lead-qualify
Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Score and qualify an inbound lead based on budget, timeline, technical fit, and engagement signals. Auto-invoked when user says "qualify this lead", "score this lead", "is this worth pursuing".
Files
Analyze the following lead and score it right now:
Lead info: $ARGUMENTS
Score on these 5 criteria (1-10 each):
| Criteria | Weight | Score | Reasoning |
| Technical fit (AI/RAG/full-stack match) | 30% | ? | |
| Budget (realistic for scope) | 25% | ? | |
| Client quality (communication, clarity, hire history) | 20% | ? | |
| Timeline (feasible delivery) | 15% | ? | |
| Growth potential (repeat work, referrals, portfolio) | 10% | ? |
Overall: weighted average
Verdict:
- Hot (8+): Apply immediately
- Warm (6-7.9): Worth pursuing
- Cold (below 6): Skip or low-effort
Then provide:
- Recommended response approach
- Key questions to ask the client
- Red flags (if any)
- Estimated effort to complete the work
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- runxhq/runx★ 97same name
- etrebels/claude-code-growth-os★ 21same name
- shakhruz/mila-core★ 3same name
- localoy-ai/localstack★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- global/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- auditSkill
- case-studySkill
- ci-commentSkill
- cold-outreachSkill
- daily-briefingSkill
- dep-checkSkill
- github-readmeSkill
- hub-statusSkill
- invoice-genSkill
- kronus-helpSkill
- kronusSkill
- kronus-troubleshootSkill
- linkedin-postSkill
- manifest-validateSkill
- meeting-notesSkill
- planSkill
- profile-optimizeSkill
- project-summarySkill
- quick-reviewSkill
- reviewSkill
- secret-scanSkill
- seo-articleSkill
- standup-updateSkill
- telegram-projectSkill
- test-genSkill
- test-runSkill
- testSkill
- upwork-proposalSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.