writing-product-specs
Skill11 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when asked to write a product spec, PRD, or requirements document, or to design a new feature or project before implementation - interactively elicits problem, audience, success criteria, and scope, then produces a structured spec file
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- architecture-diagrammingSkill
- at-risk-detectionSkill
- build-faq-from-issuesSkill
- context-aware-questionsSkill
- daily-planning-ritualSkill
- dependency-mappingSkill
- estimating-change-footprintSkill
- estimating-work-itemsSkill
- idea-to-designSkill
- issue-decompositionSkill
- markdown-formattingSkill
- mermaid-diagramsSkill
- prepare-meeting-agendaSkill
- project-analysisSkill
- project-planningSkill
- repairing-project-setupSkill
- requirement-elicitationSkill
- research-topic-summarizeSkill
- setting-up-a-projectSkill
- sgai-goalSkill
- stakeholder-trackingSkill
- stakeholder-updatesSkill
- summarize-conversation-threadSkill
- supervising-conductor-workspacesSkill
- supervising-paradev-workspacesSkill
- timeline-planningSkill
- triage-new-issuesSkill
- working-on-an-epicSkill
- working-on-an-issueSkill
- writing-user-storiesSkill
- writing-verification-plansSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 28
Do NOT use this skill for implementation plans — specs describe what to build and why, not the step-by-step engineering work.
- Distinctive: line 32
Follow this process to elicit the necessary information and compose a comprehensive product specification.
- Distinctive: line 36
Ask questions to understand the feature or project.
- Distinctive: line 55
After presenting the draft:
- Distinctive: line 56
Ask the user for edits, clarifications, or additions
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Writing Product Specifications
Overview
Write comprehensive product specification documents that clearly communicate what we're building, why we're building it, and how we'll know it's successful. Document everything stakeholders need to understand: the problem context, target audience, requirements, success criteria, and tradeoffs. Give them a complete picture of the feature or project.
Assume the reader is a skilled product person or engineer, but knows nothing about this specific feature or the problem domain. Assume they need clear context to understand the "why" behind the work.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-product-specs skill to create the product specification."
Core principle: Product specifications are detailed descriptions of the features and functionality of a product. They are used to communicate the requirements of the product to the development team.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- You are explicitly asked to write a product specification, product spec, or PRD (Product Requirements Document)
- You are asked to design a new feature and need to document requirements before implementation
- You are planning a project and need to define what will be built and why
- You need to communicate product requirements to stakeholders, engineers, or designers
- A feature request needs to be expanded into a detailed specification with context, requirements, and success criteria
- You are asked to document the "what" and "why" of a product decision before moving to implementation
Do NOT use this skill for implementation plans — specs describe what to build and why, not the step-by-step engineering work.
Process for Writing a Product Spec
Follow this process to elicit the necessary information and compose a comprehensive product specification.
Step 1: Understand the Requested Feature or Project
Ask questions to understand the feature or project. Gather information about:
- What is it? What feature or project are we building? What does it do?
- Who is the audience? Who are we solving this problem for? What are their roles, personas, or characteristics?
- What are their problems? What specific pain points or challenges does the audience face? What is broken or missing?
- How will this feature/project solve them? What is the proposed solution? How does it address the problems?
- How will they benefit? What specifically is the benefit? What value does this deliver? What outcomes or improvements will users experience?
- How will we know if we've succeeded? What are the success metrics, validation criteria, or observable outcomes?
- How will we know if we've failed? What would indicate failure? What are the failure modes or negative indicators?
- What are we NOT doing? What is explicitly out of scope? What related features or capabilities are we excluding?
Continue asking questions until you have enough information to draft a complete spec. Don't proceed to drafting until you have clear answers to these core questions.
Step 2: Draft the Specification
Using the information gathered, draft the product specification. Follow the section structure in spec-template.md. Present the complete draft to the user.
Step 3: Iterate Based on Feedback
After presenting the draft:
- Ask the user for edits, clarifications, or additions
- Identify gaps in the spec and ask targeted questions to fill them
- Revise the spec based on feedback
- Continue iterating until the user confirms the spec is complete and accurate
Step 4: Finalize and Save
Once the user confirms the spec is good enough:
- Review the final spec against the section structure in spec-template.md
- Save the spec as a markdown file named
spec-<feature-name>-MM-DD-YYYY.md(or as requested by the user)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

