agentleFS
excattexcatt/superclaude-plusplus/skills/pytest-runner/SKILL.md

pytest-runner

Skill14 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Execute and analyze pytest-based tests. Includes coverage reports, failure analysis, and fixture debugging.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Auto-invoke: when test execution is requested

    line 14

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Pytest Runner Skill

Purpose

Execute and analyze tests for Python projects.

When to Use

  • Auto-invoke when test execution is requested
  • Triggered by keywords: "run tests", "pytest", "test"
  • Local test verification before CI/CD

Execution Modes

1. Quick Test

pytest -x -q
# Stop at first failure, minimal output

2. Full Test with Coverage

pytest --cov=src --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=html
# Full test suite + coverage report

3. Specific Test

pytest tests/test_api.py::test_create_user -v
# Run specific test only

4. Failed Only

pytest --lf
# Re-run only last failed tests

Output Format

All Pass

🧪 PYTEST RESULTS
=================

✅ All tests passed!

📊 Summary:
   Tests: 47 passed
   Time: 3.2s
   Coverage: 87%

📈 Coverage by Module:
   src/api.py        92%
   src/models.py     95%
   src/utils.py      78%  ⚠️
   src/db.py         85%

With Failures

🧪 PYTEST RESULTS
=================

❌ 3 tests failed

📊 Summary:
   Tests: 44 passed, 3 failed
   Time: 4.1s

🔴 Failures:

1. test_api.py::test_create_user_invalid_email
   ├─ Expected: ValidationError
   └─ Got: None

   💡 Fix: Check email validation logic
   📍 Location: src/api.py:45

2. test_db.py::test_connection_timeout
   ├─ Expected: TimeoutError after 5s
   └─ Got: Hung indefinitely

   💡 Fix: Verify DB connection timeout setting

3. test_utils.py::test_parse_date
   ├─ Expected: datetime(2024, 1, 15)
   └─ Got: ValueError

   💡 Fix: Check date format parsing logic

Coverage Analysis

Minimum Thresholds

coverage:
  minimum: 80%      # Overall minimum
  critical_paths:
    - src/api.py: 90%
    - src/auth.py: 95%
    - src/models.py: 85%

Uncovered Lines Report

📋 Uncovered Code:

src/utils.py (78% covered):
   Lines 45-52: Error handling branch
   Lines 78-85: Edge case for empty input

   💡 Tests needed:
   - test_parse_with_empty_input()
   - test_parse_with_invalid_format()

Fixture Analysis

Fixture Dependencies

📦 Fixture Graph:

db_session
  └─→ test_user
      └─→ authenticated_client
          └─→ admin_client

⚠️  Warning: Deep fixture chain (4 levels)
    → Verify test isolation

Slow Fixtures

⏱️  Slow Fixtures:

| Fixture | Avg Time | Usage |
|---------|----------|-------|
| db_session | 0.8s | 32 tests |
| redis_client | 0.5s | 12 tests |
| mock_api | 0.3s | 8 tests |

💡 Optimization: Consider changing db_session to module scope

Integration

# Pre-commit hook
pytest --co -q && pytest -x

# CI pipeline
pytest --cov --cov-fail-under=80 --junitxml=report.xml

# Watch mode (with pytest-watch)
ptw -- --lf

Commands

CommandDescription
/pytestRun all tests
/pytest --quickQuick test (-x -q)
/pytest --covInclude coverage
/pytest --failedRe-run failed only
/pytest [path]Run specific path

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.