requirement-elicitation
Skill11 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when gathering project requirements, or when a user says 'help me define requirements' or 'figure out what to build' - adaptive wizard covering functional, nonfunctional, constraints, and edge cases with domain-specific questions for web apps, APIs, CLIs, mobile, and data pipelines
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nemori-ai/cc-mastertheir own version, first seen Jul 17, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- nemori-ai/cc-master★ 12same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- architecture-diagrammingSkill
- at-risk-detectionSkill
- build-faq-from-issuesSkill
- context-aware-questionsSkill
- daily-planning-ritualSkill
- dependency-mappingSkill
- estimating-change-footprintSkill
- estimating-work-itemsSkill
- idea-to-designSkill
- issue-decompositionSkill
- markdown-formattingSkill
- mermaid-diagramsSkill
- prepare-meeting-agendaSkill
- project-analysisSkill
- project-planningSkill
- repairing-project-setupSkill
- research-topic-summarizeSkill
- setting-up-a-projectSkill
- sgai-goalSkill
- stakeholder-trackingSkill
- stakeholder-updatesSkill
- summarize-conversation-threadSkill
- supervising-conductor-workspacesSkill
- supervising-paradev-workspacesSkill
- timeline-planningSkill
- triage-new-issuesSkill
- working-on-an-epicSkill
- working-on-an-issueSkill
- writing-product-specsSkill
- writing-user-storiesSkill
- writing-verification-plansSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Domain Selection: Ask what type of project they're building
- Distinctive: line 23
When the user wants to define requirements:
- Distinctive: line 24
Ask the user what type of project they're building
- Distinctive: line 26
Ask the first question
- Distinctive: line 41
Ask clearly and conversationally (not robotically)
- Distinctive: line 44
After the user answers, mentally note the response and continue
- Distinctive: line 48
When a section is complete:
- Distinctive: line 50
Ask if they want to add anything else to this section
- Distinctive: line 65
DO:: Ask one question at a time.
- Distinctive: line 71
When asking the user what type of project they're building, present these options:
- Distinctive: line 123
When generating the final document, use this structure:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Requirement Elicitation Wizard
You are guiding the user through a comprehensive requirement elicitation process. Your goal is to capture all functional, nonfunctional, and edge-case requirements before they start building.
How This Works
- Start: User says something like "Let's define requirements" or "Help me figure out what to build"
- Domain Selection: Ask what type of project they're building
- Guided Questions: Walk through each section, asking questions one at a time
- Adaptive Flow: Branch based on answers (e.g., if they mention integrations, ask which ones)
- Refinement: Allow revisiting any section
- Output: Generate a comprehensive requirements document saved as
requirements-<project>.mdin the working directory
Conversation Flow
Starting the Session
When the user wants to define requirements:
- Ask the user what type of project they're building
- Explain what you'll cover: Overview, Functional, Nonfunctional, Constraints, Edge Cases
- Ask the first question
Sections to Cover
Walk through these five sections in order:
- Project Overview - Name, purpose, target users, success criteria
- Functional Requirements - Features, endpoints, integrations, user workflows
- Nonfunctional Requirements - Performance, security, reliability, scalability
- Constraints - Timeline, budget, technical requirements, team size
- Edge Cases & Risks - Error handling, failure modes, boundary conditions
Asking Questions
For each question:
- Ask clearly and conversationally (not robotically)
- Include context explaining why you're asking
- Indicate if it's required or optional
- After the user answers, mentally note the response and continue
Section Transitions
When a section is complete:
- Summarize what was captured: "Great, for the overview I captured: [summary]"
- Ask if they want to add anything else to this section
- Append the completed section to
requirements-<project>.mdin the working directory - Introduce the next section briefly
User Commands
Handle these natural language requests:
- "Skip this section" - Move to next section, note it was skipped
- "Let's revisit [section]" - Re-read
requirements-<project>.mdto find the saved section, then update it - "What have we captured?" - Summarize all captured requirements from
requirements-<project>.md - "Generate the document" - Compile all captured sections into the final requirements document
- "Save this" - Write current state to
requirements-<project>.md
Question Style
DO: Ask one question at a time; be conversational ("Tell me about..."); provide context ("This helps us understand scale requirements"); accept natural language answers.
DON'T: Dump all questions at once; be robotic or form-like; require yes/no when open answers are better; skip ahead without confirmation.
Domain Options
When asking the user what type of project they're building, present these options:
| Domain | Description |
| web-app | Frontend web applications |
| api | REST or GraphQL backend services |
| full-stack | Combined frontend and backend applications |
| cli | Command-line tools and terminal applications |
| mobile | iOS, Android, or cross-platform mobile apps |
| data-pipeline | ETL processes, data transformations, analytics pipelines |
| library | Reusable packages, SDKs, or libraries |
| infrastructure | DevOps, cloud infrastructure, platform tools |
| ai-ml | AI/ML applications, model training, inference services |
| general | Projects that don't fit the above categories |
Domain-Specific Questions
Web App / Full-Stack
- What framework/tech stack?
- What pages/views are needed?
- Authentication requirements?
- Third-party integrations?
API
- REST or GraphQL?
- What endpoints are needed?
- Authentication method (JWT, OAuth, API key)?
- Rate limiting requirements?
- Versioning strategy?
CLI
- What commands are needed?
- Interactive or batch mode?
- Configuration file format?
- Output formats (JSON, table, plain text)?
Mobile
- iOS, Android, or cross-platform?
- Offline support needed?
- Push notifications?
- Device features (camera, GPS, etc.)?
Data Pipeline
- Data sources and destinations?
- Batch or streaming?
- Volume and frequency?
- Error handling and retry strategy?
For library, infrastructure, ai-ml, full-stack (beyond the web-app questions above), and general projects, there is no dedicated question set — walk through the generic five sections, adapting questions to the domain.
Requirements Document Format
When generating the final document, use this structure:
# Requirements: [Project Name]
## 1. Project Overview
- **Name**: [name]
- **Purpose**: [description]
- **Target Users**: [who]
- **Success Criteria**: [how to measure success]
## 2. Functional Requirements
### [Feature Group 1]
- FR-1: [requirement]
- FR-2: [requirement]
## 3. Nonfunctional Requirements
- NFR-1: [performance/security/reliability requirement]
## 4. Constraints
- CON-1: [constraint]
## 5. Edge Cases & Risks
- RISK-1: [risk and mitigation]
## 6. Open Questions
- [any unresolved items]Persistence
Append each completed section to requirements-<project>.md in the working directory so nothing is lost if the session ends. To revisit or summarize earlier work, re-read that file. When finished, compile all sections into the final document in the same file and confirm with the user:
"I've compiled your requirements document into
requirements-<project>.md. Want to review or adjust anything?"
After Completing Requirements
Suggest natural next steps:
issue-decompositionskill (if available) to break requirements into actionable work itemsarchitecture-diagrammingskill (if available) to visualize the system
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

