lead-qualify
Skill21 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Score a lead or opportunity against an ideal-customer-profile fit check. Trigger when the user pastes a lead/company and asks "is this a fit", "should I pursue", or to qualify/score a lead against the ICP.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- runxhq/runxtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- localoy-ai/localstacktheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
- kronus-tech/kronustheir own version, first seen Mar 30, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- runxhq/runx★ 97same name
- kronus-tech/kronus★ 4same name
- localoy-ai/localstack★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- account-healthSkill
- calendar-followupSkill
- churn-saveSkill
- cold-outreachSkill
- content-repurposeSkill
- event-to-pipelineSkill
- example-skillSkill
- expansion-signalSkill
- follow-upSkill
- inbox-digestSkill
- marketing-feedbackSkill
- meeting-prepSkill
- onboarding-handoffSkill
- product-signalSkill
- qbr-prepSkill
- retention-feedbackSkill
- status-updateSkill
- support-signalSkill
- triageSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Do they have the problem you solve, today (not someday)?
- Distinctive: line 13
Do you have a way in — a warm path or a real signal?
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Lead Qualify (ICP check)
Score a lead against fit, not hype. Default criteria — edit them to your own ICP in ops/icp.md if you keep one:
- Do they have the problem you solve, today (not someday)?
- Can they buy — budget, and someone with authority?
- Is there a reason to act now?
- Do you have a way in — a warm path or a real signal?
Output: a 0–4 fit count, the single biggest gap, and a call: pursue / nurture / pass. A clear "pass" is worth more than a hopeful "maybe". Read ops/icp.md first if it exists; don't invent facts about the company you weren't given.
Depth
- quick: pursue / nurture / pass + one reason.
- standard: the full scoring above.
- deep: + the disqualifiers, and what would have to change to requalify.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.