git-flow
Skill1 starsChanged 56 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Prepare a safe work branch or commit, push, and open a GitLab merge request when the user asks to start, land, or publish implementation work.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Before implementation, read branch preparation.
- Distinctive: line 19
Keep the current branch; do not run branch preparation over existing changes.
- Distinctive: line 21
Read principles only for rationale, and the KB index only to find a needed transport or policy topic.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
git-flow — Work Branch and Commit/Push/MR Skill
Purpose
Prepare an updated child branch before implementation, or land an existing non-protected work branch through explicit staging, Korean commit messages, push, and one GitLab merge request.
Prerequisites
Select the requested path before any Git mutation:
- Before implementation, read branch preparation. This path ends after the child branch is ready; it does not load commit, transport, or MR recipes.
- To land existing work, read the complete commit/push/MR contract. Keep the current branch; do not run branch preparation over existing changes.
Read principles only for rationale, and the KB index only to
find a needed transport or policy topic. They are not unconditional first reads. Both paths preserve Korean
user-facing messages, explicit target/default develop, existing user changes, and the stop conditions below.
Instructions
- Bind the explicit target branch, otherwise
develop; require a clean, non-diverged base before creating a child branch. - For existing work, stop on protected branches, unsafe staged files, missing authority, dirty base preparation, or unresolvable transport.
- Stage explicit in-scope paths, create coherent Korean commits, check divergence before each push, and create or reuse exactly one MR targeting the bound base.
- Preserve the contract's transport order, secret guard, stop conditions, MR fields, and post-creation verification. Never force-push, rebase, merge, or auto-stash.
Examples
- New task: fast-forward
develop, create a task-derived child branch, then return to implementation without landing an empty commit. - Existing work: inspect the diff, stage only the coherent change set, push after the divergence check, and create or reuse the MR.
Limitations
Code review, CI polling, MR merge, branch deletion, force-push recovery, and rebase are outside this skill. The detailed command recipes and MR template remain in the operating contract to keep normal skill loading small.
Troubleshooting
| Condition | Resolution |
| Dirty or diverged base | Preserve it and stop; do not stash, reset, or merge around it. |
| No authenticated GitLab transport | Give the contract's recovery guidance and stop unless an approved fallback is available. |
| Existing MR | Reuse it and verify its canonical IID and URL. |
Verify
Report the branch, transport, MR IID/URL, staged scope, verification evidence, and any remaining risk.
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- techbuzzz/awesome-opencode★ 2same name
- bacsystem/skills★ 1same name
- kennguyen887/agent-foundation★ 1same name
- abhattacherjee/git-flow★ 0same name
- evenweiss/ai-skills★ 0same name
- halkn/skills★ 0same name
- ngxccc/engineered-skills★ 0same name
- vindreshsingh/engineering-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository65 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-evalSkill
- architecture-review-workflowSkill
- backend-code-review-workflowSkill
- code-authoring-routerSkill
- code-diagram-extractSkill
- codex-agent-runtimeSkill
- design-pattern-applySkill
- diagram-stylerSkill
- document-designerSkill
- e2e-evidence-reportSkill
- e2e-report-rendererSkill
- e2e-runnerSkill
- e2e-scenario-authorSkill
- e2e-test-workflowSkill
- entitySkill
- enumSkill
- explore-dead-codeSkill
- flywaySkill
- harness-proposeSkill
- harness-refineSkill
- java-spring-review-workflowSkill
- knowledge-auditSkill
- korean-dev-writerSkill
- kotlin-code-authoringSkill
- kotlin-spring-reviewSkill
- kotlin-spring-review-workflowSkill
- learnSkill
- mapperSkill
- markdown-publisherSkill
- mermaid-diagramsSkill
- mssql-code-authoringSkill
- nl-sql-querySkill
- notion-domain-contextSkill
- oop-design-reviewSkill
- opensearch-code-authoringSkill
- opensearch-optimizationSkill
- opensearch-query-reviewSkill
- opensearch-review-workflowSkill
- opensearch-schema-reviewSkill
- pdf-qaSkill
- playwright-e2eSkill
- postgres-code-authoringSkill
- postgres-query-reviewSkill
- postgres-review-workflowSkill
- postgres-risk-checkSkill
- postgres-schema-designSkill
- product-requirementsSkill
- product-ui-designSkill
- refactoring-catalogSkill
- repositorySkill
- requestSkill
- responseSkill
- retroSkill
- schema-doc-extractSkill
- security-scan-workflowSkill
- serviceSkill
- skill-updaterSkill
- start-taskSkill
- test-authoringSkill
- test-quality-refactoring-workflowSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

