agentleFS
s977043s977043/PlanGate/.agents/skills/risk-assessment/SKILL.md

risk-assessment

Skill3 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

制約・未確定要素・技術的リスクを洗い出し、severity と mitigation を付けて一覧化する。Use when: WF-02/WF-03 でリスク評価が必要な時、Unknown を可視化して判断を促したい時、影響範囲を明確化したい時。

19 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Risk Assessment

プロジェクトの制約・未確定要素・技術的リスクを列挙し、severity と mitigation を付して可視化する Skill。

カテゴリ

Check

想定 Phase

WF-02 Requirement Expansion / WF-03 Solution Design

入力

  • requirements(確定部分)
  • 既存アーキテクチャ / 依存ライブラリ
  • 過去の類似案件の振り返り(あれば)

出力

リスク一覧(テーブル形式):

| Risk | Severity (critical/major/minor/info) | Mitigation |

加えて:

  • Unknowns(未確定事項の列挙と解消方針)
  • Assumptions(前提条件の明文化)

使い方

  • WF-02 で qa-reviewer が呼び出す(要件段階のリスク)
  • WF-03 で solution-architect が呼び出す(設計段階のリスク)

関連

  • Workflow: docs/workflows/02_requirement_expansion.md, docs/workflows/03_solution_design.md(配布対象外。install.sh --claude / plugin / Codex の 3 経路とも導入先には配置されない。解決できない場合は本 Skill の記述を代替正本とし、「正本 <path> を参照できなかった」と明示する)
  • 連携 Skill: architecture-sketch
  • Rule: Rule 2

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.