using-groundwork
Skill45 starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub
This skill should be used when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- HarryJhin/groundworktheir own version, first seen Aug 4, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- HarryJhin/groundwork★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository43 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- build-unplannedSkill
- check-specs-alignmentSkill
- create-tasksSkill
- debugSkill
- design-architectureSkill
- design-it-twiceSkill
- design-productSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- finalize-taskSkill
- groundwork-checkSkill
- groundwork-helpSkill
- handoffSkill
- implement-taskSkill
- instrument-observabilitySkill
- just-do-itSkill
- just-do-it-swarmingSkill
- plan-taskSkill
- review-prSkill
- select-projectSkill
- setup-repoSkill
- shipSkill
- skillsSkill
- source-architecture-from-codeSkill
- source-product-specs-from-codeSkill
- source-ux-design-from-codeSkill
- split-architectureSkill
- split-specsSkill
- staged-rolloutSkill
- statuslineSkill
- swarm-debugSkill
- swarm-design-architectureSkill
- task-validation-loopSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- understanding-feature-requestsSkill
- use-git-worktreeSkill
- ux-designSkill
- validateSkill
- vertical-sliceSkill
- work-on-next-taskSkill
- work-onSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.
- Distinctive: line 10
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE.
- Very specific: line 17
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly.
- Distinctive: line 19
In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
- Distinctive: line 135
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
- Distinctive: line 144
Rigid: follow exactly, don't adapt away discipline
- Very specific: line 152
When working in a monorepo (.groundwork.yml exists):
- Distinctive: line 153
Always check project context: before reading/writing specs
- Very specific: line 154
If {{project_name}} is empty, prompt the user to select a project
- Very specific: line 156
Use /groundwork:select-project to switch between projects
- Very specific: line 157
Use /groundwork:setup-repo to configure the repo structure
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
</EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
How to Access Skills
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
Using Skills
The Rule
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create task per checklist item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create task per checklist item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create task per checklist item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}Lifecycle Map — work → skill
Find the work, invoke the skill. Dispatch tier matters:
- (auto) — dual/library skills you invoke directly with the
Skilltool, or that other skills call. - (user runs) — user-only leaves (
disable-model-invocation: true). You cannot invoke or dispatch these; they are invisible to you at call time. When one fits, recommend the slash command and let the user run it. They are heavyweight or high-blast-radius (swarms, full PRD generation, autonomous loops, outward-facing deploy) on purpose.
Define / Discover
| Work | Skill |
| Generate a PRD/specs from scratch | /groundwork:design-product (user runs) |
| Clarify or stress-test a feature request | understanding-feature-requests (auto) |
| Design or reverse-engineer UX | /groundwork:ux-design, /groundwork:source-ux-design-from-code (user runs) |
| Reverse-engineer specs/architecture from existing code | /groundwork:source-product-specs-from-code, /groundwork:source-architecture-from-code (user runs) |
| Build/maintain the domain glossary | domain-modeling (auto) |
Plan / Architect
| Work | Skill |
| Translate PRD into architecture | design-architecture (auto) |
| Adversarial tech comparison across options | /groundwork:swarm-design-architecture (user runs) |
| Design a non-trivial module / interface / API | design-it-twice (auto) |
| Record a hard-to-reverse decision | captured in design-architecture (auto) |
| Break specs into tasks | /groundwork:create-tasks (user runs) |
| Plan a single task | plan-task (auto) |
| Verify task list covers the PRD | task-validation-loop (auto) |
| Check code ↔ spec alignment | check-specs-alignment (auto) |
| Convert single-file spec/arch to directory | split-specs, split-architecture (auto) |
Build
| Work | Skill |
| Execute task N / the next task | work-on, work-on-next-task (auto) |
| Implement a planned task in isolation | implement-task (auto) |
| Build without a task / autonomously | /groundwork:build-unplanned, /groundwork:just-do-it, /groundwork:just-do-it-swarming (user runs) |
| Write any feature or bugfix | test-driven-development (auto) |
| Ship thin slices behind a flag | vertical-slice (auto) |
| Pressure-test a high-stakes/irreversible decision | doubt-driven-development (auto) |
| Isolate work in a worktree | use-git-worktree (auto) |
Verify / Review / Debug
| Work | Skill |
| Local multi-agent validation + autofix | validate (auto) |
| Commit and merge a validated task worktree | finalize-task (auto) |
| Review a GitHub PR | /groundwork:review-pr (user runs) |
| Investigate a bug systematically | debug (auto), /groundwork:swarm-debug (user runs) |
Ship
| Work | Skill |
| Orchestrate the ship phase | /groundwork:ship (user runs) |
| Add logging/metrics/traces | instrument-observability (auto) |
| Roll out behind a flag in stages | staged-rollout (auto) |
Meta / Project
| Work | Skill |
| Configure repo / switch project | setup-repo, select-project (auto) |
| Hand off work to another session | handoff (auto) |
| Install or remove the optional statusline | /groundwork:statusline [install|uninstall] (user runs) |
| List skills / health-check the plugin | /groundwork:groundwork-help, /groundwork:groundwork-check (user runs) |
Red Flags
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
| "I'll just start working on the task" | Task execution REQUIRES the work-on skill. Invoke it first. |
| "Let me implement this task" | Always invoke work-on skill - it handles worktree isolation. |
Skill Priority
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
- Process skills first (design-product, design-architecture) - these determine HOW to approach the task
- Implementation skills second (tasks, test-driven-development) - these guide execution
"Let's build X" -> design-product first, then implementation skills.
Skill Types
Rigid: follow exactly, don't adapt away discipline
Flexible: adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which type it is.
Monorepo Awareness
When working in a monorepo (.groundwork.yml exists):
- Always check project context before reading/writing specs
- If
{{project_name}}is empty, prompt the user to select a project - All
{{specs_dir}}/paths resolve to the selected project's specs directory - Use
/groundwork:select-projectto switch between projects - Use
/groundwork:setup-repoto configure the repo structure
User Instructions
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

