e2e-runner
Skill1 starsChanged 56 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Run repository E2E or integration tests in an isolated Testcontainers environment; use for E2E, integration, QA, or full test requests.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Run a catalog or existing integration suite only when its framework, run-owned infrastructure, and verification evidence can be proven.
- Very specific: line 14
Before detailed execution, read the complete execution contract and run node scripts/detect-test-profile.js <repository-root> once for …
- Distinctive: line 26
Read principles only to resolve a rationale question, and use the KB index only if these routes do not identify the needed topic.
- Distinctive: line 34
Keep one environment owner.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
E2E Runner — Execution & Reporting Protocol
Purpose
Run a catalog or existing integration suite only when its framework, run-owned infrastructure, and verification evidence can be proven. Default to terminal-only results and remove transient artifacts; create a report only when explicitly requested.
Prerequisites
Before detailed execution, read the complete execution contract and run
node scripts/detect-test-profile.js <repository-root> once for bounded discovery. Select only the needed topic:
| Evidence or task | Read next |
| Testcontainers topology, data ownership, or bootstrap | Environment and data |
| HTTP scenario assertions | HTTP API E2E |
| Kafka/outbox or eventual consistency | Async execution |
| Persistent body/log artifacts | Masking and evidence |
| Build-task or CI integration | CI integration |
| Timing/order diagnosis | Flaky tests |
Read principles only to resolve a rationale question, and use the KB index only if these routes do not identify the needed topic. Neither is a blanket preflight dependency. The complete RUN contract remains mandatory; one owner still controls the full lifecycle.
Instructions
- Refuse user-owned Compose/runtime mutation: Testcontainers only; no user-owned Compose mutation.
- Validate the catalog with
validate-catalog.js <catalog> <contract> <inventory>before any execution. A malformed, stale, or unproven catalog stops the run. - Keep one environment owner. RUN-7.0 (One environment owner) applies to every topology; a Catalog harness: owns its complete Testcontainers, application, and client lifecycle.
- Support only proven Spring Boot or NestJS modules and require positive container-start proof, scenario evidence, masking, cleanup, and a terminal verdict as defined in the execution contract.
Canonical operating-contract checkpoints
The normative definitions live in the canonical operating contract. These summaries are execution checkpoints, not replacement rules:
- RUN-6.3 (Bounded test-profile discovery): run
node scripts/detect-test-profile.js <repository-root>once, retain its complete JSON, and respect its limit of at most 12 nearby test files. - RUN-16.4 (Framework evidence): preserve that profile unchanged as
git.testProfile, including framework, fixture, inspected-file, and read-budget evidence. - RUN-6.4 (Infrastructure and existing-suite discovery): use the same bounded profile to select a source-backed existing suite and its reported native command; Compose remains evidence only.
- RUN-16.5 (Infrastructure evidence): record Docker context, Testcontainers state, capability inventory, selected candidate, exact argv, fresh XML, validator verdict, and lifecycle owner.
- RUN-7.0 (One environment owner): one process owns network, infrastructure, initialization, application, and test client in order. Host Docker installation via
sudo, Homebrew, apt, or Docker Desktop installers is outside test setup. - RUN-7.3 (Two-level cleanup): keep containers run-scoped and data case-scoped, then verify case cleanup, reverse teardown, absence probes, and zero orphans.
- RUN-7.4 (Ephemeral framework artifacts): snapshot pre-existing results, summarize generated XML, and restore and audit in
finally. Do not createtest-report/e2ein ephemeral mode. - RUN-8 (Positive proof; no fallback): run
node scripts/validate-container-test-result.js <xml> <class> <started-at-ms>and require fresh, non-skipped test results plus positive container-start evidence; never fall back to another environment. - RUN-16.6 (Bootstrap evidence): record the fixture graph, images, dynamic bindings, probes, test-scope bootstrap changes, positive runtime proof, cleanup, teardown, and orphan audit; missing evidence forbids PASS.
- RUN-17.2 (Actionable non-PASS remediation): classify every non-PASS result and provide bounded, evidence-backed test and infrastructure remediation with exact validation commands.
- RUN-18.1 (False-green-safe exit matrix): materialize the verdict input and run
node scripts/evaluate-run-verdict.js <run-result.json>; use only the canonical PASS/PARTIAL/BLOCKED/INCONCLUSIVE exit mapping. - RUN-18.2 (Diagnostic-only exception): only the exact
--diagnostic-onlyevaluator mode may narrowly bypass an eligible INCONCLUSIVE exit; it never changes the recorded verdict or relaxes lifecycle proof.
Examples
- A focused existing integration test: detect its repository-native command, run it once in its owned environment, then report PASS, FAIL, BLOCKED, or UNTRUSTED_ENVIRONMENT.
- A catalog run: reject a stale fingerprint until the user explicitly accepts the recorded risk; never rewrite the catalog.
Limitations
This skill does not start or reuse shared Compose services, invent framework configuration, retry failures, or turn incomplete infrastructure evidence into PASS. Rules not summarized above, the report schema, and partial-run handling remain in the canonical operating contract.
Troubleshooting
| Condition | Resolution |
| No proven test profile or owned environment | Stop as BLOCKED and state the missing evidence. |
| Catalog is stale or malformed | Follow the contract's stale/validation path; do not repair it while running. |
| Test fails | Preserve the observed result and use the bounded remediation path; do not retry silently. |
Verify
Require tests > 0, positive owned-environment evidence, masked artifacts when requested, cleanup evidence, and an outcome that matches the observed command result.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- myths-labs/muse★ 37same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository65 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-evalSkill
- architecture-review-workflowSkill
- backend-code-review-workflowSkill
- code-authoring-routerSkill
- code-diagram-extractSkill
- codex-agent-runtimeSkill
- design-pattern-applySkill
- diagram-stylerSkill
- document-designerSkill
- e2e-evidence-reportSkill
- e2e-report-rendererSkill
- e2e-scenario-authorSkill
- e2e-test-workflowSkill
- entitySkill
- enumSkill
- explore-dead-codeSkill
- flywaySkill
- git-flowSkill
- harness-proposeSkill
- harness-refineSkill
- java-spring-review-workflowSkill
- knowledge-auditSkill
- korean-dev-writerSkill
- kotlin-code-authoringSkill
- kotlin-spring-reviewSkill
- kotlin-spring-review-workflowSkill
- learnSkill
- mapperSkill
- markdown-publisherSkill
- mermaid-diagramsSkill
- mssql-code-authoringSkill
- nl-sql-querySkill
- notion-domain-contextSkill
- oop-design-reviewSkill
- opensearch-code-authoringSkill
- opensearch-optimizationSkill
- opensearch-query-reviewSkill
- opensearch-review-workflowSkill
- opensearch-schema-reviewSkill
- pdf-qaSkill
- playwright-e2eSkill
- postgres-code-authoringSkill
- postgres-query-reviewSkill
- postgres-review-workflowSkill
- postgres-risk-checkSkill
- postgres-schema-designSkill
- product-requirementsSkill
- product-ui-designSkill
- refactoring-catalogSkill
- repositorySkill
- requestSkill
- responseSkill
- retroSkill
- schema-doc-extractSkill
- security-scan-workflowSkill
- serviceSkill
- skill-updaterSkill
- start-taskSkill
- test-authoringSkill
- test-quality-refactoring-workflowSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

