesswork.

Scope: Design planning only. This skill does NOT write code. It produces the thinking that makes code good.

Output: A design brief that can be handed off to /impeccable craft, /impeccable, or any other implementation skill.

Philosophy

Most AI-generated UIs fail not because of bad code, but because of skipped thinking. They jump to "here's a card grid" without asking "what is the user trying to accomplish?" This skill inverts that: understand deeply first, so implementation is precise.

Phase 1: Discovery Interview

Do NOT write any code or make any design decisions during this phase. Your only job is to understand the feature deeply enough to make excellent design decisions later.

Ask these questions in conversation, adapting based on answers. Don't dump them all at once; have a natural dialogue. STOP and call the AskUserQuestion tool to clarify.

Purpose & Context

  • What is this feature for? What problem does it solve?
  • Who specifically will use it? (Not "users"; be specific: role, context, frequency)
  • What does success look like? How will you know this feature is working?
  • What's the user's state of mind when they reach this feature? (Rushed? Exploring? Anxious? Focused?)

Content & Data

  • What content or data does this feature display or collect?
  • What are the realistic ranges? (Minimum, typical, maximum, e.g., 0 items, 5 items, 500 items)
  • What are the edge cases? (Empty state, error state, first-time use, power user)
  • Is any content dynamic? What changes and how often?

Design Goals

  • What's the single most important thing a user should do or understand here?
  • What should this feel like? (Fast/efficient? Calm/trustworthy? Fun/playful? Premium/refined?)
  • Are there existing patterns in the product this should be consistent with?
  • Are there specific examples (inside or outside the product) that capture what you're going for?

Constraints

  • Are there technical constraints? (Framework, performance budget, browser support)
  • Are there content constraints? (Localization, dynamic text length, user-generated content)
  • Mobile/responsive requirements?
  • Accessibility requirements beyond WCAG AA?

Anti-Goals

  • What should this NOT be? What would be a wrong direction?
  • What's the biggest risk of getting this wrong?

Phase 2: Design Brief

After the interview, synthesize everything into a structured design brief. Present it to the user for confirmation before considering this skill complete.

Brief Structure

1. Feature Summary (2-3 sentences) What this is, who it's for, what it needs to accomplish.

2. Primary User Action The single most important thing a user should do or understand here.

3. Design Direction How this should feel. What aesthetic approach fits. Reference the project's design context from .impeccable.md and explain how this feature should express it.

4. Layout Strategy High-level spatial approach: what gets emphasis, what's secondary, how information flows. Describe the visual hierarchy and rhythm, not specific CSS.

5. Key States List every state the feature needs: default, empty, loading, error, success, edge cases. For each, note what the user needs to see and feel.

6. Interaction Model How users interact with this feature. What happens on click, hover, scroll? What feedback do they get? What's the flow from entry to completion?

7. Content Requirements What copy, labels, empty state messages, error messages, and microcopy are needed. Note any dynamic content and its realistic ranges.

8. Recommended References Based on the brief, list which impeccable reference files would be most valuable during implementation (e.g., spatial-design.md for complex layouts, motion-design.md for animated features, interaction-design.md for form-heavy features).

9. Open Questions Anything unresolved that the implementer should resolve during build.


STOP and call the AskUserQuestion tool to clarify. Get explicit confirmation of the brief before finishing. If the user disagrees with any part, revisit the relevant discovery questions.

Once confirmed, the brief is complete. The user can now hand it to /impeccable, or use it to guide any other implementation approach. (If the user wants the full discovery-then-build flow in one step, they should use /impeccable craft instead, which runs this skill internally.)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.