agentleFS
brittbritt/agent-skills/skills/stakeholder-tracking/SKILL.md

stakeholder-tracking

Skill11 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when identifying project stakeholders, asked 'who are the stakeholders', checking whether a plan covers all stakeholder goals, or linking GitHub issues to stakeholder needs - maintains persona profiles (goals, pain points, priorities) and generates goal-to-issue coverage reports with gaps

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When an issue addresses a stakeholder goal:

    line 49
  2. Very specific:

    Read the stakeholder's file in docs/stakeholders/

    line 51
  3. Very specific:

    Add the issue number to the linkedIssues section under the matching goal

    line 52
  4. Distinctive:

    When asked about stakeholder coverage:

    line 57
  5. Very specific:

    Read all profiles in docs/stakeholders/

    line 59
  6. Distinctive:

    When stakeholder priorities might conflict:

    line 83
  7. Distinctive:

    Document as a known tradeoff

    line 90
  8. Distinctive:

    Link issues early: When creating issues, immediately link them to relevant goals

    line 111
  9. Distinctive:

    Review coverage regularly: Check coverage when planning sprints or releases

    line 112
  10. Distinctive:

    Document conflicts: When priorities conflict, record the decision and rationale

    line 113

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Stakeholder Tracking

Purpose

Help users define stakeholder personas and track their goals, ensuring all perspectives are addressed throughout the project lifecycle.

When to Use This Skill

  • Starting a new project and need to identify stakeholders
  • Plus any of the triggers in the Natural Language Triggers table below

Storage Format

Each stakeholder is a markdown file at docs/stakeholders/<name>.md containing a YAML block. List stakeholders with Glob over docs/stakeholders/*.md; search profile contents (a goal, role, or issue number) with Grep over that directory.

type: stakeholder
name: End User
role: Product manager
description: Plans features and writes specs for the engineering team
goals:
  - Quickly create well-formed issues
  - AI assistance for gap analysis
painPoints:
  - Writing specs is time-consuming
  - Context switching between tools
priorities:
  - Context
  - Quality
  - Integration
linkedIssues:
  - goal: "Quickly create well-formed issues"
    issues: [42, 56]

Workflow

Managing Profiles

To add a stakeholder, ask conversationally for their name, role, description, goals (what they want to achieve), pain points (current frustrations), and priorities (in order); confirm the profile, then write it to docs/stakeholders/<name>.md in the YAML format above. To list, Glob the directory and present a summary table of name, role, and top goals. To view, update, or remove a stakeholder, Read their file and present it, apply the requested edits, or delete it (confirm before deleting).

Linking Issues to Goals

When an issue addresses a stakeholder goal:

  1. Read the stakeholder's file in docs/stakeholders/
  2. Add the issue number to the linkedIssues section under the matching goal
  3. Save the updated file

Checking Coverage

When asked about stakeholder coverage:

  1. Read all profiles in docs/stakeholders/
  2. Fetch open issues with gh issue list --state open --json number,title (requires the gh CLI)
  3. For each stakeholder, check which goals have linked issues and which don't
  4. Calculate coverage percentages
  5. Present a coverage report highlighting gaps

Coverage report format:

## Stakeholder Coverage Report

### End User (2/3 goals covered - 67%)
- [x] Quickly create well-formed issues (linked: #42, #56)
- [x] AI assistance for gap analysis (linked: #78)
- [ ] **GAP**: Fast context switching - no issues address this

### Product Owner (1/2 goals covered - 50%)
- [x] Track project progress (linked: #12)
- [ ] **GAP**: Stakeholder visibility - no issues address this

### Overall Coverage: 60% (3/5 goals linked to issues)

Resolving Conflicts

When stakeholder priorities might conflict:

  1. Identify the conflicting priorities by comparing stakeholder files
  2. Present the conflict clearly to the user
  3. Offer resolution options:
    • Prioritize one stakeholder's needs
    • Find a compromise
    • Document as a known tradeoff
  4. Record the resolution by updating the relevant stakeholder files

Natural Language Triggers

Respond to these types of questions:

Question TypeAction
"Who are the stakeholders?"List all profiles in docs/stakeholders/
"Add a stakeholder"Start conversational profile creation
"What are [Name]'s goals?"Read and show specific stakeholder's goals
"Does this address stakeholder concerns?"Generate coverage report
"Show me stakeholder coverage"Generate coverage report
"Link issue #X to [goal]"Update stakeholder file with issue link
"Are there any conflicts?"Compare stakeholder priorities for conflicts

Best Practices

  1. Start with key stakeholders: Focus on 3-5 primary stakeholders initially
  2. Be specific with goals: "Complete checkout in under 2 minutes" is better than "Fast checkout"
  3. Link issues early: When creating issues, immediately link them to relevant goals
  4. Review coverage regularly: Check coverage when planning sprints or releases
  5. Document conflicts: When priorities conflict, record the decision and rationale

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.