risk-assessment
Skill1 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use after all research skills to synthesize SWOT analysis, risk evaluation, and mitigation strategies — requires run_id and all prior sections
19 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- staskh/trading_skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- s977043/PlanGatetheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- PaulDanielYoung/internal-audit-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- artherahq/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 19
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- staskh/trading_skills★ 405same name
- GAJETOso/financeskills★ 47same name
- DefiLlama/defillama-skills★ 32same name
- ishenli/investment-agent★ 10same name
- microsoft/aibast-agents-library★ 8same name
- RiskResponse/ciso-security-skills★ 8same name
- artherahq/skills★ 3same name
- artheras/skills★ 3same name
- s977043/PlanGate★ 3same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- brainstormingSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- financial-modelingSkill
- idea-intakeSkill
- market-researchSkill
- report-generationSkill
- using-business-validatorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
If any file is missing, stop and inform the user which skill needs to run first.
- Distinctive: line 25
All four files listed above
- Distinctive: line 54
Read all files using the exact run_id.
- Very specific: line 76
Ensure the output directory exists: mkdir -p docs/reports/<run_id>
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Risk Assessment
Overview
Synthesize all prior research (market, competitors, financials) into a SWOT analysis and detailed risk assessment with mitigation strategies.
<HARD-GATE>
You MUST read ALL prior sections before writing the risk assessment. This skill synthesizes — it does not research independently. Required inputs (all using exact run_id):
- `docs/business-briefs/<run_id>.md`
- `docs/reports/<run_id>/01-market-research.md`
- `docs/reports/<run_id>/02-competitor-analysis.md`
- `docs/reports/<run_id>/03-financial-model.md`If any file is missing, stop and inform the user which skill needs to run first.
</HARD-GATE>
Inputs
- run_id: From idea-intake (format:
YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-<hhmm>) - All four files listed above
Output
- File:
docs/reports/<run_id>/04-risk-assessment.md
Process
digraph risk_assessment {
"Verify run_id and all inputs exist" [shape=box];
"Read all prior sections" [shape=box];
"Build SWOT matrix" [shape=box];
"Identify key risks" [shape=box];
"Score probability and impact" [shape=box];
"Develop mitigation strategies" [shape=box];
"Write 04-risk-assessment.md" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#e8f5e9"];
"Verify run_id and all inputs exist" -> "Read all prior sections";
"Read all prior sections" -> "Build SWOT matrix";
"Build SWOT matrix" -> "Identify key risks";
"Identify key risks" -> "Score probability and impact";
"Score probability and impact" -> "Develop mitigation strategies";
"Develop mitigation strategies" -> "Write 04-risk-assessment.md";
}Step 1: Read All Prior Sections
Read all files using the exact run_id. Synthesize key findings from each.
Step 2: Build SWOT Matrix
Draw from all sources:
- Strengths: What advantages does this idea have? (unique features, team, timing)
- Weaknesses: What internal factors work against it? (resources, experience, gaps)
- Opportunities: What external factors favor it? (trends, gaps, regulation changes)
- Threats: What external factors endanger it? (competitors, regulation, market shifts)
Step 3: Identify and Score Risks
For each risk:
- Category: Market / Technical / Financial / Operational / Legal
- Probability: High / Medium / Low
- Impact: High / Medium / Low
- Severity: Critical / High / Medium / Low (derived from probability x impact)
- Mitigation strategy
- Contingency plan
Step 4: Write Output
Ensure the output directory exists: mkdir -p docs/reports/<run_id>
Save to docs/reports/<run_id>/04-risk-assessment.md:
## SWOT Analysis
**Run ID:** <run_id>
| | Helpful | Harmful |
|---|---------|---------|
| **Internal** | **Strengths** | **Weaknesses** |
| | - [S1] | - [W1] |
| | - [S2] | - [W2] |
| **External** | **Opportunities** | **Threats** |
| | - [O1] | - [T1] |
| | - [O2] | - [T2] |
## Risk Assessment
### Risk Matrix
| # | Risk | Category | Probability | Impact | Severity |
|---|------|----------|-------------|--------|----------|
| 1 | [description] | Market | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | Critical/High/Med/Low |
| 2 | [description] | Financial | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | Critical/High/Med/Low |
### Detailed Risk Analysis
#### Risk 1: [Name]
- **Description:** [what could go wrong]
- **Trigger:** [what would cause this]
- **Impact:** [consequences if it happens]
- **Mitigation:** [how to prevent or reduce]
- **Contingency:** [what to do if it happens anyway]
### Risk Summary
- **Critical risks:** X
- **High risks:** X
- **Medium risks:** X
- **Low risks:** X
- **Overall risk profile:** [Low / Moderate / High / Very High]Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

