start-task
Skill1 starsChanged 56 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Finish implementation or review directly by default, escalating for uncertainty or risk. Load this entry together with independent reads of known task files.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
If these instructions are already supplied in context, use them without rereading the entry.
- Distinctive: line 65
Standard: read the standard path. Keep coupled work with one owner.
- Distinctive: line 67
Audit: read the operating contract and runtime fast path, then follow the full v1 contract.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Start Task
Contract: vulpora.start-task-profile/v1; vulpora.start-task/v1 applies only to audit.
Invoke $start-task (Codex, also /skills) or /start-task (Claude Code) with one non-empty task description.
Accept exactly one leading --lightweight, --standard, or --audit token; otherwise use auto. Remove that
token once and preserve the remaining host-parsed description as data. Never evaluate or shell-split task text.
Reject empty or malformed input before discovery.
Select once
If these instructions are already supplied in context, use them without rereading the entry.
Inspect the relevant repository files and instructions. Run the bundled scripts/select-execution-profile.js
with this JSON shape on stdin, adjusting every signal to observed facts and the requested profile. Resolve
the script relative to this installed skill; no source-code or reference read is needed to invoke it.
{
"schema": "vulpora.start-task-profile-input/v1",
"requested_profile": "auto",
"task": {
"scoped_target": true,
"acceptance_known": true,
"verification_known": true,
"material_unknown_count": 0,
"independent_lane_count": 1,
"broad_change_scope": false,
"shared_public_contract_or_schema": false,
"risk": {
"destructive_or_irreversible": false,
"security_or_authorization_boundary": false,
"credential_access": false,
"production_data_migration_or_backfill": false,
"production_deployment_or_multi_service_release": false,
"external_side_effects_not_easily_reversible": false,
"regulatory_or_audit_evidence_required": false
}
}
}The values above illustrate a clear, reversible task, not defaults for unknown facts. Mark unresolved scope,
acceptance, or verification false and count material unknowns. Count coupled changes as one lane. Any true risk
signal forces audit, even with explicit --lightweight. Ordinary shared contracts, broad scope, unknowns, or
independent lanes select standard automatically. Correct rejected input; never invent a successful decision.
Rerun only when new facts change the signals, escalating before the affected action. Selection grants no authority.
Once inspection supports an expected lightweight result, batch the selector, prepared edit, and checks in one
conditional tool call. Print the decision; require selector exit zero and parsed profile === "lightweight"
before any write. A failed, malformed, or different decision must stop the batch; follow the selected path before
implementation. Never run selection and writes concurrently. Keep the guard in the tool call, without adding a
wrapper file or another confirmation turn.
Execute the selected profile
- Lightweight: these instructions are complete; no additional workflow references are required. Keep one concise brief in session context: goal, scope, decisions, acceptance, verification, risks. The existing progress message can serve as the brief. Implement directly with one primary owner; no execution child. Ask only about material blockers or new authority; an implementation request already authorizes ordinary in-scope edits.
- Standard: read the standard path. Keep coupled work with one owner; use a short plan and batch material questions. Load transport/model references only for actual delegation.
- Audit: read the operating contract and runtime fast path, then follow the full v1 contract.
For lightweight/standard, do not create run directories. Do not create a ledger, frozen DAG, route receipt, hash projection, or formal orchestration report. Standard delegation may create its bounded transport records. Run the narrowest repository-native checks proving the changed behavior; repeat only after new changes, failures, or evidence that existing results are insufficient. Inspect the diff, preserve user changes, and report changed files, observed verification, and material remaining risk. Resolve known in-scope errors before finishing; if verification is blocked, report the verified subset and exact blocker without claiming completion.
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 15
- devoxx/DevoxxGenieIDEAPlugin★ 685same name
- nockawa/Typhon★ 251same name
- mattias800/prosper★ 181same name
- maotoumao/Cebian★ 178same name
- fathomise/MailFathom★ 20same name
- Krzysztof318/MailFathom★ 20same name
- ymatrix1/vantage★ 17same name
- sensei-hacker/inav-claude★ 6same name
- a-ghorbani/pocketpal-dev-team★ 4same name
- lutzleonhardt/casefile★ 3same name
5 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository65 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-evalSkill
- architecture-review-workflowSkill
- backend-code-review-workflowSkill
- code-authoring-routerSkill
- code-diagram-extractSkill
- codex-agent-runtimeSkill
- design-pattern-applySkill
- diagram-stylerSkill
- document-designerSkill
- e2e-evidence-reportSkill
- e2e-report-rendererSkill
- e2e-runnerSkill
- e2e-scenario-authorSkill
- e2e-test-workflowSkill
- entitySkill
- enumSkill
- explore-dead-codeSkill
- flywaySkill
- git-flowSkill
- harness-proposeSkill
- harness-refineSkill
- java-spring-review-workflowSkill
- knowledge-auditSkill
- korean-dev-writerSkill
- kotlin-code-authoringSkill
- kotlin-spring-reviewSkill
- kotlin-spring-review-workflowSkill
- learnSkill
- mapperSkill
- markdown-publisherSkill
- mermaid-diagramsSkill
- mssql-code-authoringSkill
- nl-sql-querySkill
- notion-domain-contextSkill
- oop-design-reviewSkill
- opensearch-code-authoringSkill
- opensearch-optimizationSkill
- opensearch-query-reviewSkill
- opensearch-review-workflowSkill
- opensearch-schema-reviewSkill
- pdf-qaSkill
- playwright-e2eSkill
- postgres-code-authoringSkill
- postgres-query-reviewSkill
- postgres-review-workflowSkill
- postgres-risk-checkSkill
- postgres-schema-designSkill
- product-requirementsSkill
- product-ui-designSkill
- refactoring-catalogSkill
- repositorySkill
- requestSkill
- responseSkill
- retroSkill
- schema-doc-extractSkill
- security-scan-workflowSkill
- serviceSkill
- skill-updaterSkill
- test-authoringSkill
- test-quality-refactoring-workflowSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

