agentleFS
brittbritt/agent-skills/skills/architecture-diagramming/SKILL.md

architecture-diagramming

Skill11 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user asks for an architecture diagram, says 'show me the system architecture' or 'diagram the components', or during project planning - generates GitHub-compatible Mermaid flowcharts showing components, layers, subgraph boundaries, and data flows

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When explaining how components interact

    line 16
  2. Very specific:

    When NOT to use: not for issue/task dependencies (use dependency-mapping) or API call sequences and process flows (use mermaid-diagrams …

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    Use subgraphs to show:

    line 157
  4. Distinctive:

    Create a clean Mermaid diagram that:

    line 164
  5. Distinctive:

    Use clear, abbreviated names:

    line 172
  6. Distinctive:

    Label relationships: - When meaning isn't obvious

    line 209
  7. Distinctive:

    Ask if user wants more detail in any area

    line 217

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Architecture Diagramming Skill

Generate clear, GitHub-compatible Mermaid architecture diagrams that visualize system components, layers, boundaries, and data flows.

When to Use

Activate this skill when:

  • User asks for an architecture diagram
  • User says "show me the system architecture", "diagram the components"
  • During project planning to visualize the system design
  • When explaining how components interact

When NOT to use: not for issue/task dependencies (use dependency-mapping) or API call sequences and process flows (use mermaid-diagrams sequence diagrams).

CRITICAL: Mermaid Syntax Rules

NEVER use parentheses inside labels

Parentheses in Mermaid labels cause rendering errors on GitHub.

WRONG - Will break:

flowchart TD
    A[Component (main)]
    B[Service (auth)]

CORRECT - Use dashes or commas:

flowchart TD
    A[Component - main]
    B[Service - auth]

ALWAYS ensure matching brackets

Each node shape uses specific brackets that must match:

  • [Rectangle] - Standard component
  • {Diamond} - Decision point
  • ([Stadium]) - Pill shape
  • [(Database)] - Cylinder for data stores
  • ((Circle)) - Circle node

WRONG:

flowchart TD
    A{Decision]

CORRECT:

flowchart TD
    A{Decision}

For other syntax rules, see the mermaid-diagrams skill.

Diagram Patterns

System Overview

Show major components and their relationships:

flowchart TB
    subgraph Client Layer
        Web[Web App]
        Mobile[Mobile App]
    end

    subgraph API Layer
        Gateway[API Gateway]
        Auth[Auth Service]
    end

    subgraph Data Layer
        DB[(Database)]
        Cache[(Redis Cache)]
    end

    Web --> Gateway
    Mobile --> Gateway
    Gateway --> Auth
    Gateway --> DB
    Auth --> Cache

Layered Architecture

Show horizontal layers with clear boundaries:

flowchart TB
    subgraph Presentation
        UI[User Interface]
        API[REST API]
    end

    subgraph Business
        Services[Business Services]
        Rules[Business Rules]
    end

    subgraph Data
        Repos[Repositories]
        Entities[Domain Entities]
    end

    UI --> Services
    API --> Services
    Services --> Rules
    Services --> Repos
    Repos --> Entities

Request Flow

Show how a request flows through the system:

flowchart LR
    Client[Client] --> LB[Load Balancer]
    LB --> API1[API Server 1]
    LB --> API2[API Server 2]
    API1 --> Queue[(Message Queue)]
    API2 --> Queue
    Queue --> Worker[Background Worker]
    Worker --> DB[(Database)]

Architecture Analysis Process

Step 1: Identify Components

  • What are the major modules or services?
  • What external systems are involved?
  • What data stores are used?

Step 2: Determine Layers

Common layers to consider:

  • Presentation: UI, API endpoints
  • Business: Core logic, workflows
  • Data: Repositories, entities
  • Infrastructure: External services, queues

Step 3: Map Relationships

  • Request/response flows
  • Data dependencies
  • Event/message flows
  • Shared resources

Step 4: Apply Boundaries

Use subgraphs to show:

  • Team ownership
  • Deployment units
  • Security boundaries
  • Scalability zones

Step 5: Generate Diagram

Create a clean Mermaid diagram that:

  • Fits on one screen when possible
  • Uses consistent naming
  • Shows data flow direction
  • Groups related components

Node Naming Conventions

Use clear, abbreviated names:

  • API not ApplicationProgrammingInterface
  • Auth not AuthenticationService
  • DB or use [(Name)] for databases
  • Queue or MQ for message queues

Arrow Semantics

ArrowMeaning
-->Standard request/response
-.->Async or optional
==>Critical path
--text-->Labeled relationship

Subgraph Styling

flowchart TB
    subgraph External[External Systems]
        PaymentAPI[Payment Gateway]
        EmailAPI[Email Service]
    end

    subgraph Internal[Internal Services]
        App[Application]
    end

    App --> PaymentAPI
    App --> EmailAPI

Best Practices

  1. Keep it simple - 5-15 components max per diagram
  2. Use subgraphs - Group related components
  3. Show data flow - Arrows indicate direction
  4. Label relationships - When meaning isn't obvious
  5. Avoid clutter - Break complex systems into multiple diagrams
  6. Be consistent - Same naming conventions throughout

After Generating Diagram

  • Offer to save the diagram to an appropriate location in the project
  • Suggest adding to a planning or design document
  • Ask if user wants more detail in any area
  • Recommend dependency-mapping for issue visualization

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.