create-prd
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Guided, section-by-section PRD authoring for a single product feature. Gathers context from the product concept and existing PRDs, walks through each required section collaboratively, and writes to product/prd/prd-<feature>.md. Product-track counterpart of /design-system.
44 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- drvoss/everything-copilot-clitheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
- daviszhen/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- fnayou/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use prioritize-features, brainstorm-okrs and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
skytiger6724Skillprioritize-features
Prioritize a backlog of feature ideas based on impact, effort, risk, and strategic alignment with top 5 recommendations. Use when prioritizing a feature backlog, making scope decisions, or ranking product ideas.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-okrs
Brainstorm team-level OKRs aligned with company objectives — qualitative objectives with measurable key results. Use when setting quarterly OKRs, aligning team goals with company strategy, drafting objectives, or learning how to write effective OKRs.
Also in 4 projects that use this
miovragSkillstrategy-red-team
Red-team a PRD, roadmap, or strategy by attacking its load-bearing assumptions before reality does. Steelmans then attacks each claim, ranks failure modes by impact × likelihood × cheapness-to-test, and returns the cheapest test and kill criteria for each. Use when stress-testing a plan, pressure-testing a strategy, challenging assumptions, or preparing a doc for executive review.
Also in 3 projects that use this
launchapp-devSkillinterview-script
Create a structured user interview script with warm-up, core exploration, and wrap-up sections. Use when preparing for user research interviews to ensure consistent, insightful conversations.
Also in 4 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillbeachhead-segment
Identify the first beachhead market segment for a product launch.
Also in 4 projects that use this
nandanosqlSkillcustomer-journey-map
Map the complete customer experience across all touchpoints using the NNGroup framework. Identifies pain points, emotions, and opportunities at every stage of the user journey.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +5 more from skytiger6724
Other versions44 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 1796% same
Wrote their own version · 43
- karrioapi/karrio★ 799same name
- waynesutton/markdown-site★ 628same name
- platformplatform/PlatformPlatform★ 439same name
- nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow★ 300same name
- thedesignproject/agent-skills★ 88same name
- drvoss/everything-copilot-cli★ 48same name
- uniffy-io/uniffy★ 26same name
- Scofy0123/prd-writing-toolkit★ 16same name
- justinyoo/skills★ 6same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
33 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository90 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adoptSkill
- api-cost-gateSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- art-bibleSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- asset-specSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- brainstormSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- bug-triageSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- content-auditSkill
- create-architectureSkill
- create-control-manifestSkill
- create-epicsSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- day-one-patchSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- doc-relinkSkill
- estimateSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- governance-bible-initSkill
- helpSkill
- hotfixSkill
- humanize-koreanSkill
- humanize-redoSkill
- humanizeSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- legacy-purgeSkill
- lesson-logSkill
- lesson-reviewSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- playtest-reportSkill
- product-conceptSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- propagate-design-changeSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qa-planSkill
- quick-designSkill
- regression-suiteSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- remove-bgSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- review-all-gddsSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- security-auditSkill
- self-loopSkill
- setup-engineSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
When this skill is invoked:
- Very specific: line 14
If --review [full|lean|solo] was passed → use that
- Very specific: line 20
Check if product/prd/product-concept.md exists.
- Very specific: line 21
If it exists: read its scope/feature list, find the highest-priority feature without a PRD (product/prd/prd-<feature>.md does not exist), …
- Distinctive: line 26
If no product concept exists, fail with:
- Very specific: line 34
If product/prd/prd-<feature>.md already exists, do NOT overwrite.
- Distinctive: line 42
Read all relevant context before asking the user anything:
- Distinctive: line 61
Do not fabricate business facts (pricing, launch dates, user counts) — ask.
- Distinctive: line 80
After drafting all sections, show the user a compact summary of what will be written and ask for approval before writing the file:
- Distinctive: line 85
Only write after explicit approval.
- Distinctive: line 100
All 8 sections present, none placeholder-only
- Distinctive: line 101
Every success metric has a number and a measurement source
- Distinctive: line 102
Every acceptance criterion maps to an FR
- Very specific: line 116
All MVP features covered? → /create-architecture (Architecture phase)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When this skill is invoked:
1. Parse Arguments & Validate
Resolve the review mode (once, store for all gate spawns this run):
- If
--review [full|lean|solo]was passed → use that - Else read
production/review-mode.txt→ use that value - Else → default to
lean
A feature name is required. If missing:
- Check if
product/prd/product-concept.mdexists. - If it exists: read its scope/feature list, find the highest-priority feature
without a PRD (
product/prd/prd-<feature>.mddoes not exist), and useAskUserQuestion:- Prompt: "The next feature without a PRD is [feature-name]. Author its PRD?"
- Options:
[A] Yes — write the PRD for [feature-name]/[B] Pick a different feature/[C] Stop here
- If no product concept exists, fail with:
"Usage:
/create-prd <feature-name>— e.g.,/create-prd onboardingNo product concept found. Run/product-conceptfirst — it writesproduct/prd/product-concept.md, which this skill reads."
Normalize the feature name to kebab-case for the filename
(e.g., "user onboarding" becomes prd-user-onboarding.md).
If product/prd/prd-<feature>.md already exists, do NOT overwrite. Offer
retrofit: identify missing/placeholder sections and fill only those (mirror
/design-system retrofit behavior — never touch existing section content).
2. Gather Context (Read Phase)
Read all relevant context before asking the user anything:
- Product concept:
product/prd/product-concept.md— problem, users, value proposition, scope tiers. Fail if missing (see above). - Stack pin:
.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md— platform, framework, constraints. If missing, warn: stack-unaware PRDs breed infeasible requirements. - Existing PRDs: Glob
product/prd/prd-*.md— read titles + dependency sections to cross-reference. A new PRD must not contradict or duplicate an existing one. - Accessibility tier:
design/accessibility-requirements.mdif present — requirements below must respect the committed tier. - UX specs: Glob
design/ux/*.mdfor screens this feature touches.
3. Author Section by Section (Write Phase)
Walk the user through each required section in order, one at a time: propose a draft from the context you read, ask for corrections, then move on. Do not fabricate business facts (pricing, launch dates, user counts) — ask.
Required sections (all 8 must exist for the PRD to pass review):
- Overview & Problem — the user problem, evidence it exists, why now
- Goals & Success Metrics — measurable targets with numbers and a measurement source (analytics event, funnel step). "Users are happier" is not a metric.
- Users & Scenarios — target segment(s) and 2-4 concrete usage scenarios
- Scope (MoSCoW) — Must / Should / Could / Won't for this release. The Won't list is mandatory — an empty Won't list means scope was not decided.
- Functional Requirements — numbered FR-1, FR-2, … testable statements
- Non-Functional Requirements — performance, security, accessibility (cite the committed tier), i18n, offline behavior where relevant
- Dependencies — other PRDs, ADRs, external services; each with a note on what breaks if the dependency slips
- Acceptance Criteria — checkable list a QA agent can verify; each criterion maps to at least one FR
After drafting all sections, show the user a compact summary of what will be written and ask for approval before writing the file:
"May I write this PRD to
product/prd/prd-<feature>.md?"
Only write after explicit approval. Write the full document with frontmatter:
---
feature: <feature-name>
status: Draft # Draft → In Review → Approved
version: 0.1
---4. Verdict & Handoff
Self-check before closing (all must hold, else fix before reporting):
- All 8 sections present, none placeholder-only
- Every success metric has a number and a measurement source
- Every acceptance criterion maps to an FR
- Won't list is non-empty
Report the verdict:
- COMPLETE — PRD written, all checks hold. Set
status: In Review. - BLOCKED — a business fact is missing and the user must decide (name it).
Recommended next steps
/design-review product/prd/prd-<feature>.md— validate the PRD before it feeds architecture/ux-design— author UX specs for this feature's key screens- More features to specify? Run
/create-prdagain — the catalog step is repeatable (one PRD per feature) - All MVP features covered? →
/create-architecture(Architecture phase)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

