agentleFS
etretr/groundwork/skills/ship/SKILL.md

ship

Skill45 starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub

Ship a validated change to production - sequences observability and a staged rollout, then gates the outward-facing deploy behind a final go/no-go. Usage /groundwork:ship

194 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ios-sync, open-gstack-browser and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-sync

    Regenerate the iOS debug bridge against the latest upstream gstack templates. (gstack)

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    open-gstack-browser

    Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • ayudaySkill

    setup-deploy

    Configure deployment settings for /land-and-deploy. Detects your deploy platform (Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, GitHub Actions, custom), production URL, health check endpoints, and deploy status commands. Writes the configuration to CLAUDE.md so all future deploys are automatic. Use when: "setup deploy", "configure deployment", "set up land-and-deploy", "how do I deploy with gstack", "add deploy config".

    Also in 19 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    landing-report

    Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • zebbernSkill

    debug-fix

    Find and fix a bug or issue — from any source (GitHub issue, error message, user report, or observed behavior)

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • ramybarsoumSkill

    document-release

    Post-ship documentation update. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, cleans up TODOS, and optionally bumps VERSION. Use when asked to "update the docs", "sync documentation", or "post-ship docs". Proactively suggest after a PR is merged or code is shipped.

    Also in 23 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 180 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check for evidence (a green validation run, an approved PR).

    line 28
  2. Very specific:

    Before any outward-facing deploy step (flipping the canary flag on, promoting a stage, releasing), stop and ask the user with …

    line 43

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 180 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Ship

Orchestrator for the ship phase — the last leg of the lifecycle, after the change is built, validated, and reviewed. It sequences the ship disciplines and stops at a human go/no-go before anything reaches users.

<!-- Design note: this is a USER-ONLY LEAF (disable-model-invocation: true). It must be started deliberately by the user — the router and other skills cannot auto-fire it. That flag only blocks OTHER skills from calling THIS skill; it does NOT stop this skill from calling dual skills. So Step 2 dispatches instrument-observability / staged-rollout (both dual) via the Skill tool without issue. -->

Step 1: Confirm Validation and Review Passed

Shipping presupposes a clean change. Confirm both gates already cleared:

  • Validation passed — see [[validate]].
  • Review passed — see [[review-pr]].

Check for evidence (a green validation run, an approved PR). If you cannot confirm either, stop and ask the user to run [[validate]] / [[review-pr]] first. Do not re-run them here; this skill assumes they are done.

Step 2: Sequence the Ship Disciplines

Dispatch the two disciplines in order via the Skill tool. Each is dual-tier, so this leaf may call them. Do not parallelize — the rollout depends on the instrumentation.

(Architecture decisions are recorded earlier, during design-architecture — there is no decision-capture step here.)

  1. Skill(skill="groundwork:instrument-observability") — make the change observable (structured logs, RED metrics, trace spans, symptom alerts). Run before rollout: the rollout's monitoring window watches these signals.
  2. Skill(skill="groundwork:staged-rollout") — produce the pre-launch checklist, feature-flag gating, the staged/canary ramp, and the written rollback plan.

Carry each skill's verification result forward. If any reports its Verification incomplete, surface that to the user at Step 3 rather than silently proceeding.

Step 3: Final Go / No-Go Gate

Before any outward-facing deploy step (flipping the canary flag on, promoting a stage, releasing), stop and ask the user with AskUserQuestion:

{
  "questions": [{
    "question": "Validation and review passed. Observability instrumented, staged rollout plan and rollback ready. Proceed to begin the rollout?",
    "header": "Go / No-Go",
    "options": [
      { "label": "Go", "description": "Begin the staged rollout starting at the canary stage" },
      { "label": "No-Go", "description": "Stop — something needs attention first" }
    ],
    "multiSelect": false
  }]
}
  • No-Go → stop. Report what's outstanding; do not deploy.
  • Go → proceed to begin the staged rollout (the canary stage) per the plan from Step 2. Never skip this gate, even if every prior step is green — a human owns the decision to expose the change to users.

Verification

  • Validation and review were confirmed passed before any ship step ran
  • instrument-observability then staged-rollout were dispatched in that order
  • Each dispatched skill's Verification result was carried forward and any gaps surfaced
  • The go/no-go AskUserQuestion gate ran before any outward-facing deploy step
  • On No-Go, nothing was deployed; on Go, the rollout began at the canary stage

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.