agentleFS
dawn840705dawn840705/claude-code-studios/skills/create-control-manifest/SKILL.md

create-control-manifest

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

After architecture is complete, produces a flat actionable rules sheet for programmers — what you must do, what you must never do, per system and per layer. Extracted from all Accepted ADRs, technical preferences, and engine reference docs. More immediately actionable than ADRs (which explain why).

9 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use vertical-slice.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • hongyuancSkill

    vertical-slice

    Build and evaluate a production-quality vertical slice before advancing from Pre-Production to Production.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. 10 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • 10

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    When to run: After /architecture-review passes and ADRs are in Accepted status.

    line 19
  2. Very specific:

    Read docs/engine-reference/[engine]/VERSION.md for engine + version

    line 38
  3. Very specific:

    Read docs/engine-reference/[engine]/deprecated-apis.md — these become forbidden API entries

    line 39
  4. Very specific:

    Read docs/engine-reference/[engine]/current-best-practices.md if it exists

    line 41
  5. Common:

    Every "must", "should", "required to", "always" statement

    line 52
  6. Common:

    Every specific pattern or approach mandated

    line 53
  7. Common:

    Every alternative that was explicitly rejected — *why* it was rejected becomes the rule ("never use X because Y")

    line 56
  8. Common:

    If an ADR spans multiple layers, duplicate the rule into each relevant layer.

    line 76
  9. Common:

    All deprecated APIs → Forbidden API entries

    line 89
  10. Common:

    Before writing the manifest, present a summary to the user:

    line 101
  11. Distinctive:

    Ask: "Does this look complete?

    line 115
  12. Common:

    All mandatory ADR patterns are captured and accurately stated

    line 131
  13. Common:

    No rules were added that lack a source ADR or preference document

    line 133
  14. Very specific:

    Ask: "May I write this to docs/architecture/control-manifest.md?"

    line 145
  15. Common:

    After writing the manifest:

    line 259
  16. Very specific:

    If epics/stories don't exist yet: "Run /create-epics layer: foundation then /create-stories [epic-slug] — programmers can now use this …

    line 261
  17. Common:

    If this is a regeneration (manifest already existed): "Updated.

    line 263

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Create Control Manifest

The Control Manifest is a flat, actionable rules sheet for programmers. It answers "what do I do?" and "what must I never do?" — organized by architectural layer, extracted from all Accepted ADRs, technical preferences, and engine reference docs. Where ADRs explain why, the manifest tells you what.

Output: docs/architecture/control-manifest.md

When to run: After /architecture-review passes and ADRs are in Accepted status. Re-run whenever new ADRs are accepted or existing ADRs are revised.


1. Load All Inputs

ADRs

  • Glob docs/architecture/adr-*.md and read every file
  • Filter to only Accepted ADRs (Status: Accepted) — skip Proposed, Deprecated, Superseded
  • Note the ADR number and title for every rule sourced

Technical Preferences

  • Read .claude/docs/technical-preferences.md
  • Extract: naming conventions, performance budgets, approved libraries/addons, forbidden patterns

Engine Reference

  • Read docs/engine-reference/[engine]/VERSION.md for engine + version
  • Read docs/engine-reference/[engine]/deprecated-apis.md — these become forbidden API entries
  • Read docs/engine-reference/[engine]/current-best-practices.md if it exists

Report: "Loaded [N] Accepted ADRs, engine: [name + version]."


2. Extract Rules from Each ADR

For each Accepted ADR, extract:

Required Patterns (from "Implementation Guidelines" section)

  • Every "must", "should", "required to", "always" statement
  • Every specific pattern or approach mandated

Forbidden Approaches (from "Alternatives Considered" sections)

  • Every alternative that was explicitly rejected — why it was rejected becomes the rule ("never use X because Y")
  • Any anti-patterns explicitly called out

Performance Guardrails (from "Performance Implications" section)

  • Budget constraints: "max N ms per frame for this system"
  • Memory limits: "this system must not exceed N MB"

Engine API Constraints (from "Engine Compatibility" section)

  • Post-cutoff APIs that require verification
  • Verified behaviours that differ from default LLM assumptions
  • API fields or methods that behave differently in the pinned engine version

Layer Classification

Classify each rule by the architectural layer of the system it governs:

  • Foundation: Scene management, event architecture, save/load, engine init
  • Core: Core gameplay loops, main player systems, physics/collision
  • Feature: Secondary systems, secondary mechanics, AI
  • Presentation: Rendering, audio, UI, VFX, shaders

If an ADR spans multiple layers, duplicate the rule into each relevant layer.


3. Add Global Rules

Combine rules that apply to all layers:

From technical-preferences.md:

  • Naming conventions (classes, variables, signals/events, files, constants)
  • Performance budgets (target framerate, frame budget, draw call limits, memory ceiling)

From deprecated-apis.md:

  • All deprecated APIs → Forbidden API entries

From current-best-practices.md (if available):

  • Engine-recommended patterns → Required entries

From technical-preferences.md forbidden patterns:

  • Copy any "Forbidden Patterns" entries directly

4. Present Rules Summary Before Writing

Before writing the manifest, present a summary to the user:

## Control Manifest Preview
Engine: [name + version]
ADRs covered: [list ADR numbers]
Total rules extracted:
  - Foundation layer: [N] required, [M] forbidden, [P] guardrails
  - Core layer: [N] required, [M] forbidden, [P] guardrails
  - Feature layer: ...
  - Presentation layer: ...
  - Global: [N] naming conventions, [M] forbidden APIs, [P] approved libraries

Ask: "Does this look complete? Any rules to add or remove before I write the manifest?"


4b. Director Gate — Technical Review

Review mode check — apply before spawning TD-MANIFEST:

  • solo → skip. Note: "TD-MANIFEST skipped — Solo mode." Proceed to Phase 5.
  • lean → skip. Note: "TD-MANIFEST skipped — Lean mode." Proceed to Phase 5.
  • full → spawn as normal.

Spawn technical-director via Task using gate TD-MANIFEST (.claude/docs/director-gates.md).

Pass: the Control Manifest Preview from Phase 4 (rule counts per layer, full extracted rule list), the list of ADRs covered, engine version, and any rules sourced from technical-preferences.md or engine reference docs.

The technical-director reviews whether:

  • All mandatory ADR patterns are captured and accurately stated
  • Forbidden approaches are complete and correctly attributed
  • No rules were added that lack a source ADR or preference document
  • Performance guardrails are consistent with the ADR constraints

Apply the verdict:

  • APPROVE → proceed to Phase 5
  • CONCERNS → surface via AskUserQuestion with options: Revise flagged rules / Accept and proceed / Discuss further
  • REJECT → do not write the manifest; fix the flagged rules and re-present the summary

5. Write the Control Manifest

Ask: "May I write this to docs/architecture/control-manifest.md?"

Format:

# Control Manifest

> **Engine**: [name + version]
> **Last Updated**: [date]
> **Manifest Version**: [date]
> **ADRs Covered**: [ADR-NNNN, ADR-MMMM, ...]
> **Status**: [Active — regenerate with `/create-control-manifest update` when ADRs change]

`Manifest Version` is the date this manifest was generated. Story files embed
this date when created. `/story-readiness` compares a story's embedded version
to this field to detect stories written against stale rules. Always matches
`Last Updated` — they are the same date, serving different consumers.

This manifest is a programmer's quick-reference extracted from all Accepted ADRs,
technical preferences, and engine reference docs. For the reasoning behind each
rule, see the referenced ADR.

---

## Foundation Layer Rules

*Applies to: scene management, event architecture, save/load, engine initialisation*

### Required Patterns
- **[rule]** — source: [ADR-NNNN]
- **[rule]** — source: [ADR-NNNN]

### Forbidden Approaches
- **Never [anti-pattern]** — [brief reason] — source: [ADR-NNNN]

### Performance Guardrails
- **[system]**: max [N]ms/frame — source: [ADR-NNNN]

---

## Core Layer Rules

*Applies to: core gameplay loop, main player systems, physics, collision*

### Required Patterns
...

### Forbidden Approaches
...

### Performance Guardrails
...

---

## Feature Layer Rules

*Applies to: secondary mechanics, AI systems, secondary features*

### Required Patterns
...

### Forbidden Approaches
...

---

## Presentation Layer Rules

*Applies to: rendering, audio, UI, VFX, shaders, animations*

### Required Patterns
...

### Forbidden Approaches
...

---

## Global Rules (All Layers)

### Naming Conventions
| Element | Convention | Example |
|---------|-----------|---------|
| Classes | [from technical-preferences] | [example] |
| Variables | [from technical-preferences] | [example] |
| Signals/Events | [from technical-preferences] | [example] |
| Files | [from technical-preferences] | [example] |
| Constants | [from technical-preferences] | [example] |

### Performance Budgets
| Target | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Framerate | [from technical-preferences] |
| Frame budget | [from technical-preferences] |
| Draw calls | [from technical-preferences] |
| Memory ceiling | [from technical-preferences] |

### Approved Libraries / Addons
- [library] — approved for [purpose]

### Forbidden APIs ([engine version])
These APIs are deprecated or unverified for [engine + version]:
- `[api name]` — deprecated since [version] / unverified post-cutoff
- Source: `docs/engine-reference/[engine]/deprecated-apis.md`

### Cross-Cutting Constraints
- [constraint that applies everywhere, regardless of layer]

6. Suggest Next Steps

After writing the manifest:

  • If epics/stories don't exist yet: "Run /create-epics layer: foundation then /create-stories [epic-slug] — programmers can now use this manifest when writing story implementation notes."
  • If this is a regeneration (manifest already existed): "Updated. Recommend notifying the team of changed rules — especially any new Forbidden entries."

Collaborative Protocol

  1. Load silently — read all inputs before presenting anything
  2. Show the summary first — let the user see the scope before writing
  3. Ask before writing — always confirm before creating or overwriting the manifest. On write: Verdict: COMPLETE — control manifest written. On decline: Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined write.
  4. Source every rule — never add a rule that doesn't trace to an ADR, a technical preference, or an engine reference doc
  5. No interpretation — extract rules as stated in ADRs; do not paraphrase in ways that change meaning

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.