agentleFS
etrebelsetrebels/claude-code-growth-os/CLAUDE.md

claude-code-growth-os

CLAUDE.md21 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

The working conventions, repository layout, rituals, hooks, rules and scheduling are in AGENTS.md, imported above, so every coding agent reads the same file. What follows is the part that only applies to Claude Code. This repo has accumulated open, unmerged PRs from prior sessions (7 open as of 2026-07-05; #38 has since merged, but the count has since drifted back up to 6 as of 2026-08-09, several dating to early July). Before opening a new PR: check repo:etrebels/claude-code-growth-os is:pr is:open…

The file

We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Add MCP servers (calendar, notes, issue tracker, CRM) by copying .mcp.json.example → .mcp.json (gitignored), then let your commands and …

    line 21

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
CLAUDE.md

@AGENTS.md

Claude Code Growth OS — Claude Code notes

The working conventions, repository layout, rituals, hooks, rules and scheduling are in AGENTS.md, imported above, so every coding agent reads the same file. What follows is the part that only applies to Claude Code.

Open-PR hygiene

This repo has accumulated open, unmerged PRs from prior sessions (7 open as of 2026-07-05; #38 has since merged, but the count has since drifted back up to 6 as of 2026-08-09, several dating to early July). Before opening a new PR: check repo:etrebels/claude-code-growth-os is:pr is:open for existing work on the same topic and continue or merge it rather than adding a near-duplicate. If a recurring skill's own prior PR is still open, that's a signal worth surfacing in its output, not a fresh PR to pile on top.

The rule keeps getting proven on insights-loop itself. #38 sat unmerged for four weeks before merging; its successor, #53 (opened 2026-07-19, "codify /babysit-prs, fix hygiene drift" — itself a fix for this exact problem), sat as a draft for three weeks and has since drifted into a real merge conflict with main (mergeable_state: dirty) as unrelated content landed on top of it. A routine that opens a fresh dated branch every week without checking back on last week's branch is how PRs pile up, not just a bystander reporting it — the fix is to extend or close out the prior branch before starting a new one, not just to log the number.

Session-analysis routines (e.g. insights-loop)

A remote/cloud session starts from a fresh clone every run — nothing under ~/.claude/projects/ (session transcripts) persists across sessions. "Analyze the last N days of Claude Code session transcripts" therefore has no literal data to read beyond the current run's own in-progress transcript. Any routine making that claim should fall back to evidence that does persist — git log --since, open/merged PR history and their review comments, and CI check runs — and say plainly that it's using that fallback rather than implying it read transcripts that don't exist in this environment.

Extending with tools

Add MCP servers (calendar, notes, issue tracker, CRM) by copying .mcp.json.example → .mcp.json (gitignored), then let your commands and skills reach them. Keep machine-local config and secrets in .claude/settings.local.json — copy the committed .claude/settings.local.example.json to start. Both real files are gitignored; never commit them.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.