agentleFS
PeanutGTPeanutGT/NutsSkills/skills/ship/SKILL.md

ship

Skill3 starsChanged 20 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when committing changes, writing a commit message, opening a pull request, or finishing a development branch. Covers branch naming, commit hygiene, PR descriptions, and the pre-merge checklist.

194 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ios-sync, open-gstack-browser and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-sync

    Regenerate the iOS debug bridge against the latest upstream gstack templates. (gstack)

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    open-gstack-browser

    Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • ayudaySkill

    setup-deploy

    Configure deployment settings for /land-and-deploy. Detects your deploy platform (Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, GitHub Actions, custom), production URL, health check endpoints, and deploy status commands. Writes the configuration to CLAUDE.md so all future deploys are automatic. Use when: "setup deploy", "configure deployment", "set up land-and-deploy", "how do I deploy with gstack", "add deploy config".

    Also in 19 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    landing-report

    Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • zebbernSkill

    debug-fix

    Find and fix a bug or issue — from any source (GitHub issue, error message, user report, or observed behavior)

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • ramybarsoumSkill

    document-release

    Post-ship documentation update. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, cleans up TODOS, and optionally bumps VERSION. Use when asked to "update the docs", "sync documentation", or "post-ship docs". Proactively suggest after a PR is merged or code is shipped.

    Also in 23 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 180 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Never commit directly to the default branch.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep PRs small enough to review in one sitting (rough guide: < 400 changed lines).

    line 51
  3. Distinctive:

    After merge: delete the branch, close related tickets, and note follow-ups.

    line 62
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask before pushing, force-pushing, or merging unless the user already said to.

    line 65
  5. Very specific:

    Never skip hooks (--no-verify) to make a commit pass.

    line 66

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 180 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Ship

Core rule: Nothing leaves your machine without passing verify.

Branches

  • Never commit directly to the default branch. Create type/short-description (e.g. feat/csv-export, fix/login-timeout).
  • One branch, one purpose.

Commits

  • Each commit is one coherent change that builds and passes tests.
  • Stage specific files; review git diff --staged before committing. Never commit secrets, build output, or local config.
  • Message format:
    <type>: <what changed, imperative, ≤ 72 chars>
    
    <why: the problem and the reason for this approach>
    Types: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore, perf.
  • The subject says what; the body says why. The diff already shows how.
  • For a bug fix, the body names the root cause found with debug, so the next person learns from it.

Pull requests

Template:

## What
One or two sentences.

## Why
The problem or ticket link.

## How
Key decisions and trade-offs; anything surprising.

## Testing
Commands run and results. Manual steps if any.

## Risk
What could break; rollback plan if relevant.
  • Keep PRs small enough to review in one sitting (rough guide: < 400 changed lines).
  • Separate refactors from behavior changes.

Pre-merge checklist

  • Tests, lint, type-check, build pass (output seen)
  • Diff contains only intended changes
  • No debug logs, TODOs without tickets, or commented-out code
  • Docs / changelog updated if behavior changed
  • Migrations reversible; feature flags in place for risky changes

Finishing a branch

After merge: delete the branch, close related tickets, and note follow-ups.

Rules

  • Ask before pushing, force-pushing, or merging unless the user already said to.
  • Never skip hooks (--no-verify) to make a commit pass. Fix the cause.

Related: verify, code-review.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.